Cargando…

The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review

PURPOSE: The expanding armamentarium of wearable activity monitors (WAMs) offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with real-life patient activity data. These data could guide clinical decision making or serve as a measure of treatment outcome. However, infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kos, Milan, Pijnappel, Esther N., Buffart, Laurien M., Balvers, Britt R., Kampshoff, Caroline S., Wilmink, Johanna W., van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M., van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5
_version_ 1784572654286536704
author Kos, Milan
Pijnappel, Esther N.
Buffart, Laurien M.
Balvers, Britt R.
Kampshoff, Caroline S.
Wilmink, Johanna W.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
author_facet Kos, Milan
Pijnappel, Esther N.
Buffart, Laurien M.
Balvers, Britt R.
Kampshoff, Caroline S.
Wilmink, Johanna W.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
author_sort Kos, Milan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The expanding armamentarium of wearable activity monitors (WAMs) offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with real-life patient activity data. These data could guide clinical decision making or serve as a measure of treatment outcome. However, information on the association between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) monitored with wearables (i.e., WAM metrics) and PS in patients with cancer is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between WAM metrics and PS in patients with cancer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies that assessed the association between WAM metrics and performance status among adults with cancer. We extracted information on study design and population, WAM type and different activity metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to risk of bias assessment and subsequent best evidence synthesis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this review. All studies reported on different combinations of WAM metrics including: daily steps (n = 8), SB (n = 5), mean activity counts (n = 4), dichotomous circadian rest-activity index (n = 3), and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (n = 3). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, WAM used, and reporting of results. We found moderate evidence for a positive weak-to-moderate association between WAM-assessed PA and PS and a weak-to-moderate negative association between WAM-assessed SB metrics and PS. CONCLUSION: Weak-to-moderate associations between WAM metrics and PS suggest that WAM data and physician-assessed PS cannot be used interchangeably. Instead, WAM data could serve as a dynamic and objective supplement measurement of patients’ physical performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8464563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84645632021-10-08 The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review Kos, Milan Pijnappel, Esther N. Buffart, Laurien M. Balvers, Britt R. Kampshoff, Caroline S. Wilmink, Johanna W. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. van Oijen, Martijn G. H. Support Care Cancer Review Article PURPOSE: The expanding armamentarium of wearable activity monitors (WAMs) offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with real-life patient activity data. These data could guide clinical decision making or serve as a measure of treatment outcome. However, information on the association between physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) monitored with wearables (i.e., WAM metrics) and PS in patients with cancer is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between WAM metrics and PS in patients with cancer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies that assessed the association between WAM metrics and performance status among adults with cancer. We extracted information on study design and population, WAM type and different activity metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to risk of bias assessment and subsequent best evidence synthesis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this review. All studies reported on different combinations of WAM metrics including: daily steps (n = 8), SB (n = 5), mean activity counts (n = 4), dichotomous circadian rest-activity index (n = 3), and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (n = 3). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, WAM used, and reporting of results. We found moderate evidence for a positive weak-to-moderate association between WAM-assessed PA and PS and a weak-to-moderate negative association between WAM-assessed SB metrics and PS. CONCLUSION: Weak-to-moderate associations between WAM metrics and PS suggest that WAM data and physician-assessed PS cannot be used interchangeably. Instead, WAM data could serve as a dynamic and objective supplement measurement of patients’ physical performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8464563/ /pubmed/34117567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Kos, Milan
Pijnappel, Esther N.
Buffart, Laurien M.
Balvers, Britt R.
Kampshoff, Caroline S.
Wilmink, Johanna W.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
title The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
title_full The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
title_fullStr The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
title_short The association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
title_sort association between wearable activity monitor metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06234-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kosmilan theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT pijnappelesthern theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT buffartlaurienm theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT balversbrittr theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT kampshoffcarolines theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT wilminkjohannaw theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT vanoijenmartijngh theassociationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT kosmilan associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT pijnappelesthern associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT buffartlaurienm associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT balversbrittr associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT kampshoffcarolines associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT wilminkjohannaw associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview
AT vanoijenmartijngh associationbetweenwearableactivitymonitormetricsandperformancestatusinoncologyasystematicreview