Cargando…

Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm

Dioecious plants are obligate outcrossers with separate male and female individuals, which can result in decreased seed set with increasing distance between the sexes. Wind pollination is a common correlate of dioecy, yet combined wind and insect pollination (ambophily) could be advantageous in comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aranda-Rickert, Adriana, Torréns, Javier, Yela, Natalia I., Brizuela, María Magdalena, Di Stilio, Verónica S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34567036
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.722405
_version_ 1784571610055835648
author Aranda-Rickert, Adriana
Torréns, Javier
Yela, Natalia I.
Brizuela, María Magdalena
Di Stilio, Verónica S.
author_facet Aranda-Rickert, Adriana
Torréns, Javier
Yela, Natalia I.
Brizuela, María Magdalena
Di Stilio, Verónica S.
author_sort Aranda-Rickert, Adriana
collection PubMed
description Dioecious plants are obligate outcrossers with separate male and female individuals, which can result in decreased seed set with increasing distance between the sexes. Wind pollination is a common correlate of dioecy, yet combined wind and insect pollination (ambophily) could be advantageous in compensating for decreased pollen flow to isolated females. Dioecious, ambophilous gymnosperms Ephedra (Gnetales) secrete pollination drops (PDs) in female cones that capture airborne pollen and attract ants that feed on them. Plant sugary secretions commonly reward ants in exchange for indirect plant defense against herbivores, and more rarely for pollination. We conducted field experiments to investigate whether ants are pollinators and/or plant defenders of South American Ephedra triandra, and whether their contribution to seed set and seed cone protection varies with distance between female and male plants. We quantified pollen flow in the wind and assessed the effectiveness of ants as pollinators by investigating their relative contribution to seed set, and their visitation rate in female plants at increasing distance from the nearest male. Ants accounted for most insect visits to female cones of E. triandra, where they consumed PDs, and pollen load was larger on bigger ants without reduction in pollen viability. While wind pollination was the main contributor to seed set overall, the relative contribution of ants was distance dependent. Ant contribution to seed set was not significant at shorter distances, yet at the farthest distance from the nearest male (23 m), where 20 times less pollen reached females, ants enhanced seed set by 30% compared to plants depending solely on wind pollination. We found no evidence that ants contribute to plant defense by preventing seed cone damage. Our results suggest that, despite their short-range movements, ants can offset pollen limitation in isolated females of wind-pollinated plants with separate sexes. We propose that ants enhance plant reproductive success via targeted delivery of airborne pollen, through frequent contact with ovule tips while consuming PDs. Our study constitutes the first experimental quantification of distance-dependent contribution of ants to pollination and provides a working hypothesis for ambophily in other dioecious plants lacking pollinator reward in male plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8459830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84598302021-09-24 Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm Aranda-Rickert, Adriana Torréns, Javier Yela, Natalia I. Brizuela, María Magdalena Di Stilio, Verónica S. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Dioecious plants are obligate outcrossers with separate male and female individuals, which can result in decreased seed set with increasing distance between the sexes. Wind pollination is a common correlate of dioecy, yet combined wind and insect pollination (ambophily) could be advantageous in compensating for decreased pollen flow to isolated females. Dioecious, ambophilous gymnosperms Ephedra (Gnetales) secrete pollination drops (PDs) in female cones that capture airborne pollen and attract ants that feed on them. Plant sugary secretions commonly reward ants in exchange for indirect plant defense against herbivores, and more rarely for pollination. We conducted field experiments to investigate whether ants are pollinators and/or plant defenders of South American Ephedra triandra, and whether their contribution to seed set and seed cone protection varies with distance between female and male plants. We quantified pollen flow in the wind and assessed the effectiveness of ants as pollinators by investigating their relative contribution to seed set, and their visitation rate in female plants at increasing distance from the nearest male. Ants accounted for most insect visits to female cones of E. triandra, where they consumed PDs, and pollen load was larger on bigger ants without reduction in pollen viability. While wind pollination was the main contributor to seed set overall, the relative contribution of ants was distance dependent. Ant contribution to seed set was not significant at shorter distances, yet at the farthest distance from the nearest male (23 m), where 20 times less pollen reached females, ants enhanced seed set by 30% compared to plants depending solely on wind pollination. We found no evidence that ants contribute to plant defense by preventing seed cone damage. Our results suggest that, despite their short-range movements, ants can offset pollen limitation in isolated females of wind-pollinated plants with separate sexes. We propose that ants enhance plant reproductive success via targeted delivery of airborne pollen, through frequent contact with ovule tips while consuming PDs. Our study constitutes the first experimental quantification of distance-dependent contribution of ants to pollination and provides a working hypothesis for ambophily in other dioecious plants lacking pollinator reward in male plants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8459830/ /pubmed/34567036 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.722405 Text en Copyright © 2021 Aranda-Rickert, Torréns, Yela, Brizuela and Di Stilio. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Aranda-Rickert, Adriana
Torréns, Javier
Yela, Natalia I.
Brizuela, María Magdalena
Di Stilio, Verónica S.
Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm
title Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm
title_full Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm
title_fullStr Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm
title_full_unstemmed Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm
title_short Distance Dependent Contribution of Ants to Pollination but Not Defense in a Dioecious, Ambophilous Gymnosperm
title_sort distance dependent contribution of ants to pollination but not defense in a dioecious, ambophilous gymnosperm
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34567036
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.722405
work_keys_str_mv AT arandarickertadriana distancedependentcontributionofantstopollinationbutnotdefenseinadioeciousambophilousgymnosperm
AT torrensjavier distancedependentcontributionofantstopollinationbutnotdefenseinadioeciousambophilousgymnosperm
AT yelanataliai distancedependentcontributionofantstopollinationbutnotdefenseinadioeciousambophilousgymnosperm
AT brizuelamariamagdalena distancedependentcontributionofantstopollinationbutnotdefenseinadioeciousambophilousgymnosperm
AT distilioveronicas distancedependentcontributionofantstopollinationbutnotdefenseinadioeciousambophilousgymnosperm