Cargando…

Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers

Advances in imaging and early cancer detection have increased interest in magnetic resonance (MR) guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technologies for cancer treatment. MRgFUS ablation treatments could reduce surgical risks, preserve organ tissue and function, and improve patient quality of life. How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmerman, Blake E., Johnson, Sara L., Odéen, Henrik A., Shea, Jill E., Factor, Rachel E., Joshi, Sarang C., Payne, Allison H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97309-0
_version_ 1784571816363163648
author Zimmerman, Blake E.
Johnson, Sara L.
Odéen, Henrik A.
Shea, Jill E.
Factor, Rachel E.
Joshi, Sarang C.
Payne, Allison H.
author_facet Zimmerman, Blake E.
Johnson, Sara L.
Odéen, Henrik A.
Shea, Jill E.
Factor, Rachel E.
Joshi, Sarang C.
Payne, Allison H.
author_sort Zimmerman, Blake E.
collection PubMed
description Advances in imaging and early cancer detection have increased interest in magnetic resonance (MR) guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technologies for cancer treatment. MRgFUS ablation treatments could reduce surgical risks, preserve organ tissue and function, and improve patient quality of life. However, surgical resection and histological analysis remain the gold standard to assess cancer treatment response. For non-invasive ablation therapies such as MRgFUS, the treatment response must be determined through MR imaging biomarkers. However, current MR biomarkers are inconclusive and have not been rigorously evaluated against histology via accurate registration. Existing registration methods rely on anatomical features to directly register in vivo MR and histology. For MRgFUS applications in anatomies such as liver, kidney, or breast, anatomical features that are not caused by the treatment are often insufficient to drive direct registration. We present a novel MR to histology registration workflow that utilizes intermediate imaging and does not rely on anatomical MR features being visible in histology. The presented workflow yields an overall registration accuracy of 1.00 ± 0.13 mm. The developed registration pipeline is used to evaluate a common MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarker against histology. Evaluating MR biomarkers against histology using this registration pipeline will facilitate validating novel MRgFUS biomarkers to improve treatment assessment without surgical intervention. While the presented registration technique has been evaluated in a MRgFUS ablation treatment model, this technique could be potentially applied in any tissue to evaluate a variety of therapeutic options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8460731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84607312021-09-27 Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers Zimmerman, Blake E. Johnson, Sara L. Odéen, Henrik A. Shea, Jill E. Factor, Rachel E. Joshi, Sarang C. Payne, Allison H. Sci Rep Article Advances in imaging and early cancer detection have increased interest in magnetic resonance (MR) guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technologies for cancer treatment. MRgFUS ablation treatments could reduce surgical risks, preserve organ tissue and function, and improve patient quality of life. However, surgical resection and histological analysis remain the gold standard to assess cancer treatment response. For non-invasive ablation therapies such as MRgFUS, the treatment response must be determined through MR imaging biomarkers. However, current MR biomarkers are inconclusive and have not been rigorously evaluated against histology via accurate registration. Existing registration methods rely on anatomical features to directly register in vivo MR and histology. For MRgFUS applications in anatomies such as liver, kidney, or breast, anatomical features that are not caused by the treatment are often insufficient to drive direct registration. We present a novel MR to histology registration workflow that utilizes intermediate imaging and does not rely on anatomical MR features being visible in histology. The presented workflow yields an overall registration accuracy of 1.00 ± 0.13 mm. The developed registration pipeline is used to evaluate a common MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarker against histology. Evaluating MR biomarkers against histology using this registration pipeline will facilitate validating novel MRgFUS biomarkers to improve treatment assessment without surgical intervention. While the presented registration technique has been evaluated in a MRgFUS ablation treatment model, this technique could be potentially applied in any tissue to evaluate a variety of therapeutic options. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8460731/ /pubmed/34556678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97309-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zimmerman, Blake E.
Johnson, Sara L.
Odéen, Henrik A.
Shea, Jill E.
Factor, Rachel E.
Joshi, Sarang C.
Payne, Allison H.
Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers
title Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers
title_full Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers
title_fullStr Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers
title_short Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers
title_sort histology to 3d in vivo mr registration for volumetric evaluation of mrgfus treatment assessment biomarkers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97309-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermanblakee histologyto3dinvivomrregistrationforvolumetricevaluationofmrgfustreatmentassessmentbiomarkers
AT johnsonsaral histologyto3dinvivomrregistrationforvolumetricevaluationofmrgfustreatmentassessmentbiomarkers
AT odeenhenrika histologyto3dinvivomrregistrationforvolumetricevaluationofmrgfustreatmentassessmentbiomarkers
AT sheajille histologyto3dinvivomrregistrationforvolumetricevaluationofmrgfustreatmentassessmentbiomarkers
AT factorrachele histologyto3dinvivomrregistrationforvolumetricevaluationofmrgfustreatmentassessmentbiomarkers
AT joshisarangc histologyto3dinvivomrregistrationforvolumetricevaluationofmrgfustreatmentassessmentbiomarkers
AT payneallisonh histologyto3dinvivomrregistrationforvolumetricevaluationofmrgfustreatmentassessmentbiomarkers