Cargando…
Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study
PURPOSE: Urinary retention (UR) is common in older patients. The aim of this observational cohort study was to measure the prevalence of UR in patients aged ≥ 75 years on admission to an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit and to determine which at risk group would benefit from screening. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00495-3 |
_version_ | 1784572397316210688 |
---|---|
author | Fagard, Katleen Hermans, Kasper Deschodt, Mieke Van de Wouwer, Sofie Vander Aa, Frank Flamaing, Johan |
author_facet | Fagard, Katleen Hermans, Kasper Deschodt, Mieke Van de Wouwer, Sofie Vander Aa, Frank Flamaing, Johan |
author_sort | Fagard, Katleen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Urinary retention (UR) is common in older patients. The aim of this observational cohort study was to measure the prevalence of UR in patients aged ≥ 75 years on admission to an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit and to determine which at risk group would benefit from screening. METHODS: Post-void residual volumes (PVR) were measured within 3 days of admission with an ultrasound bladder scan. Uni- and multivariable analysis were used to determine risk factors associated with PVR ≥ 150 and ≥ 300 millilitres. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients, mean age 84.6 years, were included. The male/female ratio was 0.7. Patients with PVR ≥ 150 (29.8%) had more urological comorbidities, symptoms of overflow incontinence, voiding difficulties, subtotal voiding, faecal impaction, urinary tract infection (UTI) and were more frequently referred because of urinary symptoms. Patients with PVR ≥ 300 lived less at home, had more urological comorbidities, dysuria, voiding difficulties, subtotal voiding, constipation, faecal impaction, UTI, detrusor relaxants, and were more frequently referred because of urinary symptoms. Voiding difficulties and referral because of urinary symptoms were independently associated with PVR ≥ 150. Not living at home, reporting subtotal voiding, constipation, and referral because of urinary symptoms were independently associated with PVR ≥ 300. CONCLUSION: Screening for UR on admission to an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit is most indicated in patients with urinary and defaecation problems. However, because the prevalence was high, because UR was also observed in patients without these problems, and history taking may be difficult, the threshold for PVR measurement in acutely ill geriatric patients should be low. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NTC04715971, January 19, 2021 (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00495-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8463401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84634012021-10-08 Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study Fagard, Katleen Hermans, Kasper Deschodt, Mieke Van de Wouwer, Sofie Vander Aa, Frank Flamaing, Johan Eur Geriatr Med Research Paper PURPOSE: Urinary retention (UR) is common in older patients. The aim of this observational cohort study was to measure the prevalence of UR in patients aged ≥ 75 years on admission to an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit and to determine which at risk group would benefit from screening. METHODS: Post-void residual volumes (PVR) were measured within 3 days of admission with an ultrasound bladder scan. Uni- and multivariable analysis were used to determine risk factors associated with PVR ≥ 150 and ≥ 300 millilitres. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients, mean age 84.6 years, were included. The male/female ratio was 0.7. Patients with PVR ≥ 150 (29.8%) had more urological comorbidities, symptoms of overflow incontinence, voiding difficulties, subtotal voiding, faecal impaction, urinary tract infection (UTI) and were more frequently referred because of urinary symptoms. Patients with PVR ≥ 300 lived less at home, had more urological comorbidities, dysuria, voiding difficulties, subtotal voiding, constipation, faecal impaction, UTI, detrusor relaxants, and were more frequently referred because of urinary symptoms. Voiding difficulties and referral because of urinary symptoms were independently associated with PVR ≥ 150. Not living at home, reporting subtotal voiding, constipation, and referral because of urinary symptoms were independently associated with PVR ≥ 300. CONCLUSION: Screening for UR on admission to an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit is most indicated in patients with urinary and defaecation problems. However, because the prevalence was high, because UR was also observed in patients without these problems, and history taking may be difficult, the threshold for PVR measurement in acutely ill geriatric patients should be low. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NTC04715971, January 19, 2021 (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00495-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8463401/ /pubmed/33870476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00495-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Fagard, Katleen Hermans, Kasper Deschodt, Mieke Van de Wouwer, Sofie Vander Aa, Frank Flamaing, Johan Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study |
title | Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study |
title_full | Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study |
title_short | Urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study |
title_sort | urinary retention on an acute geriatric hospitalisation unit: prevalence, risk factors and the role of screening, an observational cohort study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00495-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fagardkatleen urinaryretentiononanacutegeriatrichospitalisationunitprevalenceriskfactorsandtheroleofscreeninganobservationalcohortstudy AT hermanskasper urinaryretentiononanacutegeriatrichospitalisationunitprevalenceriskfactorsandtheroleofscreeninganobservationalcohortstudy AT deschodtmieke urinaryretentiononanacutegeriatrichospitalisationunitprevalenceriskfactorsandtheroleofscreeninganobservationalcohortstudy AT vandewouwersofie urinaryretentiononanacutegeriatrichospitalisationunitprevalenceriskfactorsandtheroleofscreeninganobservationalcohortstudy AT vanderaafrank urinaryretentiononanacutegeriatrichospitalisationunitprevalenceriskfactorsandtheroleofscreeninganobservationalcohortstudy AT flamaingjohan urinaryretentiononanacutegeriatrichospitalisationunitprevalenceriskfactorsandtheroleofscreeninganobservationalcohortstudy |