Cargando…
Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia
BACKGROUND: For esophagectomy, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the standard of care for perioperative pain management. Although effective, TEA is associated with moderate to serious adverse events such as hypotension and neurologic complications. Paravertebral analgesia (PVA) may be a safe alte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1 |
_version_ | 1784571788325289984 |
---|---|
author | Feenstra, Minke L. ten Hoope, Werner Hermanides, Jeroen Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Hollmann, Markus W. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. |
author_facet | Feenstra, Minke L. ten Hoope, Werner Hermanides, Jeroen Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Hollmann, Markus W. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. |
author_sort | Feenstra, Minke L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For esophagectomy, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the standard of care for perioperative pain management. Although effective, TEA is associated with moderate to serious adverse events such as hypotension and neurologic complications. Paravertebral analgesia (PVA) may be a safe alternative. The authors hypothesized that TEA and PVA are similar in efficacy for pain treatment in thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared TEA with PVA in two consecutive series of 25 thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies. In this study, TEA consisted of continuous epidural bupivacaine and sufentanil infusion with a patient-controlled bolus function. In PVA, the catheter was inserted by the surgeon under thoracoscopic vision during surgery. Administration of PVA consisted of continuous paravertebral bupivacaine infusion after a bolus combined with patient-controlled analgesia using intravenous morphine. The primary outcome was the median highest recorded Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) during the 3 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were vasopressor consumption, fluid administration, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In both groups, the median highest recorded NRS was 4 or lower during the first three postoperative days. The patients with PVA had a higher overall NRS (mean difference, 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.49–1.44). No differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: For the patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TEA was superior to PVA, as measured by NRS during the first three postoperative days. However, both modes provided adequate analgesia, with a median highest recorded NRS of 4 or lower. These results could form the basis for a randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8460583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84605832021-10-07 Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia Feenstra, Minke L. ten Hoope, Werner Hermanides, Jeroen Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Hollmann, Markus W. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. Ann Surg Oncol Thoracic Oncology BACKGROUND: For esophagectomy, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the standard of care for perioperative pain management. Although effective, TEA is associated with moderate to serious adverse events such as hypotension and neurologic complications. Paravertebral analgesia (PVA) may be a safe alternative. The authors hypothesized that TEA and PVA are similar in efficacy for pain treatment in thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared TEA with PVA in two consecutive series of 25 thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies. In this study, TEA consisted of continuous epidural bupivacaine and sufentanil infusion with a patient-controlled bolus function. In PVA, the catheter was inserted by the surgeon under thoracoscopic vision during surgery. Administration of PVA consisted of continuous paravertebral bupivacaine infusion after a bolus combined with patient-controlled analgesia using intravenous morphine. The primary outcome was the median highest recorded Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) during the 3 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were vasopressor consumption, fluid administration, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In both groups, the median highest recorded NRS was 4 or lower during the first three postoperative days. The patients with PVA had a higher overall NRS (mean difference, 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.49–1.44). No differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: For the patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TEA was superior to PVA, as measured by NRS during the first three postoperative days. However, both modes provided adequate analgesia, with a median highest recorded NRS of 4 or lower. These results could form the basis for a randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8460583/ /pubmed/34050429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Thoracic Oncology Feenstra, Minke L. ten Hoope, Werner Hermanides, Jeroen Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Hollmann, Markus W. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia |
title | Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia |
title_full | Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia |
title_fullStr | Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia |
title_short | Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia |
title_sort | optimal perioperative pain management in esophageal surgery: an evaluation of paravertebral analgesia |
topic | Thoracic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feenstraminkel optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia AT tenhoopewerner optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia AT hermanidesjeroen optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia AT gisbertzsuzannes optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia AT hollmannmarkusw optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia AT eshuiswietsej optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia |