Cargando…

Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)

BACKGROUND: Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke. OBJECTIVE: We explored differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Räty, Silja, Borrmann, Carolin, Granata, Giuseppe, Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth, Schoenfeld, Ariel, Sailer, Michael, Silvennoinen, Katri, Holopainen, Juha, De Rossi, Francesca, Antal, Andrea, Rossini, Paolo M., Tatlisumak, Turgut, Sabel, Bernhard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219679
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211198
_version_ 1784572038133841920
author Räty, Silja
Borrmann, Carolin
Granata, Giuseppe
Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth
Schoenfeld, Ariel
Sailer, Michael
Silvennoinen, Katri
Holopainen, Juha
De Rossi, Francesca
Antal, Andrea
Rossini, Paolo M.
Tatlisumak, Turgut
Sabel, Bernhard A.
author_facet Räty, Silja
Borrmann, Carolin
Granata, Giuseppe
Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth
Schoenfeld, Ariel
Sailer, Michael
Silvennoinen, Katri
Holopainen, Juha
De Rossi, Francesca
Antal, Andrea
Rossini, Paolo M.
Tatlisumak, Turgut
Sabel, Bernhard A.
author_sort Räty, Silja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke. OBJECTIVE: We explored different NIBS modalities for rehabilitation of hemianopia after chronic stroke. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed trial, altogether 56 patients with homonymous hemianopia were recruited. The three experiments were: i) repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS, n = 8) vs. rtACS with prior cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the intact visual cortex (tDCS/rtACS, n = 8) vs. sham (n = 8); ii) rtACS (n = 9) vs. sham (n = 9); and iii) tDCS of the visual cortex (n = 7) vs. sham (n = 7). Visual functions were evaluated before and after the intervention, and after eight weeks follow-up. The primary outcome was change in visual field assessed by high-resolution and standard perimetries. The individual modalities were compared within each experimental arm. RESULTS: Primary outcomes in Experiments 1 and 2 were negative. Only significant between-group change was observed in Experiment 3, where tDCS increased visual field of the contralesional eye compared to sham. tDCS/rtACS improved dynamic vision, reading, and visual field of the contralesional eye, but was not superior to other groups. rtACS alone increased foveal sensitivity, but was otherwise ineffective. All trial-related procedures were tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory trial showed safety but no main effect of NIBS on vision restoration after stroke. However, tDCS and combined tDCS/rtACS induced improvements in visually guided performance that need to be confirmed in larger-sample trials. NCT01418820 (clinicaltrials.gov)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84616722021-10-08 Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) Räty, Silja Borrmann, Carolin Granata, Giuseppe Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth Schoenfeld, Ariel Sailer, Michael Silvennoinen, Katri Holopainen, Juha De Rossi, Francesca Antal, Andrea Rossini, Paolo M. Tatlisumak, Turgut Sabel, Bernhard A. Restor Neurol Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke. OBJECTIVE: We explored different NIBS modalities for rehabilitation of hemianopia after chronic stroke. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed trial, altogether 56 patients with homonymous hemianopia were recruited. The three experiments were: i) repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS, n = 8) vs. rtACS with prior cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the intact visual cortex (tDCS/rtACS, n = 8) vs. sham (n = 8); ii) rtACS (n = 9) vs. sham (n = 9); and iii) tDCS of the visual cortex (n = 7) vs. sham (n = 7). Visual functions were evaluated before and after the intervention, and after eight weeks follow-up. The primary outcome was change in visual field assessed by high-resolution and standard perimetries. The individual modalities were compared within each experimental arm. RESULTS: Primary outcomes in Experiments 1 and 2 were negative. Only significant between-group change was observed in Experiment 3, where tDCS increased visual field of the contralesional eye compared to sham. tDCS/rtACS improved dynamic vision, reading, and visual field of the contralesional eye, but was not superior to other groups. rtACS alone increased foveal sensitivity, but was otherwise ineffective. All trial-related procedures were tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory trial showed safety but no main effect of NIBS on vision restoration after stroke. However, tDCS and combined tDCS/rtACS induced improvements in visually guided performance that need to be confirmed in larger-sample trials. NCT01418820 (clinicaltrials.gov) IOS Press 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8461672/ /pubmed/34219679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211198 Text en © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Räty, Silja
Borrmann, Carolin
Granata, Giuseppe
Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth
Schoenfeld, Ariel
Sailer, Michael
Silvennoinen, Katri
Holopainen, Juha
De Rossi, Francesca
Antal, Andrea
Rossini, Paolo M.
Tatlisumak, Turgut
Sabel, Bernhard A.
Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
title Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
title_full Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
title_fullStr Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
title_short Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
title_sort non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: an exploratory randomized trial (revis)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219679
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211198
work_keys_str_mv AT ratysilja noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT borrmanncarolin noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT granatagiuseppe noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT cardenasmoraleslizbeth noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT schoenfeldariel noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT sailermichael noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT silvennoinenkatri noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT holopainenjuha noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT derossifrancesca noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT antalandrea noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT rossinipaolom noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT tatlisumakturgut noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis
AT sabelbernharda noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis