Cargando…

Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is shown to not only improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) but also activate the immune system. Considering the immune-activating function of IRE, IRE may enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Chaobin, Sun, Shuxin, Zhang, Yu, Li, Shengping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584438
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S331023
_version_ 1784572619584962560
author He, Chaobin
Sun, Shuxin
Zhang, Yu
Li, Shengping
author_facet He, Chaobin
Sun, Shuxin
Zhang, Yu
Li, Shengping
author_sort He, Chaobin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is shown to not only improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) but also activate the immune system. Considering the immune-activating function of IRE, IRE may enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of LAPC. We aimed to compare the effect and safety of IRE combined with toripalimab versus IRE alone for LAPC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from LAPC patients treated with IRE plus toripalimab (240mg, 7 days after IRE) or IRE alone at Sun Yat‑sen University Cancer Center. Overall and progression-free survival and treatment-related adverse events were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: From August 2015 to June 2020, a total of 85 patients were collected and analyzed in this study: 70 in the IRE group and 15 in the IRE plus toripalimab group. The IRE plus toripalimab group showed longer OS [44.33 months (95% CI 17.39–71.27) versus 23.37 months (95% CI 21.20–25.54), P=0.010] and PFS [27.5 months (95% CI not reached) versus 10.6 months (95% CI 7.79–13.42), P=0.036], compared with IRE group. There were no treatment-related deaths in all patients of this study. Although pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, abscess, vomiting and gastroparesis were a little more common in IRE plus toripalimab group, no significant differences in the rates of all adverse events between these two groups were observed. CONCLUSION: IRE plus toripalimab had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival in LAPC compared with IRE alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8464362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84643622021-09-27 Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer He, Chaobin Sun, Shuxin Zhang, Yu Li, Shengping J Inflamm Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is shown to not only improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) but also activate the immune system. Considering the immune-activating function of IRE, IRE may enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of LAPC. We aimed to compare the effect and safety of IRE combined with toripalimab versus IRE alone for LAPC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from LAPC patients treated with IRE plus toripalimab (240mg, 7 days after IRE) or IRE alone at Sun Yat‑sen University Cancer Center. Overall and progression-free survival and treatment-related adverse events were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: From August 2015 to June 2020, a total of 85 patients were collected and analyzed in this study: 70 in the IRE group and 15 in the IRE plus toripalimab group. The IRE plus toripalimab group showed longer OS [44.33 months (95% CI 17.39–71.27) versus 23.37 months (95% CI 21.20–25.54), P=0.010] and PFS [27.5 months (95% CI not reached) versus 10.6 months (95% CI 7.79–13.42), P=0.036], compared with IRE group. There were no treatment-related deaths in all patients of this study. Although pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, abscess, vomiting and gastroparesis were a little more common in IRE plus toripalimab group, no significant differences in the rates of all adverse events between these two groups were observed. CONCLUSION: IRE plus toripalimab had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival in LAPC compared with IRE alone. Dove 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8464362/ /pubmed/34584438 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S331023 Text en © 2021 He et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
He, Chaobin
Sun, Shuxin
Zhang, Yu
Li, Shengping
Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_full Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_fullStr Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_short Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_sort irreversible electroporation plus anti-pd-1 antibody versus irreversible electroporation alone for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584438
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S331023
work_keys_str_mv AT hechaobin irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT sunshuxin irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT zhangyu irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT lishengping irreversibleelectroporationplusantipd1antibodyversusirreversibleelectroporationaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer