Cargando…

Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients

PURPOSE: The on-body injector (OBI) automatically delivers pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy (CTx), thus eliminating the need of return visits to the medical office for guideline-compliant pegfilgrastim administration. The CONVENIENCE study aimed to evaluate patient, nurse, and physician pref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metz, Michael, Semsek, Dieter, Rogmans, Gunther, Hutzschenreuter, Ulrich, Fietz, Thomas, Harde, Johanna, Zacharias, Stefan, Hielscher, Carsten, Lorenz, Andreas, Zahn, Mark-Oliver, Guth, Dagmar, Liebers, Steffen, Berghorn, Michael, Grebhardt, Sina, Matillon, Christiane D., Egerer, Gerlinde, Potthoff, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06230-9
_version_ 1784572656065970176
author Metz, Michael
Semsek, Dieter
Rogmans, Gunther
Hutzschenreuter, Ulrich
Fietz, Thomas
Harde, Johanna
Zacharias, Stefan
Hielscher, Carsten
Lorenz, Andreas
Zahn, Mark-Oliver
Guth, Dagmar
Liebers, Steffen
Berghorn, Michael
Grebhardt, Sina
Matillon, Christiane D.
Egerer, Gerlinde
Potthoff, Karin
author_facet Metz, Michael
Semsek, Dieter
Rogmans, Gunther
Hutzschenreuter, Ulrich
Fietz, Thomas
Harde, Johanna
Zacharias, Stefan
Hielscher, Carsten
Lorenz, Andreas
Zahn, Mark-Oliver
Guth, Dagmar
Liebers, Steffen
Berghorn, Michael
Grebhardt, Sina
Matillon, Christiane D.
Egerer, Gerlinde
Potthoff, Karin
author_sort Metz, Michael
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The on-body injector (OBI) automatically delivers pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy (CTx), thus eliminating the need of return visits to the medical office for guideline-compliant pegfilgrastim administration. The CONVENIENCE study aimed to evaluate patient, nurse, and physician preferences as well as health economics for pegfilgrastim administration either with OBI or manually using a pre-filled syringe (PS). METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer, receiving two or three weekly anthracycline/cyclophosphamide or three weekly taxane-based CTx, and patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving first-line R-CHOP-14 or -21 were randomized 1:1 to receive both pegfilgrastim application forms for four consecutive CTx cycles in an alternating sequence starting either with OBI or PS. Primary endpoint was patient preference, assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were evaluable in the per-protocol analysis. Patients slightly preferred OBI over PS (OBI, n = 133, 43.2%; vs. PS, n = 111, 36.0%; p-value = 0.159), while study nurses slightly preferred PS (n = 19, 46.3%) over OBI (n = 18, 43.9%) and physicians clearly preferred PS (n = 24, 58.8%) over OBI (n = 15, 36.6%). Among patients with preference for OBI, saving of time was their major reason for preference (53.4%). Pegfilgrastim was administered 24–72 h after each CTx cycle in 97.6% of OBI and 63.1% of PS applications. CONCLUSION: The OBI was slightly preferred by patients and saving time was the major reason for their preference. PS was physicians’ most preferable choice and slightly preferred by nurses. Using OBI, pegfilgrastim was almost always administered within the time period recommended by current guidelines, while it was often not applied as specified using PS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No: ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03619993. Registered on June 25, 2018
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8464571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84645712021-10-08 Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients Metz, Michael Semsek, Dieter Rogmans, Gunther Hutzschenreuter, Ulrich Fietz, Thomas Harde, Johanna Zacharias, Stefan Hielscher, Carsten Lorenz, Andreas Zahn, Mark-Oliver Guth, Dagmar Liebers, Steffen Berghorn, Michael Grebhardt, Sina Matillon, Christiane D. Egerer, Gerlinde Potthoff, Karin Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The on-body injector (OBI) automatically delivers pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy (CTx), thus eliminating the need of return visits to the medical office for guideline-compliant pegfilgrastim administration. The CONVENIENCE study aimed to evaluate patient, nurse, and physician preferences as well as health economics for pegfilgrastim administration either with OBI or manually using a pre-filled syringe (PS). METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer, receiving two or three weekly anthracycline/cyclophosphamide or three weekly taxane-based CTx, and patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving first-line R-CHOP-14 or -21 were randomized 1:1 to receive both pegfilgrastim application forms for four consecutive CTx cycles in an alternating sequence starting either with OBI or PS. Primary endpoint was patient preference, assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were evaluable in the per-protocol analysis. Patients slightly preferred OBI over PS (OBI, n = 133, 43.2%; vs. PS, n = 111, 36.0%; p-value = 0.159), while study nurses slightly preferred PS (n = 19, 46.3%) over OBI (n = 18, 43.9%) and physicians clearly preferred PS (n = 24, 58.8%) over OBI (n = 15, 36.6%). Among patients with preference for OBI, saving of time was their major reason for preference (53.4%). Pegfilgrastim was administered 24–72 h after each CTx cycle in 97.6% of OBI and 63.1% of PS applications. CONCLUSION: The OBI was slightly preferred by patients and saving time was the major reason for their preference. PS was physicians’ most preferable choice and slightly preferred by nurses. Using OBI, pegfilgrastim was almost always administered within the time period recommended by current guidelines, while it was often not applied as specified using PS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No: ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03619993. Registered on June 25, 2018 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8464571/ /pubmed/33956213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06230-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Metz, Michael
Semsek, Dieter
Rogmans, Gunther
Hutzschenreuter, Ulrich
Fietz, Thomas
Harde, Johanna
Zacharias, Stefan
Hielscher, Carsten
Lorenz, Andreas
Zahn, Mark-Oliver
Guth, Dagmar
Liebers, Steffen
Berghorn, Michael
Grebhardt, Sina
Matillon, Christiane D.
Egerer, Gerlinde
Potthoff, Karin
Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients
title Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients
title_full Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients
title_fullStr Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients
title_short Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients
title_sort patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the convenience study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06230-9
work_keys_str_mv AT metzmichael patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT semsekdieter patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT rogmansgunther patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT hutzschenreuterulrich patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT fietzthomas patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT hardejohanna patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT zachariasstefan patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT hielschercarsten patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT lorenzandreas patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT zahnmarkoliver patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT guthdagmar patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT lieberssteffen patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT berghornmichael patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT grebhardtsina patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT matillonchristianed patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT egerergerlinde patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients
AT potthoffkarin patientnurseandphysicianpreferencesfinalresultsoftheconveniencestudyevaluatingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisviaprefilledsyringeoronbodyinjectorincancerpatients