Cargando…

Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion abnormalities of the retina and optic nerve in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) using standard stroke diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). METHODS: In this case-control study, DWI scans of patients with nonarteritic CRAO were retros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danyel, L. A., Bohner, G., Connolly, F., Siebert, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32936308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00955-6
_version_ 1784572395524194304
author Danyel, L. A.
Bohner, G.
Connolly, F.
Siebert, E.
author_facet Danyel, L. A.
Bohner, G.
Connolly, F.
Siebert, E.
author_sort Danyel, L. A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion abnormalities of the retina and optic nerve in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) using standard stroke diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). METHODS: In this case-control study, DWI scans of patients with nonarteritic CRAO were retrospectively assessed for acute ischemia of the retina and optic nerve. Two neuroradiologists, blinded for patient diagnosis, randomly evaluated DWI of CRAO patients and controls (a collective of stroke and transient ischemic attack [TIA] patients) for restrictions of the retina and optic nerve. We calculated statistical quality criteria and analyzed inter-rater reliability using unweighted Kappa statistics. RESULTS: 20 CRAO patients (60,6 ± 17 years) and 20 controls (60,7 ± 17 years) were included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for retinal DWI restrictions were 75%/80%/79%/76% (reader 1) and 75%/100%/100%/80% (reader 2), respectively. Unweighted Kappa was κ = 0,70 (95% CI 0,48‑0,92), indicating “substantial” interrater reliability. In comparison, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV (positive and negative predictive values) for restrictions of the optic nerve in CRAO were 55%/70%/65%/61% (reader 1) and 25%/100%/100%/57% (reader 2). Inter-rater reliability was “fair” with unweighted Kappa κ = 0,32 (95% CI 0,09‑0,56). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal diffusion restrictions were present in a majority of CRAO patients and detectable with reasonable sensitivity, high specificity and substantial inter-rater reliability. Further studies are necessary to study time dependency of retinal diffusion restrictions, improve image quality and investigate the reliability of retinal DWI to discern CRAO from other causes of acute loss of vision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-020-00955-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8463394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84633942021-10-08 Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study Danyel, L. A. Bohner, G. Connolly, F. Siebert, E. Clin Neuroradiol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion abnormalities of the retina and optic nerve in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) using standard stroke diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). METHODS: In this case-control study, DWI scans of patients with nonarteritic CRAO were retrospectively assessed for acute ischemia of the retina and optic nerve. Two neuroradiologists, blinded for patient diagnosis, randomly evaluated DWI of CRAO patients and controls (a collective of stroke and transient ischemic attack [TIA] patients) for restrictions of the retina and optic nerve. We calculated statistical quality criteria and analyzed inter-rater reliability using unweighted Kappa statistics. RESULTS: 20 CRAO patients (60,6 ± 17 years) and 20 controls (60,7 ± 17 years) were included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for retinal DWI restrictions were 75%/80%/79%/76% (reader 1) and 75%/100%/100%/80% (reader 2), respectively. Unweighted Kappa was κ = 0,70 (95% CI 0,48‑0,92), indicating “substantial” interrater reliability. In comparison, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV (positive and negative predictive values) for restrictions of the optic nerve in CRAO were 55%/70%/65%/61% (reader 1) and 25%/100%/100%/57% (reader 2). Inter-rater reliability was “fair” with unweighted Kappa κ = 0,32 (95% CI 0,09‑0,56). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal diffusion restrictions were present in a majority of CRAO patients and detectable with reasonable sensitivity, high specificity and substantial inter-rater reliability. Further studies are necessary to study time dependency of retinal diffusion restrictions, improve image quality and investigate the reliability of retinal DWI to discern CRAO from other causes of acute loss of vision. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-020-00955-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8463394/ /pubmed/32936308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00955-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Danyel, L. A.
Bohner, G.
Connolly, F.
Siebert, E.
Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_full Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_short Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_sort standard diffusion-weighted mri for the diagnosis of central retinal artery occlusion: a case-control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32936308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00955-6
work_keys_str_mv AT danyella standarddiffusionweightedmriforthediagnosisofcentralretinalarteryocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT bohnerg standarddiffusionweightedmriforthediagnosisofcentralretinalarteryocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT connollyf standarddiffusionweightedmriforthediagnosisofcentralretinalarteryocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT sieberte standarddiffusionweightedmriforthediagnosisofcentralretinalarteryocclusionacasecontrolstudy