Cargando…

Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the biomedical literature makes identifying strong evidence a time-consuming task. Applying machine learning to the process could be a viable solution that limits effort while maintaining accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to summarize the nature and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelkader, Wael, Navarro, Tamara, Parrish, Rick, Cotoi, Chris, Germini, Federico, Iorio, Alfonso, Haynes, R Brian, Lokker, Cynthia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499041
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30401
_version_ 1784572006958628864
author Abdelkader, Wael
Navarro, Tamara
Parrish, Rick
Cotoi, Chris
Germini, Federico
Iorio, Alfonso
Haynes, R Brian
Lokker, Cynthia
author_facet Abdelkader, Wael
Navarro, Tamara
Parrish, Rick
Cotoi, Chris
Germini, Federico
Iorio, Alfonso
Haynes, R Brian
Lokker, Cynthia
author_sort Abdelkader, Wael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the biomedical literature makes identifying strong evidence a time-consuming task. Applying machine learning to the process could be a viable solution that limits effort while maintaining accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to summarize the nature and comparative performance of machine learning approaches that have been applied to retrieve high-quality evidence for clinical consideration from the biomedical literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies that applied machine learning techniques to identify high-quality clinical articles in the biomedical literature. Multiple databases were searched to July 2020. Extracted data focused on the applied machine learning model, steps in the development of the models, and model performance. RESULTS: From 3918 retrieved studies, 10 met our inclusion criteria. All followed a supervised machine learning approach and applied, from a limited range of options, a high-quality standard for the training of their model. The results show that machine learning can achieve a sensitivity of 95% while maintaining a high precision of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning approaches perform well in retrieving high-quality clinical studies. Performance may improve by applying more sophisticated approaches such as active learning and unsupervised machine learning approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84615272021-10-18 Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review Abdelkader, Wael Navarro, Tamara Parrish, Rick Cotoi, Chris Germini, Federico Iorio, Alfonso Haynes, R Brian Lokker, Cynthia JMIR Med Inform Review BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the biomedical literature makes identifying strong evidence a time-consuming task. Applying machine learning to the process could be a viable solution that limits effort while maintaining accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to summarize the nature and comparative performance of machine learning approaches that have been applied to retrieve high-quality evidence for clinical consideration from the biomedical literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies that applied machine learning techniques to identify high-quality clinical articles in the biomedical literature. Multiple databases were searched to July 2020. Extracted data focused on the applied machine learning model, steps in the development of the models, and model performance. RESULTS: From 3918 retrieved studies, 10 met our inclusion criteria. All followed a supervised machine learning approach and applied, from a limited range of options, a high-quality standard for the training of their model. The results show that machine learning can achieve a sensitivity of 95% while maintaining a high precision of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning approaches perform well in retrieving high-quality clinical studies. Performance may improve by applying more sophisticated approaches such as active learning and unsupervised machine learning approaches. JMIR Publications 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8461527/ /pubmed/34499041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30401 Text en ©Wael Abdelkader, Tamara Navarro, Rick Parrish, Chris Cotoi, Federico Germini, Alfonso Iorio, R Brian Haynes, Cynthia Lokker. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 09.09.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Abdelkader, Wael
Navarro, Tamara
Parrish, Rick
Cotoi, Chris
Germini, Federico
Iorio, Alfonso
Haynes, R Brian
Lokker, Cynthia
Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
title Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
title_full Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
title_short Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
title_sort machine learning approaches to retrieve high-quality, clinically relevant evidence from the biomedical literature: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499041
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30401
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelkaderwael machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview
AT navarrotamara machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview
AT parrishrick machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview
AT cotoichris machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview
AT germinifederico machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview
AT iorioalfonso machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview
AT haynesrbrian machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview
AT lokkercynthia machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview