Cargando…

Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT

PURPOSE: Current imaging standard for acute mastoiditis (AM) is contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), revealing inflammation-induced bone destruction, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outperforms CT in detecting intracranial infection. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saat, R., Kurdo, G., Laulajainen-Hongisto, A., Markkola, A., Jero, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00931-0
_version_ 1784572392161411072
author Saat, R.
Kurdo, G.
Laulajainen-Hongisto, A.
Markkola, A.
Jero, J.
author_facet Saat, R.
Kurdo, G.
Laulajainen-Hongisto, A.
Markkola, A.
Jero, J.
author_sort Saat, R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Current imaging standard for acute mastoiditis (AM) is contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), revealing inflammation-induced bone destruction, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outperforms CT in detecting intracranial infection. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of MRI with CT in detecting coalescent AM and see to which extent MRI alone would suffice to diagnose or rule out this condition. METHODS: The MR images of 32 patients with AM were retrospectively analyzed. Bone destruction was evaluated from T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) and T1 Gd magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) images. Intramastoid enhancement and diffusion restriction were evaluated subjectively and intramastoid apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. The MRI findings were compared with contrast-enhanced CT findings of the same patients within 48 h of the MR scan. RESULTS: Depending on the anatomical subsite, MRI detected definite bone defects with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54–82%. Exception was the inner cortical table where sensitivity was only 14% and specificity was 76%. Sensitivity for general coalescent mastoiditis remained 100% due to multiple coexisting lesions. The absence of intense enhancement and non-restricted diffusion had a high negative predictive value for coalescent mastoiditis: an intramastoid ADC above 1.2 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s excluded coalescent mastoiditis with a negative predictive value of 92%. CONCLUSION: The MRI did not miss coalescent mastoiditis but was inferior to CT in direct estimation of bone defects. When enhancement and diffusion characteristics are also considered, MRI enables dividing patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories with respect to coalescent mastoiditis, where only the intermediate risk group is likely to benefit from additional CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8463380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84633802021-10-08 Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT Saat, R. Kurdo, G. Laulajainen-Hongisto, A. Markkola, A. Jero, J. Clin Neuroradiol Original Article PURPOSE: Current imaging standard for acute mastoiditis (AM) is contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), revealing inflammation-induced bone destruction, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outperforms CT in detecting intracranial infection. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of MRI with CT in detecting coalescent AM and see to which extent MRI alone would suffice to diagnose or rule out this condition. METHODS: The MR images of 32 patients with AM were retrospectively analyzed. Bone destruction was evaluated from T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) and T1 Gd magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) images. Intramastoid enhancement and diffusion restriction were evaluated subjectively and intramastoid apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. The MRI findings were compared with contrast-enhanced CT findings of the same patients within 48 h of the MR scan. RESULTS: Depending on the anatomical subsite, MRI detected definite bone defects with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54–82%. Exception was the inner cortical table where sensitivity was only 14% and specificity was 76%. Sensitivity for general coalescent mastoiditis remained 100% due to multiple coexisting lesions. The absence of intense enhancement and non-restricted diffusion had a high negative predictive value for coalescent mastoiditis: an intramastoid ADC above 1.2 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s excluded coalescent mastoiditis with a negative predictive value of 92%. CONCLUSION: The MRI did not miss coalescent mastoiditis but was inferior to CT in direct estimation of bone defects. When enhancement and diffusion characteristics are also considered, MRI enables dividing patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories with respect to coalescent mastoiditis, where only the intermediate risk group is likely to benefit from additional CT. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8463380/ /pubmed/32696283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00931-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Saat, R.
Kurdo, G.
Laulajainen-Hongisto, A.
Markkola, A.
Jero, J.
Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT
title Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT
title_full Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT
title_fullStr Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT
title_short Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT
title_sort detection of coalescent acute mastoiditis on mri in comparison with ct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00931-0
work_keys_str_mv AT saatr detectionofcoalescentacutemastoiditisonmriincomparisonwithct
AT kurdog detectionofcoalescentacutemastoiditisonmriincomparisonwithct
AT laulajainenhongistoa detectionofcoalescentacutemastoiditisonmriincomparisonwithct
AT markkolaa detectionofcoalescentacutemastoiditisonmriincomparisonwithct
AT jeroj detectionofcoalescentacutemastoiditisonmriincomparisonwithct