Cargando…

Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia

BACKGROUND: For esophagectomy, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the standard of care for perioperative pain management. Although effective, TEA is associated with moderate to serious adverse events such as hypotension and neurologic complications. Paravertebral analgesia (PVA) may be a safe alte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feenstra, Minke L., ten Hoope, Werner, Hermanides, Jeroen, Gisbertz, Suzanne S., Hollmann, Markus W., van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I., Eshuis, Wietse J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1
_version_ 1784571788325289984
author Feenstra, Minke L.
ten Hoope, Werner
Hermanides, Jeroen
Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
Hollmann, Markus W.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Eshuis, Wietse J.
author_facet Feenstra, Minke L.
ten Hoope, Werner
Hermanides, Jeroen
Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
Hollmann, Markus W.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Eshuis, Wietse J.
author_sort Feenstra, Minke L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For esophagectomy, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the standard of care for perioperative pain management. Although effective, TEA is associated with moderate to serious adverse events such as hypotension and neurologic complications. Paravertebral analgesia (PVA) may be a safe alternative. The authors hypothesized that TEA and PVA are similar in efficacy for pain treatment in thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared TEA with PVA in two consecutive series of 25 thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies. In this study, TEA consisted of continuous epidural bupivacaine and sufentanil infusion with a patient-controlled bolus function. In PVA, the catheter was inserted by the surgeon under thoracoscopic vision during surgery. Administration of PVA consisted of continuous paravertebral bupivacaine infusion after a bolus combined with patient-controlled analgesia using intravenous morphine. The primary outcome was the median highest recorded Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) during the 3 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were vasopressor consumption, fluid administration, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In both groups, the median highest recorded NRS was 4 or lower during the first three postoperative days. The patients with PVA had a higher overall NRS (mean difference, 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.49–1.44). No differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: For the patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TEA was superior to PVA, as measured by NRS during the first three postoperative days. However, both modes provided adequate analgesia, with a median highest recorded NRS of 4 or lower. These results could form the basis for a randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8460583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84605832021-10-07 Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia Feenstra, Minke L. ten Hoope, Werner Hermanides, Jeroen Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Hollmann, Markus W. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. Ann Surg Oncol Thoracic Oncology BACKGROUND: For esophagectomy, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the standard of care for perioperative pain management. Although effective, TEA is associated with moderate to serious adverse events such as hypotension and neurologic complications. Paravertebral analgesia (PVA) may be a safe alternative. The authors hypothesized that TEA and PVA are similar in efficacy for pain treatment in thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared TEA with PVA in two consecutive series of 25 thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies. In this study, TEA consisted of continuous epidural bupivacaine and sufentanil infusion with a patient-controlled bolus function. In PVA, the catheter was inserted by the surgeon under thoracoscopic vision during surgery. Administration of PVA consisted of continuous paravertebral bupivacaine infusion after a bolus combined with patient-controlled analgesia using intravenous morphine. The primary outcome was the median highest recorded Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) during the 3 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were vasopressor consumption, fluid administration, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In both groups, the median highest recorded NRS was 4 or lower during the first three postoperative days. The patients with PVA had a higher overall NRS (mean difference, 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.49–1.44). No differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: For the patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TEA was superior to PVA, as measured by NRS during the first three postoperative days. However, both modes provided adequate analgesia, with a median highest recorded NRS of 4 or lower. These results could form the basis for a randomized controlled trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8460583/ /pubmed/34050429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Thoracic Oncology
Feenstra, Minke L.
ten Hoope, Werner
Hermanides, Jeroen
Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
Hollmann, Markus W.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Eshuis, Wietse J.
Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia
title Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia
title_full Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia
title_fullStr Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia
title_short Optimal Perioperative Pain Management in Esophageal Surgery: An Evaluation of Paravertebral Analgesia
title_sort optimal perioperative pain management in esophageal surgery: an evaluation of paravertebral analgesia
topic Thoracic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34050429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10172-1
work_keys_str_mv AT feenstraminkel optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia
AT tenhoopewerner optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia
AT hermanidesjeroen optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia
AT gisbertzsuzannes optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia
AT hollmannmarkusw optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia
AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia
AT eshuiswietsej optimalperioperativepainmanagementinesophagealsurgeryanevaluationofparavertebralanalgesia