Cargando…

Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study

BACKGROUND: Heuristic (i.e., evidence-based, rounded) cadences of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min have consistently corresponded with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) and vigorous (6 METs) physical activity intensity, respectively, in adults 21–60 years of age. There is no conse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Mora-Gonzalez, Jose, Ducharme, Scott W., Aguiar, Elroy J., Schuna, John M., Barreira, Tiago V., Moore, Christopher C., Chase, Colleen J., Gould, Zachary R., Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A., Chipkin, Stuart R., Staudenmayer, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4
_version_ 1784572102345490432
author Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Mora-Gonzalez, Jose
Ducharme, Scott W.
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Schuna, John M.
Barreira, Tiago V.
Moore, Christopher C.
Chase, Colleen J.
Gould, Zachary R.
Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A.
Chipkin, Stuart R.
Staudenmayer, John
author_facet Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Mora-Gonzalez, Jose
Ducharme, Scott W.
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Schuna, John M.
Barreira, Tiago V.
Moore, Christopher C.
Chase, Colleen J.
Gould, Zachary R.
Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A.
Chipkin, Stuart R.
Staudenmayer, John
author_sort Tudor-Locke, Catrine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heuristic (i.e., evidence-based, rounded) cadences of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min have consistently corresponded with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) and vigorous (6 METs) physical activity intensity, respectively, in adults 21–60 years of age. There is no consensus regarding similar thresholds in older adults. PURPOSE: To provide heuristic cadence thresholds for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs in 61–85-year-old adults. METHODS: Ninety-eight community-dwelling ambulatory and ostensibly healthy older adults (age = 72.6 ± 6.9 years; 49% women) walked on a treadmill for a series of 5-min bouts (beginning at 0.5 mph with 0.5 mph increments) in this laboratory-based cross-sectional study until: 1) transitioning to running, 2) reaching ≥75% of their age-predicted maximum heart rate, or 3) reporting a Borg rating of perceived exertion > 13. Cadence was directly observed and hand-tallied. Intensity (oxygen uptake [VO(2)] mL/kg/min) was assessed with indirect calorimetry and converted to METs (1 MET = 3.5 mL/kg/min). Cadence thresholds were identified via segmented mixed effects model regression and using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Final heuristic cadence thresholds represented an analytical compromise based on classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy). RESULTS: Cadences of 103.1 (95% Prediction Interval: 70.0–114.2), 116.4 (105.3–127.4), 129.6 (118.6–140.7), and 142.9 steps/min (131.8–148.4) were identified for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs, respectively, based on the segmented regression. Comparable values based on ROC analysis were 100.3 (95% Confidence Intervals: 95.7–103.1), 111.5 (106.1–112.9), 116.0 (112.4–120.2), and 128.6 steps/min (128.3–136.4). Heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs. Data to inform a threshold for ≥6 METs was limited, as only 6/98 (6.0%) participants achieved this intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous data collected from 21–40 and 41–60-year-old adults, heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 steps/min were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs, respectively, in 61–85-year-old adults. Most older adults tested did not achieve the intensity of ≥6 METs; therefore, our data do not support establishing thresholds corresponding with this intensity level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258. Registered 24 December 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8461976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84619762021-09-24 Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study Tudor-Locke, Catrine Mora-Gonzalez, Jose Ducharme, Scott W. Aguiar, Elroy J. Schuna, John M. Barreira, Tiago V. Moore, Christopher C. Chase, Colleen J. Gould, Zachary R. Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A. Chipkin, Stuart R. Staudenmayer, John Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Heuristic (i.e., evidence-based, rounded) cadences of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min have consistently corresponded with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) and vigorous (6 METs) physical activity intensity, respectively, in adults 21–60 years of age. There is no consensus regarding similar thresholds in older adults. PURPOSE: To provide heuristic cadence thresholds for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs in 61–85-year-old adults. METHODS: Ninety-eight community-dwelling ambulatory and ostensibly healthy older adults (age = 72.6 ± 6.9 years; 49% women) walked on a treadmill for a series of 5-min bouts (beginning at 0.5 mph with 0.5 mph increments) in this laboratory-based cross-sectional study until: 1) transitioning to running, 2) reaching ≥75% of their age-predicted maximum heart rate, or 3) reporting a Borg rating of perceived exertion > 13. Cadence was directly observed and hand-tallied. Intensity (oxygen uptake [VO(2)] mL/kg/min) was assessed with indirect calorimetry and converted to METs (1 MET = 3.5 mL/kg/min). Cadence thresholds were identified via segmented mixed effects model regression and using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Final heuristic cadence thresholds represented an analytical compromise based on classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy). RESULTS: Cadences of 103.1 (95% Prediction Interval: 70.0–114.2), 116.4 (105.3–127.4), 129.6 (118.6–140.7), and 142.9 steps/min (131.8–148.4) were identified for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs, respectively, based on the segmented regression. Comparable values based on ROC analysis were 100.3 (95% Confidence Intervals: 95.7–103.1), 111.5 (106.1–112.9), 116.0 (112.4–120.2), and 128.6 steps/min (128.3–136.4). Heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs. Data to inform a threshold for ≥6 METs was limited, as only 6/98 (6.0%) participants achieved this intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous data collected from 21–40 and 41–60-year-old adults, heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 steps/min were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs, respectively, in 61–85-year-old adults. Most older adults tested did not achieve the intensity of ≥6 METs; therefore, our data do not support establishing thresholds corresponding with this intensity level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258. Registered 24 December 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4. BioMed Central 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8461976/ /pubmed/34556146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Mora-Gonzalez, Jose
Ducharme, Scott W.
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Schuna, John M.
Barreira, Tiago V.
Moore, Christopher C.
Chase, Colleen J.
Gould, Zachary R.
Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A.
Chipkin, Stuart R.
Staudenmayer, John
Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_full Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_fullStr Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_full_unstemmed Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_short Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_sort walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the cadence-adults study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8461976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34556146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tudorlockecatrine walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT moragonzalezjose walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT ducharmescottw walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT aguiarelroyj walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT schunajohnm walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT barreiratiagov walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT moorechristopherc walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT chasecolleenj walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT gouldzacharyr walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT amalbertbirrielmarcosa walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT chipkinstuartr walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT staudenmayerjohn walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy