Cargando…

Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration

Synthetic bone void fillers based on calcium ceramics are used to fill cavities in the bone and promote bone regeneration. More recently, silk fibroin (SF), a protein polymer obtained from Bombyx mori silkworm, has emerged as a promising material in bone void filling. In this work, we have compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshpande, Rucha, Shukla, Swati, Sayyad, Raeesa, Salunke, Shalmali, Nisal, Anuya, Venugopalan, Premnath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10221
_version_ 1784571560685731840
author Deshpande, Rucha
Shukla, Swati
Sayyad, Raeesa
Salunke, Shalmali
Nisal, Anuya
Venugopalan, Premnath
author_facet Deshpande, Rucha
Shukla, Swati
Sayyad, Raeesa
Salunke, Shalmali
Nisal, Anuya
Venugopalan, Premnath
author_sort Deshpande, Rucha
collection PubMed
description Synthetic bone void fillers based on calcium ceramics are used to fill cavities in the bone and promote bone regeneration. More recently, silk fibroin (SF), a protein polymer obtained from Bombyx mori silkworm, has emerged as a promising material in bone void filling. In this work, we have compared the safety and efficacy of two types of silk fibroin‐based bone void fillers with currently used and commercially available ceramic bone void fillers (based on calcium sulphate, beta tricalcium phosphate, and beta tricalcium phosphate with hydroxyapatite). Further, we have also evaluated these two types of SF scaffolds, which have strikingly different structural attributes. The biocompatibility of these scaffolds was comparable as assessed by cytotoxicity assay, cellular adhesion assay, and immunogenic assay. Ability of the scaffolds to support differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) into an osteoblastic lineage was also evaluated in an in vitro differentiation experiment using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. These results revealed that cells cultured on SF scaffolds exhibit higher expression of early to late markers such as Runx2, BMPs, collagen, osterix, osteopontin, and osteocalcin as compared with ceramic‐based scaffolds. This observation was further validated by studying the expression of alkaline phosphatase and calcium deposition. We also show that scaffolds made from same material of SF, but characterized by very different pore architectures, have diverse outcome in stem cell differentiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8459602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84596022021-09-28 Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration Deshpande, Rucha Shukla, Swati Sayyad, Raeesa Salunke, Shalmali Nisal, Anuya Venugopalan, Premnath Bioeng Transl Med Research Articles Synthetic bone void fillers based on calcium ceramics are used to fill cavities in the bone and promote bone regeneration. More recently, silk fibroin (SF), a protein polymer obtained from Bombyx mori silkworm, has emerged as a promising material in bone void filling. In this work, we have compared the safety and efficacy of two types of silk fibroin‐based bone void fillers with currently used and commercially available ceramic bone void fillers (based on calcium sulphate, beta tricalcium phosphate, and beta tricalcium phosphate with hydroxyapatite). Further, we have also evaluated these two types of SF scaffolds, which have strikingly different structural attributes. The biocompatibility of these scaffolds was comparable as assessed by cytotoxicity assay, cellular adhesion assay, and immunogenic assay. Ability of the scaffolds to support differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) into an osteoblastic lineage was also evaluated in an in vitro differentiation experiment using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. These results revealed that cells cultured on SF scaffolds exhibit higher expression of early to late markers such as Runx2, BMPs, collagen, osterix, osteopontin, and osteocalcin as compared with ceramic‐based scaffolds. This observation was further validated by studying the expression of alkaline phosphatase and calcium deposition. We also show that scaffolds made from same material of SF, but characterized by very different pore architectures, have diverse outcome in stem cell differentiation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8459602/ /pubmed/34589598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10221 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Institute of Chemical Engineers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Deshpande, Rucha
Shukla, Swati
Sayyad, Raeesa
Salunke, Shalmali
Nisal, Anuya
Venugopalan, Premnath
Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration
title Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration
title_full Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration
title_fullStr Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration
title_short Silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: Comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration
title_sort silk fibroin and ceramic scaffolds: comparative in vitro studies for bone regeneration
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34589598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10221
work_keys_str_mv AT deshpanderucha silkfibroinandceramicscaffoldscomparativeinvitrostudiesforboneregeneration
AT shuklaswati silkfibroinandceramicscaffoldscomparativeinvitrostudiesforboneregeneration
AT sayyadraeesa silkfibroinandceramicscaffoldscomparativeinvitrostudiesforboneregeneration
AT salunkeshalmali silkfibroinandceramicscaffoldscomparativeinvitrostudiesforboneregeneration
AT nisalanuya silkfibroinandceramicscaffoldscomparativeinvitrostudiesforboneregeneration
AT venugopalanpremnath silkfibroinandceramicscaffoldscomparativeinvitrostudiesforboneregeneration