Cargando…

Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs

Background: The incidence of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is as high as 10%. It is also partially determined by the distribution of perfusion. During thoracic surgery, different body positions are used, such as the supine, semilateral, lateral, and prone positions, with such positions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittenstein, Jakob, Scharffenberg, Martin, Ran, Xi, Zhang, Yingying, Keller, Diana, Tauer, Sebastian, Theilen, Raphael, Chai, Yusen, Ferreira, Jorge, Müller, Sabine, Bluth, Thomas, Kiss, Thomas, Schultz, Marcus J., Rocco, Patricia R. M., Pelosi, Paolo, Gama de Abreu, Marcelo, Huhle, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566683
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.717269
_version_ 1784571922064867328
author Wittenstein, Jakob
Scharffenberg, Martin
Ran, Xi
Zhang, Yingying
Keller, Diana
Tauer, Sebastian
Theilen, Raphael
Chai, Yusen
Ferreira, Jorge
Müller, Sabine
Bluth, Thomas
Kiss, Thomas
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Pelosi, Paolo
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Huhle, Robert
author_facet Wittenstein, Jakob
Scharffenberg, Martin
Ran, Xi
Zhang, Yingying
Keller, Diana
Tauer, Sebastian
Theilen, Raphael
Chai, Yusen
Ferreira, Jorge
Müller, Sabine
Bluth, Thomas
Kiss, Thomas
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Pelosi, Paolo
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Huhle, Robert
author_sort Wittenstein, Jakob
collection PubMed
description Background: The incidence of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is as high as 10%. It is also partially determined by the distribution of perfusion. During thoracic surgery, different body positions are used, such as the supine, semilateral, lateral, and prone positions, with such positions potentially influencing the distribution of perfusion. Furthermore, hypovolemia can impair hypoxic vasoconstriction. However, the effects of body position and hypovolemia on the distribution of perfusion remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that, during OLV, the relative perfusion of the ventilated lung is higher in the lateral decubitus position and that hypovolemia impairs the redistribution of pulmonary blood flow. Methods: Sixteen juvenile pigs were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, submitted to a right-sided thoracotomy, and randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) intravascular normovolemia or (2) intravascular hypovolemia, as achieved by drawing ~25% of the estimated blood volume (n = 8/group). Furthermore, to mimic thoracic surgery inflammatory conditions, Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide was continuously infused at 0.5 μg kg(−1) h(−1). Under left-sided OLV conditions, the animals were further randomized to one of the four sequences of supine, left semilateral, left lateral, and prone positioning. Measurements of pulmonary perfusion distribution with fluorescence-marked microspheres, ventilation distribution by electrical impedance tomography, and gas exchange were then performed during two-lung ventilation in a supine position and after 30 min in each position and intravascular volume status during OLV. Results: During one-lung ventilation, the relative perfusion of the ventilated lung was higher in the lateral than the supine position. The relative perfusion of the non-ventilated lung was lower in the lateral than the supine and prone positions and in semilateral compared with the prone position. During OLV, the highest arterial partial pressure of oxygen/inspiratory fraction of oxygen (PaO(2)/F(I)O(2)) was achieved in the lateral position as compared with all the other positions. The distribution of perfusion, ventilation, and oxygenation did not differ significantly between normovolemia and hypovolemia. Conclusions: During one-lung ventilation in endotoxemic pigs, the relative perfusion of the ventilated lung and oxygenation were higher in the lateral than in the supine position and not impaired by hypovolemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84611762021-09-25 Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs Wittenstein, Jakob Scharffenberg, Martin Ran, Xi Zhang, Yingying Keller, Diana Tauer, Sebastian Theilen, Raphael Chai, Yusen Ferreira, Jorge Müller, Sabine Bluth, Thomas Kiss, Thomas Schultz, Marcus J. Rocco, Patricia R. M. Pelosi, Paolo Gama de Abreu, Marcelo Huhle, Robert Front Physiol Physiology Background: The incidence of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is as high as 10%. It is also partially determined by the distribution of perfusion. During thoracic surgery, different body positions are used, such as the supine, semilateral, lateral, and prone positions, with such positions potentially influencing the distribution of perfusion. Furthermore, hypovolemia can impair hypoxic vasoconstriction. However, the effects of body position and hypovolemia on the distribution of perfusion remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that, during OLV, the relative perfusion of the ventilated lung is higher in the lateral decubitus position and that hypovolemia impairs the redistribution of pulmonary blood flow. Methods: Sixteen juvenile pigs were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, submitted to a right-sided thoracotomy, and randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) intravascular normovolemia or (2) intravascular hypovolemia, as achieved by drawing ~25% of the estimated blood volume (n = 8/group). Furthermore, to mimic thoracic surgery inflammatory conditions, Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide was continuously infused at 0.5 μg kg(−1) h(−1). Under left-sided OLV conditions, the animals were further randomized to one of the four sequences of supine, left semilateral, left lateral, and prone positioning. Measurements of pulmonary perfusion distribution with fluorescence-marked microspheres, ventilation distribution by electrical impedance tomography, and gas exchange were then performed during two-lung ventilation in a supine position and after 30 min in each position and intravascular volume status during OLV. Results: During one-lung ventilation, the relative perfusion of the ventilated lung was higher in the lateral than the supine position. The relative perfusion of the non-ventilated lung was lower in the lateral than the supine and prone positions and in semilateral compared with the prone position. During OLV, the highest arterial partial pressure of oxygen/inspiratory fraction of oxygen (PaO(2)/F(I)O(2)) was achieved in the lateral position as compared with all the other positions. The distribution of perfusion, ventilation, and oxygenation did not differ significantly between normovolemia and hypovolemia. Conclusions: During one-lung ventilation in endotoxemic pigs, the relative perfusion of the ventilated lung and oxygenation were higher in the lateral than in the supine position and not impaired by hypovolemia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8461176/ /pubmed/34566683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.717269 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wittenstein, Scharffenberg, Ran, Zhang, Keller, Tauer, Theilen, Chai, Ferreira, Müller, Bluth, Kiss, Schultz, Rocco, Pelosi, Gama de Abreu and Huhle. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Wittenstein, Jakob
Scharffenberg, Martin
Ran, Xi
Zhang, Yingying
Keller, Diana
Tauer, Sebastian
Theilen, Raphael
Chai, Yusen
Ferreira, Jorge
Müller, Sabine
Bluth, Thomas
Kiss, Thomas
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Pelosi, Paolo
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Huhle, Robert
Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs
title Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs
title_full Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs
title_fullStr Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs
title_short Effects of Body Position and Hypovolemia on the Regional Distribution of Pulmonary Perfusion During One-Lung Ventilation in Endotoxemic Pigs
title_sort effects of body position and hypovolemia on the regional distribution of pulmonary perfusion during one-lung ventilation in endotoxemic pigs
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566683
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.717269
work_keys_str_mv AT wittensteinjakob effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT scharffenbergmartin effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT ranxi effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT zhangyingying effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT kellerdiana effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT tauersebastian effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT theilenraphael effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT chaiyusen effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT ferreirajorge effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT mullersabine effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT bluththomas effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT kissthomas effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT schultzmarcusj effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT roccopatriciarm effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT pelosipaolo effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT gamadeabreumarcelo effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs
AT huhlerobert effectsofbodypositionandhypovolemiaontheregionaldistributionofpulmonaryperfusionduringonelungventilationinendotoxemicpigs