Cargando…
Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review
Objectives: To systematically review studies on the effect of treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Data Sources: We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, after which additional studies were hand searched using Scopus databases. The methods are described in the study protocol...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.726803 |
_version_ | 1784571823185199104 |
---|---|
author | Dullaart, Max J. Kip, Marijn Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge |
author_facet | Dullaart, Max J. Kip, Marijn Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge |
author_sort | Dullaart, Max J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: To systematically review studies on the effect of treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Data Sources: We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, after which additional studies were hand searched using Scopus databases. The methods are described in the study protocol, which has been registered in the PROSPERO register. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this study. Eligibility Criteria: We considered for inclusion randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports, and case series, with tinnitus as primary outcome in children (0–18 years old) with acute or chronic subjective tinnitus. We excluded studies in which both children and adults participated but outcomes were not specifically reported for children, as well as animal studies, studies with a non-original study design and studies about children with pulsatile or objective tinnitus. Data Selection: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and quality, collected and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed in case of homogeneous outcomes. Results: The search yielded a total of 4,447 studies. Of these, 147 eligible studies were selected. One case report and five observational studies met the eligibility criteria. Three studies applied counseling and (simplified-)TRT and reported improvement in tinnitus outcome in 68 out of 82 children after 3–6 months of treatment. Two studies used pharmacological treatments and reported improvement in 74 out of 86 patients after 10 days to 3 months of treatment. One study reported the outcome of biofeedback therapy, describing an improvement in tinnitus loudness and annoyance after 2 months of treatment. Conclusion: Due to the high risk of bias of the included studies, we cannot determine the effectiveness of the treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Also, owing to brief follow-up periods, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding long-term effects. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are necessary to provide substantial evidence of the effects of therapies for children affected by tinnitus. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42020178134]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8460757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84607572021-09-25 Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review Dullaart, Max J. Kip, Marijn Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge Front Neurol Neurology Objectives: To systematically review studies on the effect of treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Data Sources: We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, after which additional studies were hand searched using Scopus databases. The methods are described in the study protocol, which has been registered in the PROSPERO register. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this study. Eligibility Criteria: We considered for inclusion randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports, and case series, with tinnitus as primary outcome in children (0–18 years old) with acute or chronic subjective tinnitus. We excluded studies in which both children and adults participated but outcomes were not specifically reported for children, as well as animal studies, studies with a non-original study design and studies about children with pulsatile or objective tinnitus. Data Selection: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and quality, collected and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed in case of homogeneous outcomes. Results: The search yielded a total of 4,447 studies. Of these, 147 eligible studies were selected. One case report and five observational studies met the eligibility criteria. Three studies applied counseling and (simplified-)TRT and reported improvement in tinnitus outcome in 68 out of 82 children after 3–6 months of treatment. Two studies used pharmacological treatments and reported improvement in 74 out of 86 patients after 10 days to 3 months of treatment. One study reported the outcome of biofeedback therapy, describing an improvement in tinnitus loudness and annoyance after 2 months of treatment. Conclusion: Due to the high risk of bias of the included studies, we cannot determine the effectiveness of the treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Also, owing to brief follow-up periods, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding long-term effects. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are necessary to provide substantial evidence of the effects of therapies for children affected by tinnitus. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42020178134]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8460757/ /pubmed/34566871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.726803 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dullaart, Kip, Smit and Stegeman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Dullaart, Max J. Kip, Marijn Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review |
title | Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review |
title_full | Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review |
title_short | Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | treatment of tinnitus in children—a systematic review |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.726803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dullaartmaxj treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview AT kipmarijn treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview AT smitadrianal treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview AT stegemaninge treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview |