Cargando…
Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
BACKGROUND: Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke. OBJECTIVE: We explored differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211198 |
_version_ | 1784572038133841920 |
---|---|
author | Räty, Silja Borrmann, Carolin Granata, Giuseppe Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth Schoenfeld, Ariel Sailer, Michael Silvennoinen, Katri Holopainen, Juha De Rossi, Francesca Antal, Andrea Rossini, Paolo M. Tatlisumak, Turgut Sabel, Bernhard A. |
author_facet | Räty, Silja Borrmann, Carolin Granata, Giuseppe Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth Schoenfeld, Ariel Sailer, Michael Silvennoinen, Katri Holopainen, Juha De Rossi, Francesca Antal, Andrea Rossini, Paolo M. Tatlisumak, Turgut Sabel, Bernhard A. |
author_sort | Räty, Silja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke. OBJECTIVE: We explored different NIBS modalities for rehabilitation of hemianopia after chronic stroke. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed trial, altogether 56 patients with homonymous hemianopia were recruited. The three experiments were: i) repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS, n = 8) vs. rtACS with prior cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the intact visual cortex (tDCS/rtACS, n = 8) vs. sham (n = 8); ii) rtACS (n = 9) vs. sham (n = 9); and iii) tDCS of the visual cortex (n = 7) vs. sham (n = 7). Visual functions were evaluated before and after the intervention, and after eight weeks follow-up. The primary outcome was change in visual field assessed by high-resolution and standard perimetries. The individual modalities were compared within each experimental arm. RESULTS: Primary outcomes in Experiments 1 and 2 were negative. Only significant between-group change was observed in Experiment 3, where tDCS increased visual field of the contralesional eye compared to sham. tDCS/rtACS improved dynamic vision, reading, and visual field of the contralesional eye, but was not superior to other groups. rtACS alone increased foveal sensitivity, but was otherwise ineffective. All trial-related procedures were tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory trial showed safety but no main effect of NIBS on vision restoration after stroke. However, tDCS and combined tDCS/rtACS induced improvements in visually guided performance that need to be confirmed in larger-sample trials. NCT01418820 (clinicaltrials.gov) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8461672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84616722021-10-08 Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) Räty, Silja Borrmann, Carolin Granata, Giuseppe Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth Schoenfeld, Ariel Sailer, Michael Silvennoinen, Katri Holopainen, Juha De Rossi, Francesca Antal, Andrea Rossini, Paolo M. Tatlisumak, Turgut Sabel, Bernhard A. Restor Neurol Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke. OBJECTIVE: We explored different NIBS modalities for rehabilitation of hemianopia after chronic stroke. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed trial, altogether 56 patients with homonymous hemianopia were recruited. The three experiments were: i) repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS, n = 8) vs. rtACS with prior cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the intact visual cortex (tDCS/rtACS, n = 8) vs. sham (n = 8); ii) rtACS (n = 9) vs. sham (n = 9); and iii) tDCS of the visual cortex (n = 7) vs. sham (n = 7). Visual functions were evaluated before and after the intervention, and after eight weeks follow-up. The primary outcome was change in visual field assessed by high-resolution and standard perimetries. The individual modalities were compared within each experimental arm. RESULTS: Primary outcomes in Experiments 1 and 2 were negative. Only significant between-group change was observed in Experiment 3, where tDCS increased visual field of the contralesional eye compared to sham. tDCS/rtACS improved dynamic vision, reading, and visual field of the contralesional eye, but was not superior to other groups. rtACS alone increased foveal sensitivity, but was otherwise ineffective. All trial-related procedures were tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory trial showed safety but no main effect of NIBS on vision restoration after stroke. However, tDCS and combined tDCS/rtACS induced improvements in visually guided performance that need to be confirmed in larger-sample trials. NCT01418820 (clinicaltrials.gov) IOS Press 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8461672/ /pubmed/34219679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211198 Text en © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Räty, Silja Borrmann, Carolin Granata, Giuseppe Cárdenas-Morales, Lizbeth Schoenfeld, Ariel Sailer, Michael Silvennoinen, Katri Holopainen, Juha De Rossi, Francesca Antal, Andrea Rossini, Paolo M. Tatlisumak, Turgut Sabel, Bernhard A. Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) |
title | Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) |
title_full | Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) |
title_short | Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS) |
title_sort | non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: an exploratory randomized trial (revis) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-211198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ratysilja noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT borrmanncarolin noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT granatagiuseppe noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT cardenasmoraleslizbeth noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT schoenfeldariel noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT sailermichael noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT silvennoinenkatri noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT holopainenjuha noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT derossifrancesca noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT antalandrea noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT rossinipaolom noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT tatlisumakturgut noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis AT sabelbernharda noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationforvisionrestorationafterstrokeanexploratoryrandomizedtrialrevis |