Cargando…

Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction Tibial fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures, particularly in automobile accidents. Percutaneous reduction with conventional reduction forceps and un reamed intramedullary nailing, transpatellar, and medial parapatellar tendon approaches are all used, but tibial intra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Mohammad Noah, Hafeez, Auzair, Faraz, Ahmad, Naveed, Elishbah, Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas, Rasool, Muhammad Umer, Jamshed, Muhammad, Shafiq, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589315
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17404
_version_ 1784571509858107392
author Khan, Mohammad Noah
Hafeez, Auzair
Faraz, Ahmad
Naveed, Elishbah
Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas
Rasool, Muhammad Umer
Jamshed, Muhammad
Shafiq, Hassan
author_facet Khan, Mohammad Noah
Hafeez, Auzair
Faraz, Ahmad
Naveed, Elishbah
Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas
Rasool, Muhammad Umer
Jamshed, Muhammad
Shafiq, Hassan
author_sort Khan, Mohammad Noah
collection PubMed
description Introduction Tibial fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures, particularly in automobile accidents. Percutaneous reduction with conventional reduction forceps and un reamed intramedullary nailing, transpatellar, and medial parapatellar tendon approaches are all used, but tibial intramedullary nails are still primarily inserted through a transpatellar tendon splitting or medial parapatellar tendon approach. Objective The aim and objectives of this study are to assess the mean pain score after nailing for a tibial fracture using a medial parapatellar versus a transpatellar tendon method retrospectively in order to enhance operational planning. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study that took place in a UK level 1 trauma center. Data from 60 patients were included between February 2019 and February 2020. An equal number of patients were selected for both approaches to maintain accuracy. The advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol was used to handle all of the patients in both groups in order to rule out any other injuries or fractures, after which they were scheduled for surgery after stabilization. They were subsequently evaluated during a three-month follow-up in an outdoor clinic, where they were given a pain score using the visual analogue score (VAS) while moving their knee joints. The mean pain score was differentiated by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), injury side, and injury type. Results Patients were divided into groups based on their ages. Patients in the transpatellar tendon group were 32.83±5.13 years old, whereas those in the medial parapatellar tendon group were 31.4 ±5.42 years old. The gender distribution of the patients revealed that the majority of the patients in both groups were male. In both groups, the left side was the most usually affected. The difference between the two groups' mean pain scores at three months was substantially lower in the medial parapatellar approach (p=0.005). Conclusion For patients having intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures, the medial parapatellar route is associated with a lower mean pain score than the transpatellar route. As a result, we may use this method in these individuals regularly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8459389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84593892021-09-28 Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis Khan, Mohammad Noah Hafeez, Auzair Faraz, Ahmad Naveed, Elishbah Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas Rasool, Muhammad Umer Jamshed, Muhammad Shafiq, Hassan Cureus Trauma Introduction Tibial fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures, particularly in automobile accidents. Percutaneous reduction with conventional reduction forceps and un reamed intramedullary nailing, transpatellar, and medial parapatellar tendon approaches are all used, but tibial intramedullary nails are still primarily inserted through a transpatellar tendon splitting or medial parapatellar tendon approach. Objective The aim and objectives of this study are to assess the mean pain score after nailing for a tibial fracture using a medial parapatellar versus a transpatellar tendon method retrospectively in order to enhance operational planning. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study that took place in a UK level 1 trauma center. Data from 60 patients were included between February 2019 and February 2020. An equal number of patients were selected for both approaches to maintain accuracy. The advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol was used to handle all of the patients in both groups in order to rule out any other injuries or fractures, after which they were scheduled for surgery after stabilization. They were subsequently evaluated during a three-month follow-up in an outdoor clinic, where they were given a pain score using the visual analogue score (VAS) while moving their knee joints. The mean pain score was differentiated by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), injury side, and injury type. Results Patients were divided into groups based on their ages. Patients in the transpatellar tendon group were 32.83±5.13 years old, whereas those in the medial parapatellar tendon group were 31.4 ±5.42 years old. The gender distribution of the patients revealed that the majority of the patients in both groups were male. In both groups, the left side was the most usually affected. The difference between the two groups' mean pain scores at three months was substantially lower in the medial parapatellar approach (p=0.005). Conclusion For patients having intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures, the medial parapatellar route is associated with a lower mean pain score than the transpatellar route. As a result, we may use this method in these individuals regularly. Cureus 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8459389/ /pubmed/34589315 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17404 Text en Copyright © 2021, Khan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Trauma
Khan, Mohammad Noah
Hafeez, Auzair
Faraz, Ahmad
Naveed, Elishbah
Ilyas, Muhammad Waqas
Rasool, Muhammad Umer
Jamshed, Muhammad
Shafiq, Hassan
Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
title Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
title_short Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis
title_sort comparison of medial parapatellar and transpatellar tendon approach in intramedullary interlocking nailing for tibial fracture: a retrospective analysis
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589315
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17404
work_keys_str_mv AT khanmohammadnoah comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis
AT hafeezauzair comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis
AT farazahmad comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis
AT naveedelishbah comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis
AT ilyasmuhammadwaqas comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis
AT rasoolmuhammadumer comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis
AT jamshedmuhammad comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis
AT shafiqhassan comparisonofmedialparapatellarandtranspatellartendonapproachinintramedullaryinterlockingnailingfortibialfracturearetrospectiveanalysis