Cargando…

Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer

The standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy with chemoradiation in select patients. Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a reliable predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Jasmeet, Choi, Woonyoung, Geynisman, Daniel M., Plimack, Elizabeth R., Ghatalia, Pooja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34567274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211045858
_version_ 1784571912763998208
author Kaur, Jasmeet
Choi, Woonyoung
Geynisman, Daniel M.
Plimack, Elizabeth R.
Ghatalia, Pooja
author_facet Kaur, Jasmeet
Choi, Woonyoung
Geynisman, Daniel M.
Plimack, Elizabeth R.
Ghatalia, Pooja
author_sort Kaur, Jasmeet
collection PubMed
description The standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy with chemoradiation in select patients. Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a reliable predictor of overall and disease-specific survival in MIBC. A pCR rate of 35–40% is attained with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. With the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer, these agents are now being studied in the neoadjuvant setting for MIBC. We describe the results from clinical trials using single agent ICI, ICI/ICI and ICI/chemotherapy combination therapies in the neoadjuvant setting for MIBC. These single-arm clinical trials have demonstrated safety and pCR comparable to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant ICI is a promising approach for cisplatin-ineligible patients, and the role of adding ICIs to cisplatin-based chemotherapy is also being investigated in randomized phase III clinical trials. Ongoing biomarker research to suggest a response to neoadjuvant ICIs will also guide appropriate treatment selection. We also describe the studies using ICIs for adjuvant therapy and in combination with chemoradiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84611262021-09-25 Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer Kaur, Jasmeet Choi, Woonyoung Geynisman, Daniel M. Plimack, Elizabeth R. Ghatalia, Pooja Ther Adv Med Oncol Review The standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy with chemoradiation in select patients. Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a reliable predictor of overall and disease-specific survival in MIBC. A pCR rate of 35–40% is attained with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. With the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer, these agents are now being studied in the neoadjuvant setting for MIBC. We describe the results from clinical trials using single agent ICI, ICI/ICI and ICI/chemotherapy combination therapies in the neoadjuvant setting for MIBC. These single-arm clinical trials have demonstrated safety and pCR comparable to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant ICI is a promising approach for cisplatin-ineligible patients, and the role of adding ICIs to cisplatin-based chemotherapy is also being investigated in randomized phase III clinical trials. Ongoing biomarker research to suggest a response to neoadjuvant ICIs will also guide appropriate treatment selection. We also describe the studies using ICIs for adjuvant therapy and in combination with chemoradiation. SAGE Publications 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8461126/ /pubmed/34567274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211045858 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Kaur, Jasmeet
Choi, Woonyoung
Geynisman, Daniel M.
Plimack, Elizabeth R.
Ghatalia, Pooja
Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer
title Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer
title_full Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer
title_fullStr Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer
title_full_unstemmed Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer
title_short Role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer
title_sort role of immunotherapy in localized muscle invasive urothelial cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34567274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211045858
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurjasmeet roleofimmunotherapyinlocalizedmuscleinvasiveurothelialcancer
AT choiwoonyoung roleofimmunotherapyinlocalizedmuscleinvasiveurothelialcancer
AT geynismandanielm roleofimmunotherapyinlocalizedmuscleinvasiveurothelialcancer
AT plimackelizabethr roleofimmunotherapyinlocalizedmuscleinvasiveurothelialcancer
AT ghataliapooja roleofimmunotherapyinlocalizedmuscleinvasiveurothelialcancer