Cargando…
Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is shown to not only improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) but also activate the immune system. Considering the immune-activating function of IRE, IRE may enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584438 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S331023 |
_version_ | 1784572619584962560 |
---|---|
author | He, Chaobin Sun, Shuxin Zhang, Yu Li, Shengping |
author_facet | He, Chaobin Sun, Shuxin Zhang, Yu Li, Shengping |
author_sort | He, Chaobin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is shown to not only improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) but also activate the immune system. Considering the immune-activating function of IRE, IRE may enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of LAPC. We aimed to compare the effect and safety of IRE combined with toripalimab versus IRE alone for LAPC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from LAPC patients treated with IRE plus toripalimab (240mg, 7 days after IRE) or IRE alone at Sun Yat‑sen University Cancer Center. Overall and progression-free survival and treatment-related adverse events were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: From August 2015 to June 2020, a total of 85 patients were collected and analyzed in this study: 70 in the IRE group and 15 in the IRE plus toripalimab group. The IRE plus toripalimab group showed longer OS [44.33 months (95% CI 17.39–71.27) versus 23.37 months (95% CI 21.20–25.54), P=0.010] and PFS [27.5 months (95% CI not reached) versus 10.6 months (95% CI 7.79–13.42), P=0.036], compared with IRE group. There were no treatment-related deaths in all patients of this study. Although pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, abscess, vomiting and gastroparesis were a little more common in IRE plus toripalimab group, no significant differences in the rates of all adverse events between these two groups were observed. CONCLUSION: IRE plus toripalimab had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival in LAPC compared with IRE alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8464362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84643622021-09-27 Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer He, Chaobin Sun, Shuxin Zhang, Yu Li, Shengping J Inflamm Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is shown to not only improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) but also activate the immune system. Considering the immune-activating function of IRE, IRE may enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of LAPC. We aimed to compare the effect and safety of IRE combined with toripalimab versus IRE alone for LAPC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from LAPC patients treated with IRE plus toripalimab (240mg, 7 days after IRE) or IRE alone at Sun Yat‑sen University Cancer Center. Overall and progression-free survival and treatment-related adverse events were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: From August 2015 to June 2020, a total of 85 patients were collected and analyzed in this study: 70 in the IRE group and 15 in the IRE plus toripalimab group. The IRE plus toripalimab group showed longer OS [44.33 months (95% CI 17.39–71.27) versus 23.37 months (95% CI 21.20–25.54), P=0.010] and PFS [27.5 months (95% CI not reached) versus 10.6 months (95% CI 7.79–13.42), P=0.036], compared with IRE group. There were no treatment-related deaths in all patients of this study. Although pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, abscess, vomiting and gastroparesis were a little more common in IRE plus toripalimab group, no significant differences in the rates of all adverse events between these two groups were observed. CONCLUSION: IRE plus toripalimab had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival in LAPC compared with IRE alone. Dove 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8464362/ /pubmed/34584438 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S331023 Text en © 2021 He et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research He, Chaobin Sun, Shuxin Zhang, Yu Li, Shengping Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer |
title | Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer |
title_full | Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer |
title_fullStr | Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer |
title_short | Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer |
title_sort | irreversible electroporation plus anti-pd-1 antibody versus irreversible electroporation alone for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584438 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S331023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hechaobin irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT sunshuxin irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT zhangyu irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT lishengping irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer |