Cargando…
Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
Introduction Tibial fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures, particularly in automobile accidents. Percutaneous reduction with conventional reduction forceps and un reamed intramedullary nailing, transpatellar, and medial parapatellar tendon approaches are all used, but tibial intra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589315 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17404 |
_version_ | 1784571509858107392 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Mohammad Noah Hafeez, Auzair Faraz, Ahmad Naveed, Elishbah Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas Rasool, Muhammad Umer Jamshed, Muhammad Shafiq, Hassan |
author_facet | Khan, Mohammad Noah Hafeez, Auzair Faraz, Ahmad Naveed, Elishbah Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas Rasool, Muhammad Umer Jamshed, Muhammad Shafiq, Hassan |
author_sort | Khan, Mohammad Noah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Tibial fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures, particularly in automobile accidents. Percutaneous reduction with conventional reduction forceps and un reamed intramedullary nailing, transpatellar, and medial parapatellar tendon approaches are all used, but tibial intramedullary nails are still primarily inserted through a transpatellar tendon splitting or medial parapatellar tendon approach. Objective The aim and objectives of this study are to assess the mean pain score after nailing for a tibial fracture using a medial parapatellar versus a transpatellar tendon method retrospectively in order to enhance operational planning. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study that took place in a UK level 1 trauma center. Data from 60 patients were included between February 2019 and February 2020. An equal number of patients were selected for both approaches to maintain accuracy. The advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol was used to handle all of the patients in both groups in order to rule out any other injuries or fractures, after which they were scheduled for surgery after stabilization. They were subsequently evaluated during a three-month follow-up in an outdoor clinic, where they were given a pain score using the visual analogue score (VAS) while moving their knee joints. The mean pain score was differentiated by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), injury side, and injury type. Results Patients were divided into groups based on their ages. Patients in the transpatellar tendon group were 32.83±5.13 years old, whereas those in the medial parapatellar tendon group were 31.4 ±5.42 years old. The gender distribution of the patients revealed that the majority of the patients in both groups were male. In both groups, the left side was the most usually affected. The difference between the two groups' mean pain scores at three months was substantially lower in the medial parapatellar approach (p=0.005). Conclusion For patients having intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures, the medial parapatellar route is associated with a lower mean pain score than the transpatellar route. As a result, we may use this method in these individuals regularly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8459389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84593892021-09-28 Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis Khan, Mohammad Noah Hafeez, Auzair Faraz, Ahmad Naveed, Elishbah Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas Rasool, Muhammad Umer Jamshed, Muhammad Shafiq, Hassan Cureus Trauma Introduction Tibial fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures, particularly in automobile accidents. Percutaneous reduction with conventional reduction forceps and un reamed intramedullary nailing, transpatellar, and medial parapatellar tendon approaches are all used, but tibial intramedullary nails are still primarily inserted through a transpatellar tendon splitting or medial parapatellar tendon approach. Objective The aim and objectives of this study are to assess the mean pain score after nailing for a tibial fracture using a medial parapatellar versus a transpatellar tendon method retrospectively in order to enhance operational planning. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study that took place in a UK level 1 trauma center. Data from 60 patients were included between February 2019 and February 2020. An equal number of patients were selected for both approaches to maintain accuracy. The advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol was used to handle all of the patients in both groups in order to rule out any other injuries or fractures, after which they were scheduled for surgery after stabilization. They were subsequently evaluated during a three-month follow-up in an outdoor clinic, where they were given a pain score using the visual analogue score (VAS) while moving their knee joints. The mean pain score was differentiated by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), injury side, and injury type. Results Patients were divided into groups based on their ages. Patients in the transpatellar tendon group were 32.83±5.13 years old, whereas those in the medial parapatellar tendon group were 31.4 ±5.42 years old. The gender distribution of the patients revealed that the majority of the patients in both groups were male. In both groups, the left side was the most usually affected. The difference between the two groups' mean pain scores at three months was substantially lower in the medial parapatellar approach (p=0.005). Conclusion For patients having intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures, the medial parapatellar route is associated with a lower mean pain score than the transpatellar route. As a result, we may use this method in these individuals regularly. Cureus 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8459389/ /pubmed/34589315 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17404 Text en Copyright © 2021, Khan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Trauma Khan, Mohammad Noah Hafeez, Auzair Faraz, Ahmad Naveed, Elishbah Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas Rasool, Muhammad Umer Jamshed, Muhammad Shafiq, Hassan Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis |
title | Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of medial parapatellar and transpatellar tendon approach in intramedullary interlocking nailing for tibial fracture: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589315 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanmohammadnoah comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis AT hafeezauzair comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis AT farazahmad comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis AT naveedelishbah comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis AT ilyasmuhammadwaqas comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis AT rasoolmuhammadumer comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis AT jamshedmuhammad comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis AT shafiqhassan comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis |