Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process

This year’s theme for Peer Review Week is “Identity”, with a focus on promoting equity in peer review practices and recognizing how personal identity can influence the process. While many researchers may involve trainees with their reviews, not all will acknowledge the contributions made by these ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Q&A
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34561526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02646-5
_version_ 1784572423381712896
collection PubMed
description This year’s theme for Peer Review Week is “Identity”, with a focus on promoting equity in peer review practices and recognizing how personal identity can influence the process. While many researchers may involve trainees with their reviews, not all will acknowledge the contributions made by these early-career researchers or request that journals provide them with direct recognition. In this Q&A, we asked pairs of faculty and post-doctoral fellows who previously co-reviewed manuscripts at Communications Biology to reflect on their experiences with peer review, and the importance of including and recognizing early-career researchers as part of this process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8463562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84635622021-10-22 Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process Commun Biol Q&A This year’s theme for Peer Review Week is “Identity”, with a focus on promoting equity in peer review practices and recognizing how personal identity can influence the process. While many researchers may involve trainees with their reviews, not all will acknowledge the contributions made by these early-career researchers or request that journals provide them with direct recognition. In this Q&A, we asked pairs of faculty and post-doctoral fellows who previously co-reviewed manuscripts at Communications Biology to reflect on their experiences with peer review, and the importance of including and recognizing early-career researchers as part of this process. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8463562/ /pubmed/34561526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02646-5 Text en © Springer Nature Limited 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Q&A
Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_full Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_fullStr Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_full_unstemmed Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_short Transparency and training in peer review: Discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
title_sort transparency and training in peer review: discussing the contributions of early-career researchers to the review process
topic Q&A
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34561526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02646-5

Ejemplares similares