Cargando…

Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities

INTRODUCTION: Reductions in traffic speed can potentially offer multiple health and public health benefits. In 2016, implementation of 20mph (30kph) speed limit interventions began in Edinburgh (city-wide) and Belfast (city centre). The aims of this paper are to describe 1) the broad theoretical app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milton, Karen, Kelly, Michael P., Baker, Graham, Cleland, Claire, Cope, Andy, Craig, Neil, Foster, Charlie, Hunter, Ruth, Kee, Frank, Kelly, Paul, Nightingale, Glenna, Turner, Kieran, Williams, Andrew J., Woodcock, James, Jepson, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101141
_version_ 1784572480515473408
author Milton, Karen
Kelly, Michael P.
Baker, Graham
Cleland, Claire
Cope, Andy
Craig, Neil
Foster, Charlie
Hunter, Ruth
Kee, Frank
Kelly, Paul
Nightingale, Glenna
Turner, Kieran
Williams, Andrew J.
Woodcock, James
Jepson, Ruth
author_facet Milton, Karen
Kelly, Michael P.
Baker, Graham
Cleland, Claire
Cope, Andy
Craig, Neil
Foster, Charlie
Hunter, Ruth
Kee, Frank
Kelly, Paul
Nightingale, Glenna
Turner, Kieran
Williams, Andrew J.
Woodcock, James
Jepson, Ruth
author_sort Milton, Karen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Reductions in traffic speed can potentially offer multiple health and public health benefits. In 2016, implementation of 20mph (30kph) speed limit interventions began in Edinburgh (city-wide) and Belfast (city centre). The aims of this paper are to describe 1) the broad theoretical approach and design of two natural experimental studies to evaluate the 20mph speed limits in Edinburgh and Belfast and 2) how these studies allowed us to test and explore theoretical mechanisms of 20mph speed limit interventions. METHODS: The evaluation consisted of several work packages, each with different research foci, including the political decision-making processes that led to the schemes, their implementation processes, outcomes (including traffic speed, perceptions of safety, and casualties) and cost effectiveness. We used a combination of routinely and locally collected quantitative data and primary quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: The evaluation identified many contextual factors influencing the likelihood of 20mph speed limits reaching the political agenda. There were substantial differences between the two sites in several aspects related to implementation. Reductions in speed resulted in significant reductions in collisions and casualties, particularly in Edinburgh, which had higher average speed at baseline. The monetary value of collisions and casualties prevented are likely to exceed the costs of the intervention and thus the overall balance of costs and benefits is likely to be favourable. CONCLUSIONS: Innovative study designs, including natural experiments, are important for assessing the impact of ‘real world’ public health interventions. Using multiple methods, this project enabled a deeper understanding of not only the effects of the intervention but the factors that explain how and why the intervention and the effects did or did not occur. Importantly it has shown that 20mph speed limits can lead to reductions in speed, collisions and casualties, and are therefore an effective public health intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8463832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84638322021-10-01 Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities Milton, Karen Kelly, Michael P. Baker, Graham Cleland, Claire Cope, Andy Craig, Neil Foster, Charlie Hunter, Ruth Kee, Frank Kelly, Paul Nightingale, Glenna Turner, Kieran Williams, Andrew J. Woodcock, James Jepson, Ruth J Transp Health Article INTRODUCTION: Reductions in traffic speed can potentially offer multiple health and public health benefits. In 2016, implementation of 20mph (30kph) speed limit interventions began in Edinburgh (city-wide) and Belfast (city centre). The aims of this paper are to describe 1) the broad theoretical approach and design of two natural experimental studies to evaluate the 20mph speed limits in Edinburgh and Belfast and 2) how these studies allowed us to test and explore theoretical mechanisms of 20mph speed limit interventions. METHODS: The evaluation consisted of several work packages, each with different research foci, including the political decision-making processes that led to the schemes, their implementation processes, outcomes (including traffic speed, perceptions of safety, and casualties) and cost effectiveness. We used a combination of routinely and locally collected quantitative data and primary quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: The evaluation identified many contextual factors influencing the likelihood of 20mph speed limits reaching the political agenda. There were substantial differences between the two sites in several aspects related to implementation. Reductions in speed resulted in significant reductions in collisions and casualties, particularly in Edinburgh, which had higher average speed at baseline. The monetary value of collisions and casualties prevented are likely to exceed the costs of the intervention and thus the overall balance of costs and benefits is likely to be favourable. CONCLUSIONS: Innovative study designs, including natural experiments, are important for assessing the impact of ‘real world’ public health interventions. Using multiple methods, this project enabled a deeper understanding of not only the effects of the intervention but the factors that explain how and why the intervention and the effects did or did not occur. Importantly it has shown that 20mph speed limits can lead to reductions in speed, collisions and casualties, and are therefore an effective public health intervention. Elsevier 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8463832/ /pubmed/34603959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101141 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Milton, Karen
Kelly, Michael P.
Baker, Graham
Cleland, Claire
Cope, Andy
Craig, Neil
Foster, Charlie
Hunter, Ruth
Kee, Frank
Kelly, Paul
Nightingale, Glenna
Turner, Kieran
Williams, Andrew J.
Woodcock, James
Jepson, Ruth
Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities
title Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities
title_full Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities
title_fullStr Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities
title_full_unstemmed Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities
title_short Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities
title_sort use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major uk cities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101141
work_keys_str_mv AT miltonkaren useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT kellymichaelp useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT bakergraham useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT clelandclaire useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT copeandy useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT craigneil useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT fostercharlie useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT hunterruth useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT keefrank useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT kellypaul useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT nightingaleglenna useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT turnerkieran useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT williamsandrewj useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT woodcockjames useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities
AT jepsonruth useofnaturalexperimentalstudiestoevaluate20mphspeedlimitsintwomajorukcities