Cargando…

Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review

Objectives: To systematically review studies on the effect of treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Data Sources: We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, after which additional studies were hand searched using Scopus databases. The methods are described in the study protocol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dullaart, Max J., Kip, Marijn, Smit, Adriana L., Stegeman, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.726803
_version_ 1784571823185199104
author Dullaart, Max J.
Kip, Marijn
Smit, Adriana L.
Stegeman, Inge
author_facet Dullaart, Max J.
Kip, Marijn
Smit, Adriana L.
Stegeman, Inge
author_sort Dullaart, Max J.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To systematically review studies on the effect of treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Data Sources: We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, after which additional studies were hand searched using Scopus databases. The methods are described in the study protocol, which has been registered in the PROSPERO register. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this study. Eligibility Criteria: We considered for inclusion randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports, and case series, with tinnitus as primary outcome in children (0–18 years old) with acute or chronic subjective tinnitus. We excluded studies in which both children and adults participated but outcomes were not specifically reported for children, as well as animal studies, studies with a non-original study design and studies about children with pulsatile or objective tinnitus. Data Selection: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and quality, collected and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed in case of homogeneous outcomes. Results: The search yielded a total of 4,447 studies. Of these, 147 eligible studies were selected. One case report and five observational studies met the eligibility criteria. Three studies applied counseling and (simplified-)TRT and reported improvement in tinnitus outcome in 68 out of 82 children after 3–6 months of treatment. Two studies used pharmacological treatments and reported improvement in 74 out of 86 patients after 10 days to 3 months of treatment. One study reported the outcome of biofeedback therapy, describing an improvement in tinnitus loudness and annoyance after 2 months of treatment. Conclusion: Due to the high risk of bias of the included studies, we cannot determine the effectiveness of the treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Also, owing to brief follow-up periods, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding long-term effects. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are necessary to provide substantial evidence of the effects of therapies for children affected by tinnitus. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42020178134].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8460757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84607572021-09-25 Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review Dullaart, Max J. Kip, Marijn Smit, Adriana L. Stegeman, Inge Front Neurol Neurology Objectives: To systematically review studies on the effect of treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Data Sources: We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, after which additional studies were hand searched using Scopus databases. The methods are described in the study protocol, which has been registered in the PROSPERO register. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this study. Eligibility Criteria: We considered for inclusion randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports, and case series, with tinnitus as primary outcome in children (0–18 years old) with acute or chronic subjective tinnitus. We excluded studies in which both children and adults participated but outcomes were not specifically reported for children, as well as animal studies, studies with a non-original study design and studies about children with pulsatile or objective tinnitus. Data Selection: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and quality, collected and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed in case of homogeneous outcomes. Results: The search yielded a total of 4,447 studies. Of these, 147 eligible studies were selected. One case report and five observational studies met the eligibility criteria. Three studies applied counseling and (simplified-)TRT and reported improvement in tinnitus outcome in 68 out of 82 children after 3–6 months of treatment. Two studies used pharmacological treatments and reported improvement in 74 out of 86 patients after 10 days to 3 months of treatment. One study reported the outcome of biofeedback therapy, describing an improvement in tinnitus loudness and annoyance after 2 months of treatment. Conclusion: Due to the high risk of bias of the included studies, we cannot determine the effectiveness of the treatment of subjective tinnitus in children. Also, owing to brief follow-up periods, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding long-term effects. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are necessary to provide substantial evidence of the effects of therapies for children affected by tinnitus. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42020178134]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8460757/ /pubmed/34566871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.726803 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dullaart, Kip, Smit and Stegeman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Dullaart, Max J.
Kip, Marijn
Smit, Adriana L.
Stegeman, Inge
Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review
title Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review
title_full Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review
title_short Treatment of Tinnitus in Children—A Systematic Review
title_sort treatment of tinnitus in children—a systematic review
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.726803
work_keys_str_mv AT dullaartmaxj treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview
AT kipmarijn treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview
AT smitadrianal treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview
AT stegemaninge treatmentoftinnitusinchildrenasystematicreview