Cargando…
New aspects of the esophageal histology of the domestic goat (Capra hircus) and European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)
The present study examines the esophageal wall of animals from two distinct families of the Ruminantia: domestic goats and European roe deer. Five fragments were collected from the entire length of the esophageal wall in five goats and four roe deer and subjected to microscopic and morphometric anal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.555 |
Sumario: | The present study examines the esophageal wall of animals from two distinct families of the Ruminantia: domestic goats and European roe deer. Five fragments were collected from the entire length of the esophageal wall in five goats and four roe deer and subjected to microscopic and morphometric analyses. All layers of the esophageal wall except the tela submucosa were found to be thicker in the goats. In both species, the esophagus was lined by parakeratinized stratified squamous epithelium, and the tela submucosa was deprived of glands along its entire length. However, the structure of the lamina muscularis mucosae was better developed in goats: it was found to be discontinuous in the proximal part, and then became fused in the cervical part, that is around the most proximal quarter of its length. In contrast, in roe deer, the lamina muscularis mucosae began as sparse, thin muscle bundles at the pharyngeal‐esophageal junction, which thickened and clustered further down the esophagus, but did not fuse. Our findings regarding the microscopic structure of the ruminant esophagus are not fully consistent with the widely‐accepted view and suggest that the histological structure of the esophagus demonstrates interspecies variation within this large suborder. More precisely, species‐specific differences can be seen regarding the presence of esophageal glands and parakeratinized epithelium, and in the organization of the lamina muscularis mucosae. |
---|