Cargando…

Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ya, Jin, Yunfeng, Lu, Yuemei, Zhong, Xiaorong, Lu, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027148
_version_ 1784572228692606976
author Liu, Ya
Jin, Yunfeng
Lu, Yuemei
Zhong, Xiaorong
Lu, Hong
author_facet Liu, Ya
Jin, Yunfeng
Lu, Yuemei
Zhong, Xiaorong
Lu, Hong
author_sort Liu, Ya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adopted in conventional open surgery. Recent developments in laparoscopic surgery (LPS) has made it more effective. The present study aims to compare the outcomes between LPS and a conventional open surgical procedure to treat stage II endometrial carcinoma patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China National of Knowledge Infrastructure to collect LPS and conventional open surgery in treating stage II endometrial carcinoma. The search will consider all articles published since the inception of the databases till July 2021. A pair of scholars will perform independent screening of the literature and extracted data to evaluate the bias risk in the selected studies. Afterwards, RevMan5.3 software will be used to conduct a meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This study will conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of LPS and conventional open surgery in the treatment of stage II endometrial carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8462562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84625622021-09-27 Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Ya Jin, Yunfeng Lu, Yuemei Zhong, Xiaorong Lu, Hong Medicine (Baltimore) 4200 BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adopted in conventional open surgery. Recent developments in laparoscopic surgery (LPS) has made it more effective. The present study aims to compare the outcomes between LPS and a conventional open surgical procedure to treat stage II endometrial carcinoma patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China National of Knowledge Infrastructure to collect LPS and conventional open surgery in treating stage II endometrial carcinoma. The search will consider all articles published since the inception of the databases till July 2021. A pair of scholars will perform independent screening of the literature and extracted data to evaluate the bias risk in the selected studies. Afterwards, RevMan5.3 software will be used to conduct a meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This study will conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of LPS and conventional open surgery in the treatment of stage II endometrial carcinoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8462562/ /pubmed/34559103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027148 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4200
Liu, Ya
Jin, Yunfeng
Lu, Yuemei
Zhong, Xiaorong
Lu, Hong
Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage ii endometrial carcinoma: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 4200
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027148
work_keys_str_mv AT liuya comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryintreatingpatientswithstageiiendometrialcarcinomaaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinyunfeng comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryintreatingpatientswithstageiiendometrialcarcinomaaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luyuemei comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryintreatingpatientswithstageiiendometrialcarcinomaaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhongxiaorong comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryintreatingpatientswithstageiiendometrialcarcinomaaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luhong comparisonoftheoutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryintreatingpatientswithstageiiendometrialcarcinomaaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis