Cargando…

Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Various sites are used for specimen extraction in oncological minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The objective is to determine if the choice of extraction site modulates the incidence of incisional hernia (IH). METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic review will be performed in accordance to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Jeremy, Simillis, Constantinos, Joshi, Heman, Xanthis, Athanasios, Ashcroft, James, Buchs, Nicolas, Ris, Frédéric, Davies, R. Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJS Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616959
http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.164
_version_ 1784572218583285760
author Meyer, Jeremy
Simillis, Constantinos
Joshi, Heman
Xanthis, Athanasios
Ashcroft, James
Buchs, Nicolas
Ris, Frédéric
Davies, R. Justin
author_facet Meyer, Jeremy
Simillis, Constantinos
Joshi, Heman
Xanthis, Athanasios
Ashcroft, James
Buchs, Nicolas
Ris, Frédéric
Davies, R. Justin
author_sort Meyer, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various sites are used for specimen extraction in oncological minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The objective is to determine if the choice of extraction site modulates the incidence of incisional hernia (IH). METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic review will be performed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL will be searched to look for original studies reporting the incidence of IH after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Studies will be excluded from the analysis if: 1) they do not report original data, 2) the outcome of interest (incidence of incisional hernia) is not clearly reported and does not allow to extrapolate and/or calculate the required data for network meta-analysis, 3) they include pediatric patients, 4) they include a patients’ population with a conversion rate to laparotomy >10%, 5) they do not compare at least two different extraction sites for the operative specimen, 6) they report patients who underwent pure (and not hybrid) natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Network meta-analysis will be performed to determine the incidence of IH per extraction site. DISCUSSION: By determining which specimen extraction site leads to reduced rate of IH, this systematic review and network meta-analysis will help colorectal surgeons to choose their extraction site and reduce the morbidity and costs associated with IH. REGISTRATION: The systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with number CRD42021272226. HIGHLIGHTS: Various sites are used for specimen extraction in oncological minimally invasive colorectal surgery, and the choice of the site may probably modulate the incidence of incisional hernia. The present protocol aims to design a systematic review which will identify original studies comparing two extraction sites during minimally invasive colorectal surgery in terms of incidence of incisional hernia. Network meta-analysis will be performed to determine the incidence of IH per extraction site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8462477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher IJS Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84624772021-10-05 Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Meyer, Jeremy Simillis, Constantinos Joshi, Heman Xanthis, Athanasios Ashcroft, James Buchs, Nicolas Ris, Frédéric Davies, R. Justin Int J Surg Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Various sites are used for specimen extraction in oncological minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The objective is to determine if the choice of extraction site modulates the incidence of incisional hernia (IH). METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic review will be performed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL will be searched to look for original studies reporting the incidence of IH after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Studies will be excluded from the analysis if: 1) they do not report original data, 2) the outcome of interest (incidence of incisional hernia) is not clearly reported and does not allow to extrapolate and/or calculate the required data for network meta-analysis, 3) they include pediatric patients, 4) they include a patients’ population with a conversion rate to laparotomy >10%, 5) they do not compare at least two different extraction sites for the operative specimen, 6) they report patients who underwent pure (and not hybrid) natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Network meta-analysis will be performed to determine the incidence of IH per extraction site. DISCUSSION: By determining which specimen extraction site leads to reduced rate of IH, this systematic review and network meta-analysis will help colorectal surgeons to choose their extraction site and reduce the morbidity and costs associated with IH. REGISTRATION: The systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with number CRD42021272226. HIGHLIGHTS: Various sites are used for specimen extraction in oncological minimally invasive colorectal surgery, and the choice of the site may probably modulate the incidence of incisional hernia. The present protocol aims to design a systematic review which will identify original studies comparing two extraction sites during minimally invasive colorectal surgery in terms of incidence of incisional hernia. Network meta-analysis will be performed to determine the incidence of IH per extraction site. IJS Publishing Group 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8462477/ /pubmed/34616959 http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.164 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Protocol
Meyer, Jeremy
Simillis, Constantinos
Joshi, Heman
Xanthis, Athanasios
Ashcroft, James
Buchs, Nicolas
Ris, Frédéric
Davies, R. Justin
Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort does the choice of extraction site during minimally invasive colorectal surgery change the incidence of incisional hernia? protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616959
http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.164
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerjeremy doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT simillisconstantinos doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT joshiheman doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xanthisathanasios doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ashcroftjames doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT buchsnicolas doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT risfrederic doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT daviesrjustin doesthechoiceofextractionsiteduringminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgerychangetheincidenceofincisionalherniaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis