Cargando…

Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center

OBJECTIVE: Despite growing expertise and wide application of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of different origin and during pandemics (H1N1 Influenza A virus and SARS-CoV-2), large reports are few and pertain mostly to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieri, Marina, Donatelli, Vittoria, Calabrò, Maria Grazia, Scandroglio, Anna Mara, Pappalardo, Federico, Zangrillo, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.029
_version_ 1784571940315332608
author Pieri, Marina
Donatelli, Vittoria
Calabrò, Maria Grazia
Scandroglio, Anna Mara
Pappalardo, Federico
Zangrillo, Alberto
author_facet Pieri, Marina
Donatelli, Vittoria
Calabrò, Maria Grazia
Scandroglio, Anna Mara
Pappalardo, Federico
Zangrillo, Alberto
author_sort Pieri, Marina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Despite growing expertise and wide application of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of different origin and during pandemics (H1N1 Influenza A virus and SARS-CoV-2), large reports are few and pertain mostly to multicenter registries, and randomized trials are difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to report outcomes, trends, and innovations of VV ECMO treatment over the last 11 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study on 142 patients treated at the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital in Milan from June 2009 (year of the H1N1 pandemic) to May 2020 (SARS-CoV-2 pandemic). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main causes of ARDS were H1N1 pneumonia in 36% of patients, bacterial pneumonia in 17%, and SARS-CoV-2 in 9%. Seventy-two percent of patients were centralized from remote hospitals, of whom 33% had implanted VV ECMO before transport. The most common cannulation strategy was the dual-lumen catheter cannulation system (55%), and anticoagulation was performed with bivalirudin in most patients (79%). Refractory hypoxia was treated with intravenous beta-blockers (64%), nitric oxide (20%), and pronation (8%). Almost one-third of patients (32%) were extubated while on ECMO. Forty-nine percent of patients were discharged from the intensive care unit, and hospital discharge was 46%; survival was lower in patients requiring VV ECMO for more than three weeks compared with shorter support duration (23% v 56%, p = 0.007). Anticoagulation with bivalirudin was associated with higher survival, compared with heparin (55% v 31%, p = 0.03), and lower thrombocytopenia incidence (69% v 35%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: VV ECMO is the pivotal rescue treatment for refractory ARDS—timely treatment and optimal care are needed to optimize therapy, as duration of support is associated with outcome. Anticoagulation with bivalirudin may improve outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84612662021-09-24 Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center Pieri, Marina Donatelli, Vittoria Calabrò, Maria Grazia Scandroglio, Anna Mara Pappalardo, Federico Zangrillo, Alberto J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Original Article OBJECTIVE: Despite growing expertise and wide application of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of different origin and during pandemics (H1N1 Influenza A virus and SARS-CoV-2), large reports are few and pertain mostly to multicenter registries, and randomized trials are difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to report outcomes, trends, and innovations of VV ECMO treatment over the last 11 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study on 142 patients treated at the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital in Milan from June 2009 (year of the H1N1 pandemic) to May 2020 (SARS-CoV-2 pandemic). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main causes of ARDS were H1N1 pneumonia in 36% of patients, bacterial pneumonia in 17%, and SARS-CoV-2 in 9%. Seventy-two percent of patients were centralized from remote hospitals, of whom 33% had implanted VV ECMO before transport. The most common cannulation strategy was the dual-lumen catheter cannulation system (55%), and anticoagulation was performed with bivalirudin in most patients (79%). Refractory hypoxia was treated with intravenous beta-blockers (64%), nitric oxide (20%), and pronation (8%). Almost one-third of patients (32%) were extubated while on ECMO. Forty-nine percent of patients were discharged from the intensive care unit, and hospital discharge was 46%; survival was lower in patients requiring VV ECMO for more than three weeks compared with shorter support duration (23% v 56%, p = 0.007). Anticoagulation with bivalirudin was associated with higher survival, compared with heparin (55% v 31%, p = 0.03), and lower thrombocytopenia incidence (69% v 35%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: VV ECMO is the pivotal rescue treatment for refractory ARDS—timely treatment and optimal care are needed to optimize therapy, as duration of support is associated with outcome. Anticoagulation with bivalirudin may improve outcome. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-06 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8461266/ /pubmed/34686438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.029 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pieri, Marina
Donatelli, Vittoria
Calabrò, Maria Grazia
Scandroglio, Anna Mara
Pappalardo, Federico
Zangrillo, Alberto
Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center
title Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center
title_full Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center
title_fullStr Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center
title_full_unstemmed Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center
title_short Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center
title_sort eleven years of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: from h1n1 to sars-cov-2. experience and perspectives of a national referral center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.029
work_keys_str_mv AT pierimarina elevenyearsofvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromefromh1n1tosarscov2experienceandperspectivesofanationalreferralcenter
AT donatellivittoria elevenyearsofvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromefromh1n1tosarscov2experienceandperspectivesofanationalreferralcenter
AT calabromariagrazia elevenyearsofvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromefromh1n1tosarscov2experienceandperspectivesofanationalreferralcenter
AT scandroglioannamara elevenyearsofvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromefromh1n1tosarscov2experienceandperspectivesofanationalreferralcenter
AT pappalardofederico elevenyearsofvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromefromh1n1tosarscov2experienceandperspectivesofanationalreferralcenter
AT zangrilloalberto elevenyearsofvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromefromh1n1tosarscov2experienceandperspectivesofanationalreferralcenter