Cargando…
Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery
The pandemic in 2020 caused an abrupt change in the emission of anthropogenic aerosols and their precursors. We estimate the associated change in the aerosol radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere and the surface. To that end, we perform new simulations with the CMIP6 global climate model EC...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105866 |
_version_ | 1784572120350588928 |
---|---|
author | Fiedler, Stephanie Wyser, Klaus Rogelj, Joeri van Noije, Twan |
author_facet | Fiedler, Stephanie Wyser, Klaus Rogelj, Joeri van Noije, Twan |
author_sort | Fiedler, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The pandemic in 2020 caused an abrupt change in the emission of anthropogenic aerosols and their precursors. We estimate the associated change in the aerosol radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere and the surface. To that end, we perform new simulations with the CMIP6 global climate model EC-Earth3. The simulations use the here newly created data for the anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated effect on clouds from the simple plumes parameterization (MACv2-SP), based on revised SO(2) and NH(3) emission scenarios. Our results highlight the small impact of the pandemic on the global aerosol radiative forcing in 2020 compared to the CMIP6 scenario SSP2-4.5 of the order of +0.04 Wm(−2), which is small compared to the natural year-to-year variability in the radiation budget. Natural variability also limits the ability to detect a meaningful regional difference in the anthropogenic aerosol radiative effects. We identify the best chances to find a significant change in radiation at the surface during cloud-free conditions for regions that were strongly polluted in the past years. The post-pandemic recovery scenarios indicate a spread in the aerosol forcing of −0.68 to −0.38 Wm(−2) for 2050 relative to the pre-industrial, which translates to a difference of +0.05 to −0.25 Wm(−2) compared to the 2050 baseline from SSP2-4.5. This spread falls within the present-day uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing and the CMIP6 spread in aerosol forcing at the end of the 21st century. We release the new MACv2-SP data for studies on the climate response to the pandemic and the recovery scenarios. Our 2050 forcing estimates suggest that sustained aerosol emission reductions during the post-pandemic recovery cause a stronger climate response than in 2020, i.e., there is a delayed influence of the pandemic on climate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8462062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84620622021-09-27 Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery Fiedler, Stephanie Wyser, Klaus Rogelj, Joeri van Noije, Twan Atmos Res Article The pandemic in 2020 caused an abrupt change in the emission of anthropogenic aerosols and their precursors. We estimate the associated change in the aerosol radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere and the surface. To that end, we perform new simulations with the CMIP6 global climate model EC-Earth3. The simulations use the here newly created data for the anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated effect on clouds from the simple plumes parameterization (MACv2-SP), based on revised SO(2) and NH(3) emission scenarios. Our results highlight the small impact of the pandemic on the global aerosol radiative forcing in 2020 compared to the CMIP6 scenario SSP2-4.5 of the order of +0.04 Wm(−2), which is small compared to the natural year-to-year variability in the radiation budget. Natural variability also limits the ability to detect a meaningful regional difference in the anthropogenic aerosol radiative effects. We identify the best chances to find a significant change in radiation at the surface during cloud-free conditions for regions that were strongly polluted in the past years. The post-pandemic recovery scenarios indicate a spread in the aerosol forcing of −0.68 to −0.38 Wm(−2) for 2050 relative to the pre-industrial, which translates to a difference of +0.05 to −0.25 Wm(−2) compared to the 2050 baseline from SSP2-4.5. This spread falls within the present-day uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing and the CMIP6 spread in aerosol forcing at the end of the 21st century. We release the new MACv2-SP data for studies on the climate response to the pandemic and the recovery scenarios. Our 2050 forcing estimates suggest that sustained aerosol emission reductions during the post-pandemic recovery cause a stronger climate response than in 2020, i.e., there is a delayed influence of the pandemic on climate. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021-12-15 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8462062/ /pubmed/34602689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105866 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Fiedler, Stephanie Wyser, Klaus Rogelj, Joeri van Noije, Twan Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery |
title | Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery |
title_full | Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery |
title_fullStr | Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery |
title_short | Radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the future recovery |
title_sort | radiative effects of reduced aerosol emissions during the covid-19 pandemic and the future recovery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fiedlerstephanie radiativeeffectsofreducedaerosolemissionsduringthecovid19pandemicandthefuturerecovery AT wyserklaus radiativeeffectsofreducedaerosolemissionsduringthecovid19pandemicandthefuturerecovery AT rogeljjoeri radiativeeffectsofreducedaerosolemissionsduringthecovid19pandemicandthefuturerecovery AT vannoijetwan radiativeeffectsofreducedaerosolemissionsduringthecovid19pandemicandthefuturerecovery |