Cargando…
The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
PURPOSE: The expanding armamentarium of wearable activity monitors (WAMs) offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with real-life patient activity data. These data could guide clinical decision making or serve as a measure of treatment outcome. However, infor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5 |
_version_ | 1784572654286536704 |
---|---|
author | Kos, Milan Pijnappel, Esther N. Buffart, Laurien M. Balvers, Britt R. Kampshoff, Caroline S. Wilmink, Johanna W. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. |
author_facet | Kos, Milan Pijnappel, Esther N. Buffart, Laurien M. Balvers, Britt R. Kampshoff, Caroline S. Wilmink, Johanna W. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. |
author_sort | Kos, Milan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The expanding armamentarium of wearable activity monitors (WAMs) offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with real-life patient activity data. These data could guide clinical decision making or serve as a measure of treatment outcome. However, information on the association between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) monitored with wearables (i.e., WAM metrics) and PS in patients with cancer is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between WAM metrics and PS in patients with cancer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies that assessed the association between WAM metrics and performance status among adults with cancer. We extracted information on study design and population, WAM type and different activity metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to risk of bias assessment and subsequent best evidence synthesis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this review. All studies reported on different combinations of WAM metrics including: daily steps (n = 8), SB (n = 5), mean activity counts (n = 4), dichotomous circadian rest-activity index (n = 3), and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (n = 3). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, WAM used, and reporting of results. We found moderate evidence for a positive weak-to-moderate association between WAM-assessed PA and PS and a weak-to-moderate negative association between WAM-assessed SB metrics and PS. CONCLUSION: Weak-to-moderate associations between WAM metrics and PS suggest that WAM data and physician-assessed PS cannot be used interchangeably. Instead, WAM data could serve as a dynamic and objective supplement measurement of patients’ physical performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8464563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84645632021-10-08 The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review Kos, Milan Pijnappel, Esther N. Buffart, Laurien M. Balvers, Britt R. Kampshoff, Caroline S. Wilmink, Johanna W. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. Support Care Cancer Review Article PURPOSE: The expanding armamentarium of wearable activity monitors (WAMs) offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with real-life patient activity data. These data could guide clinical decision making or serve as a measure of treatment outcome. However, information on the association between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) monitored with wearables (i.e., WAM metrics) and PS in patients with cancer is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between WAM metrics and PS in patients with cancer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies that assessed the association between WAM metrics and performance status among adults with cancer. We extracted information on study design and population, WAM type and different activity metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to risk of bias assessment and subsequent best evidence synthesis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this review. All studies reported on different combinations of WAM metrics including: daily steps (n = 8), SB (n = 5), mean activity counts (n = 4), dichotomous circadian rest-activity index (n = 3), and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (n = 3). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, WAM used, and reporting of results. We found moderate evidence for a positive weak-to-moderate association between WAM-assessed PA and PS and a weak-to-moderate negative association between WAM-assessed SB metrics and PS. CONCLUSION: Weak-to-moderate associations between WAM metrics and PS suggest that WAM data and physician-assessed PS cannot be used interchangeably. Instead, WAM data could serve as a dynamic and objective supplement measurement of patients’ physical performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8464563/ /pubmed/34117567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Kos, Milan Pijnappel, Esther N. Buffart, Laurien M. Balvers, Britt R. Kampshoff, Caroline S. Wilmink, Johanna W. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review |
title | The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review |
title_full | The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review |
title_short | The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review |
title_sort | association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kosmilan theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT pijnappelesthern theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT buffartlaurienm theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT balversbrittr theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT kampshoffcarolines theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT wilminkjohannaw theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT vanoijenmartijngh theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT kosmilan associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT pijnappelesthern associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT buffartlaurienm associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT balversbrittr associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT kampshoffcarolines associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT wilminkjohannaw associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview AT vanoijenmartijngh associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview |