Cargando…
Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
This study compares the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. The clinical data of 150 patients with upper ureteral calculi who underwent RPUL and 136 patients who underwent URL between January 2014 an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027328 |
_version_ | 1784572233664954368 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Sheng-Lin Wu, Hao Su, Quan-Xin Zhang, Zi-Yi Zhang, Ze Lu, Chao Zhang, Li-Feng Zuo, Li |
author_facet | Gao, Sheng-Lin Wu, Hao Su, Quan-Xin Zhang, Zi-Yi Zhang, Ze Lu, Chao Zhang, Li-Feng Zuo, Li |
author_sort | Gao, Sheng-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compares the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. The clinical data of 150 patients with upper ureteral calculi who underwent RPUL and 136 patients who underwent URL between January 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, operation success rate, stone clearance rate, and surgical complications were evaluated between the two groups. For the RPUL and URL groups, respectively, the average operation time was 74.5 ± 24.6 minutes and 54.5 ± 13.2 minutes; the postoperative hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days and 3.2 ± 1.2 days; the operation success rate was 96.0% (144/150) and 85.3% (116/136); the incidence rate of complications was 3.5% (5/144) and 17.5% (18/103); and the stone clearance rate was 100% (144/144) and 88.8% (103/116), which were all statistically significant (P < .05). Both RPUL and URL had the advantages of low trauma and fast recovery rate for patients with upper ureteral calculi. However, patients who underwent RPUL showed higher success and fewer complication rate. RPUL might be a safe and effective laparoscopic method for the treatment of patients with upper ureteral calculi. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8462599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84625992021-09-27 Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi Gao, Sheng-Lin Wu, Hao Su, Quan-Xin Zhang, Zi-Yi Zhang, Ze Lu, Chao Zhang, Li-Feng Zuo, Li Medicine (Baltimore) 7300 This study compares the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. The clinical data of 150 patients with upper ureteral calculi who underwent RPUL and 136 patients who underwent URL between January 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, operation success rate, stone clearance rate, and surgical complications were evaluated between the two groups. For the RPUL and URL groups, respectively, the average operation time was 74.5 ± 24.6 minutes and 54.5 ± 13.2 minutes; the postoperative hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days and 3.2 ± 1.2 days; the operation success rate was 96.0% (144/150) and 85.3% (116/136); the incidence rate of complications was 3.5% (5/144) and 17.5% (18/103); and the stone clearance rate was 100% (144/144) and 88.8% (103/116), which were all statistically significant (P < .05). Both RPUL and URL had the advantages of low trauma and fast recovery rate for patients with upper ureteral calculi. However, patients who underwent RPUL showed higher success and fewer complication rate. RPUL might be a safe and effective laparoscopic method for the treatment of patients with upper ureteral calculi. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8462599/ /pubmed/34559152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027328 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 7300 Gao, Sheng-Lin Wu, Hao Su, Quan-Xin Zhang, Zi-Yi Zhang, Ze Lu, Chao Zhang, Li-Feng Zuo, Li Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
title | Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
title_full | Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
title_short | Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
title_sort | comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
topic | 7300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaoshenglin comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi AT wuhao comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi AT suquanxin comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi AT zhangziyi comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi AT zhangze comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi AT luchao comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi AT zhanglifeng comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi AT zuoli comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi |