Cargando…

Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between preparations and real-life experiences among prehospital major incident commanders. DESIGN: An explorative, qualitative design was used. SETTING: Prehospital major incidents in Sweden. Data were collected between December 2019 and August 2020. PARTICIPA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hugelius, Karin, Edelbring, Samuel, Blomberg, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048792
_version_ 1784572057374162944
author Hugelius, Karin
Edelbring, Samuel
Blomberg, Karin
author_facet Hugelius, Karin
Edelbring, Samuel
Blomberg, Karin
author_sort Hugelius, Karin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between preparations and real-life experiences among prehospital major incident commanders. DESIGN: An explorative, qualitative design was used. SETTING: Prehospital major incidents in Sweden. Data were collected between December 2019 and August 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Prehospital major incident commanders (n=15) with real-life experiences from major events, such as fires, bus accidents, a bridge collapse and terrorist attacks, were included. All but one had participated in 2-day training focusing on the prehospital management of major incidents. In addition, about half of the participants had participated in simulation exercises, academic courses and other training in the management of major incidents. METHODS: Data from two-session individual interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The conformity between real-life major incidents and preparations was good regarding prehospital major incident commanders’ knowledge of the operational procedures applied in major incidents. However, the preparations did not allow for the complexities and endurance strategies required in real-life incidents. Personal preparations, such as mental preparedness or stress management, were not sufficiently covered in the preparations. To some extent, professional experience (such as training) could compensate for the lack of formal preparations. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified perceived gaps between preparations and real-life experiences of being a prehospital major incident commander. To minimise the gaps between demands and expectations on perceived control and to better prepare individuals for being prehospital major incident commanders, the training and other preparations should reflect complexities of real-life incidents. Preparations should develop both technical skills required, such as principles and methodology used, and personal preparedness. Personal preparations should include improving one’s mental preparedness, self-knowledge and professional self-confidence required to successfully act as a prehospital incident commander. Since little is known about what pedagogical methods that should be used to enhance this, further research is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84617472021-10-08 Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study Hugelius, Karin Edelbring, Samuel Blomberg, Karin BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between preparations and real-life experiences among prehospital major incident commanders. DESIGN: An explorative, qualitative design was used. SETTING: Prehospital major incidents in Sweden. Data were collected between December 2019 and August 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Prehospital major incident commanders (n=15) with real-life experiences from major events, such as fires, bus accidents, a bridge collapse and terrorist attacks, were included. All but one had participated in 2-day training focusing on the prehospital management of major incidents. In addition, about half of the participants had participated in simulation exercises, academic courses and other training in the management of major incidents. METHODS: Data from two-session individual interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The conformity between real-life major incidents and preparations was good regarding prehospital major incident commanders’ knowledge of the operational procedures applied in major incidents. However, the preparations did not allow for the complexities and endurance strategies required in real-life incidents. Personal preparations, such as mental preparedness or stress management, were not sufficiently covered in the preparations. To some extent, professional experience (such as training) could compensate for the lack of formal preparations. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified perceived gaps between preparations and real-life experiences of being a prehospital major incident commander. To minimise the gaps between demands and expectations on perceived control and to better prepare individuals for being prehospital major incident commanders, the training and other preparations should reflect complexities of real-life incidents. Preparations should develop both technical skills required, such as principles and methodology used, and personal preparedness. Personal preparations should include improving one’s mental preparedness, self-knowledge and professional self-confidence required to successfully act as a prehospital incident commander. Since little is known about what pedagogical methods that should be used to enhance this, further research is needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8461747/ /pubmed/34556511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048792 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Hugelius, Karin
Edelbring, Samuel
Blomberg, Karin
Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study
title Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study
title_full Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study
title_fullStr Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study
title_short Prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? A qualitative study
title_sort prehospital major incident management: how do training and real-life situations relate? a qualitative study
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048792
work_keys_str_mv AT hugeliuskarin prehospitalmajorincidentmanagementhowdotrainingandreallifesituationsrelateaqualitativestudy
AT edelbringsamuel prehospitalmajorincidentmanagementhowdotrainingandreallifesituationsrelateaqualitativestudy
AT blombergkarin prehospitalmajorincidentmanagementhowdotrainingandreallifesituationsrelateaqualitativestudy