Cargando…
Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective surgical treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Side-effects may, however, be induced when the DBS lead is placed suboptimally. Currently, lower field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 or 3 Tesla (T) is used for tar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34560531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102829 |
_version_ | 1784572495897034752 |
---|---|
author | Isaacs, Bethany R. Heijmans, Margot Kuijf, Mark L. Kubben, Pieter L. Ackermans, Linda Temel, Yasin Keuken, Max C. Forstmann, Birte U. |
author_facet | Isaacs, Bethany R. Heijmans, Margot Kuijf, Mark L. Kubben, Pieter L. Ackermans, Linda Temel, Yasin Keuken, Max C. Forstmann, Birte U. |
author_sort | Isaacs, Bethany R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective surgical treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Side-effects may, however, be induced when the DBS lead is placed suboptimally. Currently, lower field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 or 3 Tesla (T) is used for targeting. Ultra-high-field MRI (7 T and above) can obtain superior anatomical information and might therefore be better suited for targeting. This study aims to test whether optimized 7 T imaging protocols result in less variable targeting of the STN for DBS compared to clinically utilized 3 T images. Three DBS-experienced neurosurgeons determined the optimal STN DBS target site on three repetitions of 3 T-T2, 7 T-T2*, 7 T-R2* and 7 T-QSM images for five PD patients. The distance in millimetres between the three repetitive coordinates was used as an index of targeting variability and was compared between field strength, MRI contrast and repetition with a Bayesian ANOVA. Further, the target coordinates were registered to MNI space, and anatomical coordinates were compared between field strength, MRI contrast and repetition using a Bayesian ANOVA. The results indicate that the neurosurgeons are stable in selecting the DBS target site across MRI field strength, MRI contrast and repetitions. The analysis of the coordinates in MNI space however revealed that the actual selected location of the electrode is seemingly more ventral when using the 3 T scan compared to the 7 T scans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8463907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84639072021-10-01 Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging Isaacs, Bethany R. Heijmans, Margot Kuijf, Mark L. Kubben, Pieter L. Ackermans, Linda Temel, Yasin Keuken, Max C. Forstmann, Birte U. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective surgical treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Side-effects may, however, be induced when the DBS lead is placed suboptimally. Currently, lower field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 or 3 Tesla (T) is used for targeting. Ultra-high-field MRI (7 T and above) can obtain superior anatomical information and might therefore be better suited for targeting. This study aims to test whether optimized 7 T imaging protocols result in less variable targeting of the STN for DBS compared to clinically utilized 3 T images. Three DBS-experienced neurosurgeons determined the optimal STN DBS target site on three repetitions of 3 T-T2, 7 T-T2*, 7 T-R2* and 7 T-QSM images for five PD patients. The distance in millimetres between the three repetitive coordinates was used as an index of targeting variability and was compared between field strength, MRI contrast and repetition with a Bayesian ANOVA. Further, the target coordinates were registered to MNI space, and anatomical coordinates were compared between field strength, MRI contrast and repetition using a Bayesian ANOVA. The results indicate that the neurosurgeons are stable in selecting the DBS target site across MRI field strength, MRI contrast and repetitions. The analysis of the coordinates in MNI space however revealed that the actual selected location of the electrode is seemingly more ventral when using the 3 T scan compared to the 7 T scans. Elsevier 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8463907/ /pubmed/34560531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102829 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Isaacs, Bethany R. Heijmans, Margot Kuijf, Mark L. Kubben, Pieter L. Ackermans, Linda Temel, Yasin Keuken, Max C. Forstmann, Birte U. Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | variability in subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation with 3 and 7 tesla magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34560531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isaacsbethanyr variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT heijmansmargot variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT kuijfmarkl variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT kubbenpieterl variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT ackermanslinda variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT temelyasin variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT keukenmaxc variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging AT forstmannbirteu variabilityinsubthalamicnucleustargetingfordeepbrainstimulationwith3and7teslamagneticresonanceimaging |