Cargando…

Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography

The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI) on computed tomography (CT) to those on radiographs (XR). A consecutive cohort of 33 patients (45 hips total) being evaluated for hip pain with both XR and CT was examined. Preoperative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nazaroff, Jaron, Mark, Bryan, Learned, James, Wang, Dean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34567600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnab008
_version_ 1784571684141924352
author Nazaroff, Jaron
Mark, Bryan
Learned, James
Wang, Dean
author_facet Nazaroff, Jaron
Mark, Bryan
Learned, James
Wang, Dean
author_sort Nazaroff, Jaron
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI) on computed tomography (CT) to those on radiographs (XR). A consecutive cohort of 33 patients (45 hips total) being evaluated for hip pain with both XR and CT was examined. Preoperative measurements of AWI and PWI were performed utilizing supine anteroposterior pelvic XR and coronal and swiss axial CT scans by two independent raters. Mean differences between XR and CT measurements were compared, and agreement between measurements was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (r(c)) and Bland–Altman analysis. A total of 39 hips in 28 patients were analyzed. The mean patient age was 31.1 ± 9.0 years, and 50% were female. Mean AWI and PWI on XR was 0.50 ± 0.14 and 0.91 ± 0.12, respectively. Measured values of AWI were consistently larger (0.08 ± 0.10, P < 0.01) on XR compared with both coronal and swiss axial CT, with moderate agreement between XR and CT measurements (r(c) = 0.68–0.70). Measured values of PWI were consistently smaller (0.15 ± 0.12, P < 0.05) on XR compared with both coronal and swiss axial CT, with poor agreement between XR and CT measurements (r(c) = 0.37–0.45). Measured values of acetabular wall indices on XR were consistently larger for AWI and smaller for PWI relative to CT. Agreement between XR and CT measures of the indices were moderate to poor. This highlights the need for standardization of XR- and CT-based measurements to improve assessment of acetabular coverage and subsequent clinical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8460168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84601682021-09-24 Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography Nazaroff, Jaron Mark, Bryan Learned, James Wang, Dean J Hip Preserv Surg Research Articles The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI) on computed tomography (CT) to those on radiographs (XR). A consecutive cohort of 33 patients (45 hips total) being evaluated for hip pain with both XR and CT was examined. Preoperative measurements of AWI and PWI were performed utilizing supine anteroposterior pelvic XR and coronal and swiss axial CT scans by two independent raters. Mean differences between XR and CT measurements were compared, and agreement between measurements was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (r(c)) and Bland–Altman analysis. A total of 39 hips in 28 patients were analyzed. The mean patient age was 31.1 ± 9.0 years, and 50% were female. Mean AWI and PWI on XR was 0.50 ± 0.14 and 0.91 ± 0.12, respectively. Measured values of AWI were consistently larger (0.08 ± 0.10, P < 0.01) on XR compared with both coronal and swiss axial CT, with moderate agreement between XR and CT measurements (r(c) = 0.68–0.70). Measured values of PWI were consistently smaller (0.15 ± 0.12, P < 0.05) on XR compared with both coronal and swiss axial CT, with poor agreement between XR and CT measurements (r(c) = 0.37–0.45). Measured values of acetabular wall indices on XR were consistently larger for AWI and smaller for PWI relative to CT. Agreement between XR and CT measures of the indices were moderate to poor. This highlights the need for standardization of XR- and CT-based measurements to improve assessment of acetabular coverage and subsequent clinical decision-making. Oxford University Press 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8460168/ /pubmed/34567600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnab008 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Nazaroff, Jaron
Mark, Bryan
Learned, James
Wang, Dean
Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography
title Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_full Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_fullStr Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_short Measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_sort measurement of acetabular wall indices: comparison between ct and plain radiography
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34567600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnab008
work_keys_str_mv AT nazaroffjaron measurementofacetabularwallindicescomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT markbryan measurementofacetabularwallindicescomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT learnedjames measurementofacetabularwallindicescomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT wangdean measurementofacetabularwallindicescomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography