Cargando…

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has a still conflicting efficacy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and might be a minimally invasive and safe treatment alternative. The potential benefit of only plasma (non-enriched) has never been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intra-artic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dório, Murillo, Pereira, Rosa Maria Rodrigues, Luz, Alexandre Galeno Branco, Deveza, Leticia Alle, de Oliveira, Ricardo Manoel, Fuller, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34560869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04706-7
_version_ 1784572072894136320
author Dório, Murillo
Pereira, Rosa Maria Rodrigues
Luz, Alexandre Galeno Branco
Deveza, Leticia Alle
de Oliveira, Ricardo Manoel
Fuller, Ricardo
author_facet Dório, Murillo
Pereira, Rosa Maria Rodrigues
Luz, Alexandre Galeno Branco
Deveza, Leticia Alle
de Oliveira, Ricardo Manoel
Fuller, Ricardo
author_sort Dório, Murillo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has a still conflicting efficacy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and might be a minimally invasive and safe treatment alternative. The potential benefit of only plasma (non-enriched) has never been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and plasma to improve pain and function in participants with KOA over 24 weeks. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 3 groups (n = 62): PRP (n = 20), plasma (n = 21) and saline (n = 21). Two ultrasound-guided knee injections were performed with a 2-week interval. The primary outcome was visual analog scale 0-10 cm (VAS) for overall pain at week 24, with intermediate assessments at weeks 6 and 12. Main secondary outcomes were: KOOS, OMERACT-OARSI criteria and TUGT. RESULTS: At baseline, 92% of participants were female, with a mean age of 65 years, mean BMI of 28.0 Kg/m(2)and mean VAS pain of 6.2 cm. Change in pain from baseline at week 24 were -2.9 (SD 2.5), -2.4 (SD 2.5) and -3.5 cm (SD 3.3) for PRP, plasma and saline, respectively (p intergroup = 0.499). There were no differences between the three groups at weeks 6 and 12. Similarly, there were no differences between groups regarding secondary outcomes. The PRP group showed higher frequency of adverse events (65% versus 24% and 33% for plasma and saline, respectively, p = 0.02), mostly mild transitory increase in pain. CONCLUSIONS: PRP and plasma were not superior to placebo for pain and function improvement in KOA over 24 weeks. The PRP group had a higher frequency of mild transitory increase in pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03138317, 03/05/2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04706-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84618502021-09-24 Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial Dório, Murillo Pereira, Rosa Maria Rodrigues Luz, Alexandre Galeno Branco Deveza, Leticia Alle de Oliveira, Ricardo Manoel Fuller, Ricardo BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has a still conflicting efficacy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and might be a minimally invasive and safe treatment alternative. The potential benefit of only plasma (non-enriched) has never been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and plasma to improve pain and function in participants with KOA over 24 weeks. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 3 groups (n = 62): PRP (n = 20), plasma (n = 21) and saline (n = 21). Two ultrasound-guided knee injections were performed with a 2-week interval. The primary outcome was visual analog scale 0-10 cm (VAS) for overall pain at week 24, with intermediate assessments at weeks 6 and 12. Main secondary outcomes were: KOOS, OMERACT-OARSI criteria and TUGT. RESULTS: At baseline, 92% of participants were female, with a mean age of 65 years, mean BMI of 28.0 Kg/m(2)and mean VAS pain of 6.2 cm. Change in pain from baseline at week 24 were -2.9 (SD 2.5), -2.4 (SD 2.5) and -3.5 cm (SD 3.3) for PRP, plasma and saline, respectively (p intergroup = 0.499). There were no differences between the three groups at weeks 6 and 12. Similarly, there were no differences between groups regarding secondary outcomes. The PRP group showed higher frequency of adverse events (65% versus 24% and 33% for plasma and saline, respectively, p = 0.02), mostly mild transitory increase in pain. CONCLUSIONS: PRP and plasma were not superior to placebo for pain and function improvement in KOA over 24 weeks. The PRP group had a higher frequency of mild transitory increase in pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03138317, 03/05/2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04706-7. BioMed Central 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8461850/ /pubmed/34560869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04706-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dório, Murillo
Pereira, Rosa Maria Rodrigues
Luz, Alexandre Galeno Branco
Deveza, Leticia Alle
de Oliveira, Ricardo Manoel
Fuller, Ricardo
Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
title Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
title_full Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
title_short Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
title_sort efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and plasma for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34560869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04706-7
work_keys_str_mv AT doriomurillo efficacyofplateletrichplasmaandplasmaforsymptomatictreatmentofkneeosteoarthritisadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pereirarosamariarodrigues efficacyofplateletrichplasmaandplasmaforsymptomatictreatmentofkneeosteoarthritisadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT luzalexandregalenobranco efficacyofplateletrichplasmaandplasmaforsymptomatictreatmentofkneeosteoarthritisadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT devezaleticiaalle efficacyofplateletrichplasmaandplasmaforsymptomatictreatmentofkneeosteoarthritisadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT deoliveiraricardomanoel efficacyofplateletrichplasmaandplasmaforsymptomatictreatmentofkneeosteoarthritisadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fullerricardo efficacyofplateletrichplasmaandplasmaforsymptomatictreatmentofkneeosteoarthritisadoubleblindedplacebocontrolledrandomizedclinicaltrial