Cargando…

Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reinforced the importance of facial protection against droplet transmission of diseases. Healthcare workers wear personal protection equipment (PPE), including face shields and masks. Plastic face shields may have advantages over regular med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinsmore, Jessica, Brands, Susan, Perry, Steven, Lopez, Michael, Dong, Yutong, Palasz, Daniel, Tucker, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34546879
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50516
_version_ 1784572328492924928
author Dinsmore, Jessica
Brands, Susan
Perry, Steven
Lopez, Michael
Dong, Yutong
Palasz, Daniel
Tucker, Jennifer
author_facet Dinsmore, Jessica
Brands, Susan
Perry, Steven
Lopez, Michael
Dong, Yutong
Palasz, Daniel
Tucker, Jennifer
author_sort Dinsmore, Jessica
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reinforced the importance of facial protection against droplet transmission of diseases. Healthcare workers wear personal protection equipment (PPE), including face shields and masks. Plastic face shields may have advantages over regular medical masks. Although many designs of face shields exist, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the efficacy of shield designs against droplet transmissions. There is even less published evidence comparing various face shields. Due to the urgency of the pandemic and the health and safety of healthcare workers, we aimed to study the efficacy of various face shields against droplet transmission. METHODS: We simulated droplet transmission via coughing using a heavy-duty chemical spray bottle filled with fluorescein. A standard-adult sized mannequin head was used. The mannequin head wore various face shields and was positioned to face the spray bottle at either a 0°, 45°, or 90° angle. The spray bottle was positioned at and sprayed from 30 centimeters (cm), 60 cm, or 90 cm away from the head. These steps were repeated for all face shields used. Control was a mannequin that wore no PPE. A basic mask was also tested. We collected data for particle count, total area of particle distribution, average particle size, and percentage area covered by particles. We analyzed percent covered by particles using a repeated measures mixed-model regression with Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparison. RESULTS: We used least square means to estimate the percentage area covered by particles. Wearing PPE regardless of the design reduced particle transmission to the mannequin compared to the control. The LCG mask had the lowest square means of 0.06 of all face-shield designs analyzed. Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparison showed that all PPEs had a decrease in particle contamination compared to the control. LCG shield was found to have the least contamination compared to all other masks (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Results suggest the importance of wearing a protective covering against droplet transmission. The LCG shield was found to decrease facial contamination by droplets the most of any tested protective equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8463064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84630642021-10-01 Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting Dinsmore, Jessica Brands, Susan Perry, Steven Lopez, Michael Dong, Yutong Palasz, Daniel Tucker, Jennifer West J Emerg Med Endemic Infections INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reinforced the importance of facial protection against droplet transmission of diseases. Healthcare workers wear personal protection equipment (PPE), including face shields and masks. Plastic face shields may have advantages over regular medical masks. Although many designs of face shields exist, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the efficacy of shield designs against droplet transmissions. There is even less published evidence comparing various face shields. Due to the urgency of the pandemic and the health and safety of healthcare workers, we aimed to study the efficacy of various face shields against droplet transmission. METHODS: We simulated droplet transmission via coughing using a heavy-duty chemical spray bottle filled with fluorescein. A standard-adult sized mannequin head was used. The mannequin head wore various face shields and was positioned to face the spray bottle at either a 0°, 45°, or 90° angle. The spray bottle was positioned at and sprayed from 30 centimeters (cm), 60 cm, or 90 cm away from the head. These steps were repeated for all face shields used. Control was a mannequin that wore no PPE. A basic mask was also tested. We collected data for particle count, total area of particle distribution, average particle size, and percentage area covered by particles. We analyzed percent covered by particles using a repeated measures mixed-model regression with Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparison. RESULTS: We used least square means to estimate the percentage area covered by particles. Wearing PPE regardless of the design reduced particle transmission to the mannequin compared to the control. The LCG mask had the lowest square means of 0.06 of all face-shield designs analyzed. Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparison showed that all PPEs had a decrease in particle contamination compared to the control. LCG shield was found to have the least contamination compared to all other masks (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Results suggest the importance of wearing a protective covering against droplet transmission. The LCG shield was found to decrease facial contamination by droplets the most of any tested protective equipment. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021-09 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8463064/ /pubmed/34546879 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50516 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Dinsmore et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Endemic Infections
Dinsmore, Jessica
Brands, Susan
Perry, Steven
Lopez, Michael
Dong, Yutong
Palasz, Daniel
Tucker, Jennifer
Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting
title Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting
title_full Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting
title_fullStr Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting
title_short Efficacy of Various Facial Protective Equipment for Infection Control in a Healthcare Setting
title_sort efficacy of various facial protective equipment for infection control in a healthcare setting
topic Endemic Infections
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34546879
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50516
work_keys_str_mv AT dinsmorejessica efficacyofvariousfacialprotectiveequipmentforinfectioncontrolinahealthcaresetting
AT brandssusan efficacyofvariousfacialprotectiveequipmentforinfectioncontrolinahealthcaresetting
AT perrysteven efficacyofvariousfacialprotectiveequipmentforinfectioncontrolinahealthcaresetting
AT lopezmichael efficacyofvariousfacialprotectiveequipmentforinfectioncontrolinahealthcaresetting
AT dongyutong efficacyofvariousfacialprotectiveequipmentforinfectioncontrolinahealthcaresetting
AT palaszdaniel efficacyofvariousfacialprotectiveequipmentforinfectioncontrolinahealthcaresetting
AT tuckerjennifer efficacyofvariousfacialprotectiveequipmentforinfectioncontrolinahealthcaresetting