Cargando…
Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the biomedical literature makes identifying strong evidence a time-consuming task. Applying machine learning to the process could be a viable solution that limits effort while maintaining accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to summarize the nature and co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30401 |
_version_ | 1784572006958628864 |
---|---|
author | Abdelkader, Wael Navarro, Tamara Parrish, Rick Cotoi, Chris Germini, Federico Iorio, Alfonso Haynes, R Brian Lokker, Cynthia |
author_facet | Abdelkader, Wael Navarro, Tamara Parrish, Rick Cotoi, Chris Germini, Federico Iorio, Alfonso Haynes, R Brian Lokker, Cynthia |
author_sort | Abdelkader, Wael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the biomedical literature makes identifying strong evidence a time-consuming task. Applying machine learning to the process could be a viable solution that limits effort while maintaining accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to summarize the nature and comparative performance of machine learning approaches that have been applied to retrieve high-quality evidence for clinical consideration from the biomedical literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies that applied machine learning techniques to identify high-quality clinical articles in the biomedical literature. Multiple databases were searched to July 2020. Extracted data focused on the applied machine learning model, steps in the development of the models, and model performance. RESULTS: From 3918 retrieved studies, 10 met our inclusion criteria. All followed a supervised machine learning approach and applied, from a limited range of options, a high-quality standard for the training of their model. The results show that machine learning can achieve a sensitivity of 95% while maintaining a high precision of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning approaches perform well in retrieving high-quality clinical studies. Performance may improve by applying more sophisticated approaches such as active learning and unsupervised machine learning approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8461527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84615272021-10-18 Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review Abdelkader, Wael Navarro, Tamara Parrish, Rick Cotoi, Chris Germini, Federico Iorio, Alfonso Haynes, R Brian Lokker, Cynthia JMIR Med Inform Review BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of the biomedical literature makes identifying strong evidence a time-consuming task. Applying machine learning to the process could be a viable solution that limits effort while maintaining accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to summarize the nature and comparative performance of machine learning approaches that have been applied to retrieve high-quality evidence for clinical consideration from the biomedical literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies that applied machine learning techniques to identify high-quality clinical articles in the biomedical literature. Multiple databases were searched to July 2020. Extracted data focused on the applied machine learning model, steps in the development of the models, and model performance. RESULTS: From 3918 retrieved studies, 10 met our inclusion criteria. All followed a supervised machine learning approach and applied, from a limited range of options, a high-quality standard for the training of their model. The results show that machine learning can achieve a sensitivity of 95% while maintaining a high precision of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning approaches perform well in retrieving high-quality clinical studies. Performance may improve by applying more sophisticated approaches such as active learning and unsupervised machine learning approaches. JMIR Publications 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8461527/ /pubmed/34499041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30401 Text en ©Wael Abdelkader, Tamara Navarro, Rick Parrish, Chris Cotoi, Federico Germini, Alfonso Iorio, R Brian Haynes, Cynthia Lokker. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 09.09.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Abdelkader, Wael Navarro, Tamara Parrish, Rick Cotoi, Chris Germini, Federico Iorio, Alfonso Haynes, R Brian Lokker, Cynthia Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review |
title | Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review |
title_full | Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review |
title_short | Machine Learning Approaches to Retrieve High-Quality, Clinically Relevant Evidence From the Biomedical Literature: Systematic Review |
title_sort | machine learning approaches to retrieve high-quality, clinically relevant evidence from the biomedical literature: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34499041 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelkaderwael machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview AT navarrotamara machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview AT parrishrick machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview AT cotoichris machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview AT germinifederico machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview AT iorioalfonso machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview AT haynesrbrian machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview AT lokkercynthia machinelearningapproachestoretrievehighqualityclinicallyrelevantevidencefromthebiomedicalliteraturesystematicreview |