Cargando…

Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters

[Image: see text] Localized photothermal therapy (PTT) has been demonstrated to be a promising method of combating cancer, that additionally synergistically enhances other treatment modalities such as photodynamic therapy or chemotherapy. PTT exploits nanoparticles (called nanoheaters), that upon pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paściak, Agnieszka, Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra, Marciniak, Łukasz, Schuck, P. James, Bednarkiewicz, Artur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34498862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12409
_version_ 1784572022666297344
author Paściak, Agnieszka
Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra
Marciniak, Łukasz
Schuck, P. James
Bednarkiewicz, Artur
author_facet Paściak, Agnieszka
Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra
Marciniak, Łukasz
Schuck, P. James
Bednarkiewicz, Artur
author_sort Paściak, Agnieszka
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Localized photothermal therapy (PTT) has been demonstrated to be a promising method of combating cancer, that additionally synergistically enhances other treatment modalities such as photodynamic therapy or chemotherapy. PTT exploits nanoparticles (called nanoheaters), that upon proper biofunctionalization may target cancerous tissues, and under light stimulation may convert the energy of photons to heat, leading to local overheating and treatment of cancerous cells. Despite extensive work, there is, however, no agreement on how to accurately and quantitatively compare light-to-heat conversion efficiency (η(Q)) and rank the nanoheating performances of various groups of nanomaterials. This disagreement is highly problematic because the obtained η(Q) values, measured with various methods, differ significantly for similar nanomaterials. In this work, we experimentally review existing optical setups, methods, and physical models used to evaluate η(Q). In order to draw a binding conclusion, we cross-check and critically evaluate the same Au@SiO(2) sample in various experimental conditions. This critical study let us additionally compare and understand the influence of the other experimental factors, such as stirring, data recording and analysis, and assumptions on the effective mass of the system, in order to determine η(Q) in a most straightforward and reproducible way. Our goal is therefore to contribute to the understanding, standardization, and reliable evaluation of η(Q) measurements, aiming to accurately rank various nanoheater platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84616042021-09-24 Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters Paściak, Agnieszka Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra Marciniak, Łukasz Schuck, P. James Bednarkiewicz, Artur ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Localized photothermal therapy (PTT) has been demonstrated to be a promising method of combating cancer, that additionally synergistically enhances other treatment modalities such as photodynamic therapy or chemotherapy. PTT exploits nanoparticles (called nanoheaters), that upon proper biofunctionalization may target cancerous tissues, and under light stimulation may convert the energy of photons to heat, leading to local overheating and treatment of cancerous cells. Despite extensive work, there is, however, no agreement on how to accurately and quantitatively compare light-to-heat conversion efficiency (η(Q)) and rank the nanoheating performances of various groups of nanomaterials. This disagreement is highly problematic because the obtained η(Q) values, measured with various methods, differ significantly for similar nanomaterials. In this work, we experimentally review existing optical setups, methods, and physical models used to evaluate η(Q). In order to draw a binding conclusion, we cross-check and critically evaluate the same Au@SiO(2) sample in various experimental conditions. This critical study let us additionally compare and understand the influence of the other experimental factors, such as stirring, data recording and analysis, and assumptions on the effective mass of the system, in order to determine η(Q) in a most straightforward and reproducible way. Our goal is therefore to contribute to the understanding, standardization, and reliable evaluation of η(Q) measurements, aiming to accurately rank various nanoheater platforms. American Chemical Society 2021-09-09 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8461604/ /pubmed/34498862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12409 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Paściak, Agnieszka
Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra
Marciniak, Łukasz
Schuck, P. James
Bednarkiewicz, Artur
Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters
title Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters
title_full Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters
title_fullStr Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters
title_full_unstemmed Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters
title_short Standardization of Methodology of Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency Determination for Colloidal Nanoheaters
title_sort standardization of methodology of light-to-heat conversion efficiency determination for colloidal nanoheaters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34498862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12409
work_keys_str_mv AT pasciakagnieszka standardizationofmethodologyoflighttoheatconversionefficiencydeterminationforcolloidalnanoheaters
AT pilchwrobelaleksandra standardizationofmethodologyoflighttoheatconversionefficiencydeterminationforcolloidalnanoheaters
AT marciniakłukasz standardizationofmethodologyoflighttoheatconversionefficiencydeterminationforcolloidalnanoheaters
AT schuckpjames standardizationofmethodologyoflighttoheatconversionefficiencydeterminationforcolloidalnanoheaters
AT bednarkiewiczartur standardizationofmethodologyoflighttoheatconversionefficiencydeterminationforcolloidalnanoheaters