Cargando…
Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features
Olfactory loss, motor impairment, anxiety/depression, and REM-sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) are prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) features. PD risk prediction models typically dichotomize test results and apply likelihood ratios (LRs) to scores above and below cut-offs. We investigate whether LRs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34561458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-021-00226-2 |
_version_ | 1784572445491986432 |
---|---|
author | Bestwick, Jonathan P. Auger, Stephen D. Schrag, Anette E. Grosset, Donald G. Kanavou, Sofia Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew J. Cuzick, Jack Noyce, Alastair J. |
author_facet | Bestwick, Jonathan P. Auger, Stephen D. Schrag, Anette E. Grosset, Donald G. Kanavou, Sofia Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew J. Cuzick, Jack Noyce, Alastair J. |
author_sort | Bestwick, Jonathan P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Olfactory loss, motor impairment, anxiety/depression, and REM-sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) are prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) features. PD risk prediction models typically dichotomize test results and apply likelihood ratios (LRs) to scores above and below cut-offs. We investigate whether LRs for specific test values could enhance classification between PD and controls. PD patient data on smell (UPSIT), possible RBD (RBD Screening Questionnaire), and anxiety/depression (LADS) were taken from the Tracking Parkinson’s study (n = 1046). For motor impairment (BRAIN test) in PD cases, published data were supplemented (n = 87). Control data (HADS for anxiety/depression) were taken from the PREDICT-PD pilot study (n = 1314). UPSIT, RBDSQ, and anxiety/depression data were analysed using logistic regression to determine which items were associated with PD. Gaussian distributions were fitted to BRAIN test scores. LRs were calculated from logistic regression models or score distributions. False-positive rates (FPRs) for specified detection rates (DRs) were calculated. Sixteen odours were associated with PD; LRs for this set ranged from 0.005 to 5511. Six RBDSQ and seven anxiety/depression questions were associated with PD; LRs ranged from 0.35 to 69 and from 0.002 to 402, respectively. BRAIN test LRs ranged from 0.16 to 1311. For a 70% DR, the FPR was 2.4% for the 16 odours, 4.6% for anxiety/depression, 16.0% for the BRAIN test, and 20.0% for the RBDSQ. Specific selections of (prodromal) PD marker features rather than dichotomized marker test results optimize PD classification. Such optimized classification models could improve the ability of algorithms to detect prodromal PD; however, prospective studies are needed to investigate their value for PD-prediction models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8463675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84636752021-10-08 Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features Bestwick, Jonathan P. Auger, Stephen D. Schrag, Anette E. Grosset, Donald G. Kanavou, Sofia Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew J. Cuzick, Jack Noyce, Alastair J. NPJ Parkinsons Dis Article Olfactory loss, motor impairment, anxiety/depression, and REM-sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) are prodromal Parkinson’s disease (PD) features. PD risk prediction models typically dichotomize test results and apply likelihood ratios (LRs) to scores above and below cut-offs. We investigate whether LRs for specific test values could enhance classification between PD and controls. PD patient data on smell (UPSIT), possible RBD (RBD Screening Questionnaire), and anxiety/depression (LADS) were taken from the Tracking Parkinson’s study (n = 1046). For motor impairment (BRAIN test) in PD cases, published data were supplemented (n = 87). Control data (HADS for anxiety/depression) were taken from the PREDICT-PD pilot study (n = 1314). UPSIT, RBDSQ, and anxiety/depression data were analysed using logistic regression to determine which items were associated with PD. Gaussian distributions were fitted to BRAIN test scores. LRs were calculated from logistic regression models or score distributions. False-positive rates (FPRs) for specified detection rates (DRs) were calculated. Sixteen odours were associated with PD; LRs for this set ranged from 0.005 to 5511. Six RBDSQ and seven anxiety/depression questions were associated with PD; LRs ranged from 0.35 to 69 and from 0.002 to 402, respectively. BRAIN test LRs ranged from 0.16 to 1311. For a 70% DR, the FPR was 2.4% for the 16 odours, 4.6% for anxiety/depression, 16.0% for the BRAIN test, and 20.0% for the RBDSQ. Specific selections of (prodromal) PD marker features rather than dichotomized marker test results optimize PD classification. Such optimized classification models could improve the ability of algorithms to detect prodromal PD; however, prospective studies are needed to investigate their value for PD-prediction models. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8463675/ /pubmed/34561458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-021-00226-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Bestwick, Jonathan P. Auger, Stephen D. Schrag, Anette E. Grosset, Donald G. Kanavou, Sofia Giovannoni, Gavin Lees, Andrew J. Cuzick, Jack Noyce, Alastair J. Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features |
title | Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features |
title_full | Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features |
title_fullStr | Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features |
title_short | Optimising classification of Parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features |
title_sort | optimising classification of parkinson’s disease based on motor, olfactory, neuropsychiatric and sleep features |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34561458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41531-021-00226-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bestwickjonathanp optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT augerstephend optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT schraganettee optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT grossetdonaldg optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT kanavousofia optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT giovannonigavin optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT leesandrewj optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT cuzickjack optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures AT noycealastairj optimisingclassificationofparkinsonsdiseasebasedonmotorolfactoryneuropsychiatricandsleepfeatures |