Cargando…

BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A large, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of repeat BCG found 49% efficacy against leprosy but no protection against tuberculosis after 6–9 years’ follow-up in 1995. We report here additional follow-up, which resulted in greatly increased tuberculosis case numbers, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glynn, Judith R, Fielding, Katherine, Mzembe, Themba, Sichali, Lifted, Banda, Louis, McLean, Estelle, Kanjala, Chifundo, Crampin, Amelia C, Ponnighaus, Jorg M, Warndorff, David K, Fine, Paul E M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34534489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00309-0
_version_ 1784571509303410688
author Glynn, Judith R
Fielding, Katherine
Mzembe, Themba
Sichali, Lifted
Banda, Louis
McLean, Estelle
Kanjala, Chifundo
Crampin, Amelia C
Ponnighaus, Jorg M
Warndorff, David K
Fine, Paul E M
author_facet Glynn, Judith R
Fielding, Katherine
Mzembe, Themba
Sichali, Lifted
Banda, Louis
McLean, Estelle
Kanjala, Chifundo
Crampin, Amelia C
Ponnighaus, Jorg M
Warndorff, David K
Fine, Paul E M
author_sort Glynn, Judith R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of repeat BCG found 49% efficacy against leprosy but no protection against tuberculosis after 6–9 years’ follow-up in 1995. We report here additional follow-up, which resulted in greatly increased tuberculosis case numbers, and allowed subgroup analysis. METHODS: Nearly 47 000 individuals of all ages living in northern Malawi with a BCG vaccine scar were randomly assigned (1:1) between 1986 and 1989 to receive a second BCG or placebo. The investigators and project staff remained masked to all interventions. Enhanced passive surveillance ensured ascertainment of tuberculosis and leprosy to the end of 2018. Tuberculosis case definitions included rigorous microbiological or histological confirmation. Prespecified subgroup analyses were by tuberculosis type, age at vaccination, time since vaccination, previous tuberculin reactivity, HIV status and Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage. The original trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN11311670. FINDINGS: In follow-up until Dec 31, 2018, 824 participants had developed tuberculosis, including 786 with pulmonary disease, of whom 383 (63%) of 607 with known HIV status were HIV positive. There was no effect of a second BCG overall (odds ratio [OR] 0·92; 95% CI 0·80–1·05), or for pulmonary (0·93; 0·81–1·07), or lymph node tuberculosis (0·60; 0·31–1·17). The OR was lower for those with known HIV-negative tuberculosis (0·77; 0·59–1·00), for those vaccinated as children (aged <5 years, 0·74; 0·41–1·35; aged 5–14 years, 0·77; 0·60–0·99), and for cases arising at least 20 years after vaccination (0·79; 0·63–1·01). There were no differences by tuberculin status at vaccination, or lineage. There was no evidence of protection against leprosy beyond 10 years after vaccination (although there have been only nine diagnostically certain cases since 1995). INTERPRETATION: There was no evidence that repeat BCG vaccination provides appreciable protection against overall tuberculosis in this rural African population with a high prevalence of HIV. Subgroup effects should not be overinterpreted given the multiple analyses done. However, the evidence for modest protection against HIV-negative tuberculosis, and for a delayed benefit in those vaccinated as children, is consistent with other observations in the literature. FUNDING: LEPRA, Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8459381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84593812021-09-28 BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Glynn, Judith R Fielding, Katherine Mzembe, Themba Sichali, Lifted Banda, Louis McLean, Estelle Kanjala, Chifundo Crampin, Amelia C Ponnighaus, Jorg M Warndorff, David K Fine, Paul E M Lancet Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: A large, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of repeat BCG found 49% efficacy against leprosy but no protection against tuberculosis after 6–9 years’ follow-up in 1995. We report here additional follow-up, which resulted in greatly increased tuberculosis case numbers, and allowed subgroup analysis. METHODS: Nearly 47 000 individuals of all ages living in northern Malawi with a BCG vaccine scar were randomly assigned (1:1) between 1986 and 1989 to receive a second BCG or placebo. The investigators and project staff remained masked to all interventions. Enhanced passive surveillance ensured ascertainment of tuberculosis and leprosy to the end of 2018. Tuberculosis case definitions included rigorous microbiological or histological confirmation. Prespecified subgroup analyses were by tuberculosis type, age at vaccination, time since vaccination, previous tuberculin reactivity, HIV status and Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage. The original trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN11311670. FINDINGS: In follow-up until Dec 31, 2018, 824 participants had developed tuberculosis, including 786 with pulmonary disease, of whom 383 (63%) of 607 with known HIV status were HIV positive. There was no effect of a second BCG overall (odds ratio [OR] 0·92; 95% CI 0·80–1·05), or for pulmonary (0·93; 0·81–1·07), or lymph node tuberculosis (0·60; 0·31–1·17). The OR was lower for those with known HIV-negative tuberculosis (0·77; 0·59–1·00), for those vaccinated as children (aged <5 years, 0·74; 0·41–1·35; aged 5–14 years, 0·77; 0·60–0·99), and for cases arising at least 20 years after vaccination (0·79; 0·63–1·01). There were no differences by tuberculin status at vaccination, or lineage. There was no evidence of protection against leprosy beyond 10 years after vaccination (although there have been only nine diagnostically certain cases since 1995). INTERPRETATION: There was no evidence that repeat BCG vaccination provides appreciable protection against overall tuberculosis in this rural African population with a high prevalence of HIV. Subgroup effects should not be overinterpreted given the multiple analyses done. However, the evidence for modest protection against HIV-negative tuberculosis, and for a delayed benefit in those vaccinated as children, is consistent with other observations in the literature. FUNDING: LEPRA, Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Elsevier Ltd 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8459381/ /pubmed/34534489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00309-0 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Glynn, Judith R
Fielding, Katherine
Mzembe, Themba
Sichali, Lifted
Banda, Louis
McLean, Estelle
Kanjala, Chifundo
Crampin, Amelia C
Ponnighaus, Jorg M
Warndorff, David K
Fine, Paul E M
BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
title BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
title_full BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
title_fullStr BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
title_short BCG re-vaccination in Malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
title_sort bcg re-vaccination in malawi: 30-year follow-up of a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34534489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00309-0
work_keys_str_mv AT glynnjudithr bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT fieldingkatherine bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT mzembethemba bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT sichalilifted bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT bandalouis bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT mcleanestelle bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT kanjalachifundo bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT crampinameliac bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT ponnighausjorgm bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT warndorffdavidk bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT finepaulem bcgrevaccinationinmalawi30yearfollowupofalargerandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial