Cargando…

Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery

To compare the performance of margin assessment of specimen mammography (SM) in patients with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) on mobile devices and 5-megapixel (5M) thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) monitors based on the safety margin for pathologic results. This retrospective st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Bo La, Jang, Mijung, Ahn, Hye Shin, Kim, Mi Young, Kim, Bohyoung, Kim, Sun Mi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027243
_version_ 1784572226094235648
author Yun, Bo La
Jang, Mijung
Ahn, Hye Shin
Kim, Mi Young
Kim, Bohyoung
Kim, Sun Mi
author_facet Yun, Bo La
Jang, Mijung
Ahn, Hye Shin
Kim, Mi Young
Kim, Bohyoung
Kim, Sun Mi
author_sort Yun, Bo La
collection PubMed
description To compare the performance of margin assessment of specimen mammography (SM) in patients with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) on mobile devices and 5-megapixel (5M) thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) monitors based on the safety margin for pathologic results. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. A total of 105 consecutive breast cancer SM samples from 104 women who underwent BCS were included in the study. The SM were independently reviewed by two radiologists using mobile devices and by two additional radiologists using 5M TFT-LCD monitor. Each reader was asked to measure the shortest distance between the lesion and the lesion margin. The interpretation time was recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver agreement were analyzed. In total, 19% (20/105) breast specimens had a positive surgical margin (<1 mm). The mean absolute difference from the pathologic margin was 0.60 ± 0.57 cm and 0.54 ± 0.47 cm using the 5 M TFT-LCD monitor and the mobile device, respectively (without any statistical significance, P = .273). The mean interpretation time was 49.5 and 47.6 s for the 5M TFT-LCD monitor and the mobile device, respectively (P = .012). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 74% for 5M TFT-LCD monitor, and 60% and 69% for the mobile device (P = 1.00 and P = .190, respectively). The kappa coefficient indicated moderate agreement for both the displays. The diagnostic performance for margin assessment of SM in BCS patients on mobile devices and 5M TFT-LCD monitors are showed not statistically difference. The findings of the study provide evidence of the benefit of the mobile device for SM interpretation in patients who underwent BCS. However, a large sample size study is warranted before using a mobile device for margin evaluation on SM. The mobile device showed comparable diagnostic performance with 5M TFT-LCD monitor in the evaluation of SM margin in patients with BCS and could be used as a display tool for immediate assessment when a dedicated LCD monitor is unavailable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8462545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84625452021-09-27 Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery Yun, Bo La Jang, Mijung Ahn, Hye Shin Kim, Mi Young Kim, Bohyoung Kim, Sun Mi Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 To compare the performance of margin assessment of specimen mammography (SM) in patients with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) on mobile devices and 5-megapixel (5M) thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) monitors based on the safety margin for pathologic results. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. A total of 105 consecutive breast cancer SM samples from 104 women who underwent BCS were included in the study. The SM were independently reviewed by two radiologists using mobile devices and by two additional radiologists using 5M TFT-LCD monitor. Each reader was asked to measure the shortest distance between the lesion and the lesion margin. The interpretation time was recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver agreement were analyzed. In total, 19% (20/105) breast specimens had a positive surgical margin (<1 mm). The mean absolute difference from the pathologic margin was 0.60 ± 0.57 cm and 0.54 ± 0.47 cm using the 5 M TFT-LCD monitor and the mobile device, respectively (without any statistical significance, P = .273). The mean interpretation time was 49.5 and 47.6 s for the 5M TFT-LCD monitor and the mobile device, respectively (P = .012). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 74% for 5M TFT-LCD monitor, and 60% and 69% for the mobile device (P = 1.00 and P = .190, respectively). The kappa coefficient indicated moderate agreement for both the displays. The diagnostic performance for margin assessment of SM in BCS patients on mobile devices and 5M TFT-LCD monitors are showed not statistically difference. The findings of the study provide evidence of the benefit of the mobile device for SM interpretation in patients who underwent BCS. However, a large sample size study is warranted before using a mobile device for margin evaluation on SM. The mobile device showed comparable diagnostic performance with 5M TFT-LCD monitor in the evaluation of SM margin in patients with BCS and could be used as a display tool for immediate assessment when a dedicated LCD monitor is unavailable. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8462545/ /pubmed/34559124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027243 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 6800
Yun, Bo La
Jang, Mijung
Ahn, Hye Shin
Kim, Mi Young
Kim, Bohyoung
Kim, Sun Mi
Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery
title Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery
title_full Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery
title_fullStr Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery
title_full_unstemmed Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery
title_short Using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery
title_sort using a mobile device for margin assessment of specimen mammography in breast-conserving surgery
topic 6800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027243
work_keys_str_mv AT yunbola usingamobiledeviceformarginassessmentofspecimenmammographyinbreastconservingsurgery
AT jangmijung usingamobiledeviceformarginassessmentofspecimenmammographyinbreastconservingsurgery
AT ahnhyeshin usingamobiledeviceformarginassessmentofspecimenmammographyinbreastconservingsurgery
AT kimmiyoung usingamobiledeviceformarginassessmentofspecimenmammographyinbreastconservingsurgery
AT kimbohyoung usingamobiledeviceformarginassessmentofspecimenmammographyinbreastconservingsurgery
AT kimsunmi usingamobiledeviceformarginassessmentofspecimenmammographyinbreastconservingsurgery