Cargando…

Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial

OBJECTIVES: Response rates to physician surveys are typically low. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a prenotification letter on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians. DESIGN: This was a substudy of a national, cross-sectional postal survey sent to eme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hickey, Michael, McIntyre, Lauralyn, Taljaard, Monica, Abdulaziz, Kasim, Yadav, Krishan, Hickey, Carly, Perry, Jeffrey J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052843
_version_ 1784572043100946432
author Hickey, Michael
McIntyre, Lauralyn
Taljaard, Monica
Abdulaziz, Kasim
Yadav, Krishan
Hickey, Carly
Perry, Jeffrey J
author_facet Hickey, Michael
McIntyre, Lauralyn
Taljaard, Monica
Abdulaziz, Kasim
Yadav, Krishan
Hickey, Carly
Perry, Jeffrey J
author_sort Hickey, Michael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Response rates to physician surveys are typically low. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a prenotification letter on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians. DESIGN: This was a substudy of a national, cross-sectional postal survey sent to emergency physicians in Canada. We randomised participants to either receive a postal prenotification letter prior to the survey, or to no prenotification letter. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 500 emergency physicians in Canada. Participants were selected from the Canadian Medical Directory, a national medical directory which lists more than 99% of practising physicians in Canada. INTERVENTIONS: Using computer-generated randomisation, physicians were randomised in a concealed fashion to receive a prenotification letter approximately 1 week prior to the survey, or to not receive a prenotification letter. All physicians received an unconditional incentive of a $3 coffee card with the survey instrument. In both groups, non-respondents were sent reminder surveys approximately every 14 days and a special contact using Xpresspost during the final contact attempt. OUTCOME: The primary outcome was the survey response rate. RESULTS: 201 of 447 eligible physicians returned the survey (45.0%). Of 231 eligible physicians contacted in the prenotification group, 80 (34.6%) returned the survey and among 237 eligible physicians contacted in the no-prenotification group, 121 (51.1%) returned the survey (absolute difference in proportions 16.5%, 95% CI 2.5 to 30.5, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of a prenotification letter resulted in a lower response rate in this postal survey of emergency physicians. Given the added costs, time and effort required to send a prenotification letter, this study suggests that it may be more effective to omit the prenotification letter in physician postal surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84616902021-10-08 Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial Hickey, Michael McIntyre, Lauralyn Taljaard, Monica Abdulaziz, Kasim Yadav, Krishan Hickey, Carly Perry, Jeffrey J BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: Response rates to physician surveys are typically low. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a prenotification letter on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians. DESIGN: This was a substudy of a national, cross-sectional postal survey sent to emergency physicians in Canada. We randomised participants to either receive a postal prenotification letter prior to the survey, or to no prenotification letter. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 500 emergency physicians in Canada. Participants were selected from the Canadian Medical Directory, a national medical directory which lists more than 99% of practising physicians in Canada. INTERVENTIONS: Using computer-generated randomisation, physicians were randomised in a concealed fashion to receive a prenotification letter approximately 1 week prior to the survey, or to not receive a prenotification letter. All physicians received an unconditional incentive of a $3 coffee card with the survey instrument. In both groups, non-respondents were sent reminder surveys approximately every 14 days and a special contact using Xpresspost during the final contact attempt. OUTCOME: The primary outcome was the survey response rate. RESULTS: 201 of 447 eligible physicians returned the survey (45.0%). Of 231 eligible physicians contacted in the prenotification group, 80 (34.6%) returned the survey and among 237 eligible physicians contacted in the no-prenotification group, 121 (51.1%) returned the survey (absolute difference in proportions 16.5%, 95% CI 2.5 to 30.5, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of a prenotification letter resulted in a lower response rate in this postal survey of emergency physicians. Given the added costs, time and effort required to send a prenotification letter, this study suggests that it may be more effective to omit the prenotification letter in physician postal surveys. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8461690/ /pubmed/34556517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052843 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Hickey, Michael
McIntyre, Lauralyn
Taljaard, Monica
Abdulaziz, Kasim
Yadav, Krishan
Hickey, Carly
Perry, Jeffrey J
Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial
title Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial
title_full Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial
title_fullStr Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial
title_short Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial
title_sort effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052843
work_keys_str_mv AT hickeymichael effectofprenotificationontheresponserateofapostalsurveyofemergencyphysiciansarandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrial
AT mcintyrelauralyn effectofprenotificationontheresponserateofapostalsurveyofemergencyphysiciansarandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrial
AT taljaardmonica effectofprenotificationontheresponserateofapostalsurveyofemergencyphysiciansarandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrial
AT abdulazizkasim effectofprenotificationontheresponserateofapostalsurveyofemergencyphysiciansarandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrial
AT yadavkrishan effectofprenotificationontheresponserateofapostalsurveyofemergencyphysiciansarandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrial
AT hickeycarly effectofprenotificationontheresponserateofapostalsurveyofemergencyphysiciansarandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrial
AT perryjeffreyj effectofprenotificationontheresponserateofapostalsurveyofemergencyphysiciansarandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrial