Cargando…

Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi

This study compares the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. The clinical data of 150 patients with upper ureteral calculi who underwent RPUL and 136 patients who underwent URL between January 2014 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Sheng-Lin, Wu, Hao, Su, Quan-Xin, Zhang, Zi-Yi, Zhang, Ze, Lu, Chao, Zhang, Li-Feng, Zuo, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027328
_version_ 1784572233664954368
author Gao, Sheng-Lin
Wu, Hao
Su, Quan-Xin
Zhang, Zi-Yi
Zhang, Ze
Lu, Chao
Zhang, Li-Feng
Zuo, Li
author_facet Gao, Sheng-Lin
Wu, Hao
Su, Quan-Xin
Zhang, Zi-Yi
Zhang, Ze
Lu, Chao
Zhang, Li-Feng
Zuo, Li
author_sort Gao, Sheng-Lin
collection PubMed
description This study compares the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. The clinical data of 150 patients with upper ureteral calculi who underwent RPUL and 136 patients who underwent URL between January 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, operation success rate, stone clearance rate, and surgical complications were evaluated between the two groups. For the RPUL and URL groups, respectively, the average operation time was 74.5 ± 24.6 minutes and 54.5 ± 13.2 minutes; the postoperative hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days and 3.2 ± 1.2 days; the operation success rate was 96.0% (144/150) and 85.3% (116/136); the incidence rate of complications was 3.5% (5/144) and 17.5% (18/103); and the stone clearance rate was 100% (144/144) and 88.8% (103/116), which were all statistically significant (P < .05). Both RPUL and URL had the advantages of low trauma and fast recovery rate for patients with upper ureteral calculi. However, patients who underwent RPUL showed higher success and fewer complication rate. RPUL might be a safe and effective laparoscopic method for the treatment of patients with upper ureteral calculi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8462599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84625992021-09-27 Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi Gao, Sheng-Lin Wu, Hao Su, Quan-Xin Zhang, Zi-Yi Zhang, Ze Lu, Chao Zhang, Li-Feng Zuo, Li Medicine (Baltimore) 7300 This study compares the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. The clinical data of 150 patients with upper ureteral calculi who underwent RPUL and 136 patients who underwent URL between January 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, operation success rate, stone clearance rate, and surgical complications were evaluated between the two groups. For the RPUL and URL groups, respectively, the average operation time was 74.5 ± 24.6 minutes and 54.5 ± 13.2 minutes; the postoperative hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days and 3.2 ± 1.2 days; the operation success rate was 96.0% (144/150) and 85.3% (116/136); the incidence rate of complications was 3.5% (5/144) and 17.5% (18/103); and the stone clearance rate was 100% (144/144) and 88.8% (103/116), which were all statistically significant (P < .05). Both RPUL and URL had the advantages of low trauma and fast recovery rate for patients with upper ureteral calculi. However, patients who underwent RPUL showed higher success and fewer complication rate. RPUL might be a safe and effective laparoscopic method for the treatment of patients with upper ureteral calculi. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8462599/ /pubmed/34559152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027328 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7300
Gao, Sheng-Lin
Wu, Hao
Su, Quan-Xin
Zhang, Zi-Yi
Zhang, Ze
Lu, Chao
Zhang, Li-Feng
Zuo, Li
Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
title Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
title_full Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
title_short Comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
title_sort comparison of the effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
topic 7300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027328
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoshenglin comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi
AT wuhao comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi
AT suquanxin comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi
AT zhangziyi comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi
AT zhangze comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi
AT luchao comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi
AT zhanglifeng comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi
AT zuoli comparisonoftheeffectsofretroperitoneoscopicureterolithotomyandureteroscopiclithotripsyinthetreatmentofupperureteralcalculi