Cargando…

Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality

SIMPLE SUMMARY: A rapid and reliable method for assessing colostrum quality is needed to ensure enough immunoglobulins available to offspring in order to avoid the failure of the passive transfer of immunity. This study evaluates MilkoScan FT-plus as a rapid tool for the evaluation of immunoglobulin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spina, Anna Antonella, Ceniti, Carlotta, Trimboli, Francesca, Britti, Domenico, Lopreiato, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092587
_version_ 1784572694475309056
author Spina, Anna Antonella
Ceniti, Carlotta
Trimboli, Francesca
Britti, Domenico
Lopreiato, Vincenzo
author_facet Spina, Anna Antonella
Ceniti, Carlotta
Trimboli, Francesca
Britti, Domenico
Lopreiato, Vincenzo
author_sort Spina, Anna Antonella
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: A rapid and reliable method for assessing colostrum quality is needed to ensure enough immunoglobulins available to offspring in order to avoid the failure of the passive transfer of immunity. This study evaluates MilkoScan FT-plus as a rapid tool for the evaluation of immunoglobulin content indirectly by protein content measurement and thus colostrum quality with a particular focus on bovine and ovine colostrum. The results indicate that MilkoScan FT-plus has good agreement with the reference method for the measurement of immunoglobulin concentration in colostrum represented by the radial immunodiffusion method. ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate MilkoScan FT-plus for the estimation of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) content in bovine and ovine colostrum. Between April and May 2016, a total of 94 colostrum samples (54 from Simmental dairy cows and 39 from Sarda ewes) were collected within 6 h (T0) and after 24 h (T24) from parturition. Colostrum samples were subjected to the radial immunodiffusion (RID) assay for the quantification of IgG and to MilkoScan FT-plus for the estimation of protein content (TP, %), which was then used as an indirect method for the evaluation of colostrum quality. To compare the two methods, correlation and regression analysis of IgG quantification by RID and protein (%) content estimation by MilkoScan FT-plus data was performed using Procedure CORR and Procedure REG of SAS, respectively (version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Thresholds for the classification of good colostrum quality (as determined by RID assay, the gold standard method) were set at 50 g of IgG/L in cows and 20 g of IgG/L in ewes. The concentration of IgG in bovine colostrum assayed by RID showed a variation ranging from 41.45 to 199.97 g/L with an average of 99.85 ± 40.84 g/L at T0, and from 2.83 to 75.93 g/L with an average of 19.76 ± 19.01 g/L at T24. Regarding ovine colostrum, the concentration of IgG assayed by RID ranged from 34.45 to 156.32 g/L with an average value of 77.82 ± 37.58 g/L at T0, and from 5.6 to 69.74 g/L with an average of 27.90 ± 19.81 g/L at T24. Colostrum TP ranged from 3.70 to 23.96% for bovine colostrum and 6.32 to 22.88% for ovine colostrum using MilkoScan FT-plus. MilkoScan FT-plus and RID data were highly and significantly correlated (r = 0.91 for bovine and r = 0.94 for ovine colostrum), and regression analysis showed a strong relationship between IgG concentration provided by RID assay and TP provided by MilkoScan FT-plus (R(2) = 0.84 and 0.88 for bovine and ovine, respectively). Optimal cut-off points for the greatest accuracy of TP (%) determined by MilkoScan FT-plus were 12.8% in cows [with 88.9% sensitivity (Se) and 100% specificity (Sp)] and 9% in ewes (with 96.7% Se and 100% Sp). In conclusion, these outcomes indicate that MilkoScan FT-plus as an indirect method may be a reliable tool for the estimation of the total IgG concentration and quality in bovine and ovine colostrum. Moreover, the cut-off levels of 12.8% for bovine and 9% for ovine of TP, seem sufficient to ensure that all poor-quality colostrum can be classified as such, with only a low proportion of good-quality colostrum being misclassified as poor-colostrum, thereby increasing the probability of delivering good-quality colostrum to new-born calves and lambs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8464752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84647522021-09-27 Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality Spina, Anna Antonella Ceniti, Carlotta Trimboli, Francesca Britti, Domenico Lopreiato, Vincenzo Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: A rapid and reliable method for assessing colostrum quality is needed to ensure enough immunoglobulins available to offspring in order to avoid the failure of the passive transfer of immunity. This study evaluates MilkoScan FT-plus as a rapid tool for the evaluation of immunoglobulin content indirectly by protein content measurement and thus colostrum quality with a particular focus on bovine and ovine colostrum. The results indicate that MilkoScan FT-plus has good agreement with the reference method for the measurement of immunoglobulin concentration in colostrum represented by the radial immunodiffusion method. ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate MilkoScan FT-plus for the estimation of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) content in bovine and ovine colostrum. Between April and May 2016, a total of 94 colostrum samples (54 from Simmental dairy cows and 39 from Sarda ewes) were collected within 6 h (T0) and after 24 h (T24) from parturition. Colostrum samples were subjected to the radial immunodiffusion (RID) assay for the quantification of IgG and to MilkoScan FT-plus for the estimation of protein content (TP, %), which was then used as an indirect method for the evaluation of colostrum quality. To compare the two methods, correlation and regression analysis of IgG quantification by RID and protein (%) content estimation by MilkoScan FT-plus data was performed using Procedure CORR and Procedure REG of SAS, respectively (version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Thresholds for the classification of good colostrum quality (as determined by RID assay, the gold standard method) were set at 50 g of IgG/L in cows and 20 g of IgG/L in ewes. The concentration of IgG in bovine colostrum assayed by RID showed a variation ranging from 41.45 to 199.97 g/L with an average of 99.85 ± 40.84 g/L at T0, and from 2.83 to 75.93 g/L with an average of 19.76 ± 19.01 g/L at T24. Regarding ovine colostrum, the concentration of IgG assayed by RID ranged from 34.45 to 156.32 g/L with an average value of 77.82 ± 37.58 g/L at T0, and from 5.6 to 69.74 g/L with an average of 27.90 ± 19.81 g/L at T24. Colostrum TP ranged from 3.70 to 23.96% for bovine colostrum and 6.32 to 22.88% for ovine colostrum using MilkoScan FT-plus. MilkoScan FT-plus and RID data were highly and significantly correlated (r = 0.91 for bovine and r = 0.94 for ovine colostrum), and regression analysis showed a strong relationship between IgG concentration provided by RID assay and TP provided by MilkoScan FT-plus (R(2) = 0.84 and 0.88 for bovine and ovine, respectively). Optimal cut-off points for the greatest accuracy of TP (%) determined by MilkoScan FT-plus were 12.8% in cows [with 88.9% sensitivity (Se) and 100% specificity (Sp)] and 9% in ewes (with 96.7% Se and 100% Sp). In conclusion, these outcomes indicate that MilkoScan FT-plus as an indirect method may be a reliable tool for the estimation of the total IgG concentration and quality in bovine and ovine colostrum. Moreover, the cut-off levels of 12.8% for bovine and 9% for ovine of TP, seem sufficient to ensure that all poor-quality colostrum can be classified as such, with only a low proportion of good-quality colostrum being misclassified as poor-colostrum, thereby increasing the probability of delivering good-quality colostrum to new-born calves and lambs. MDPI 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8464752/ /pubmed/34573557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092587 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Spina, Anna Antonella
Ceniti, Carlotta
Trimboli, Francesca
Britti, Domenico
Lopreiato, Vincenzo
Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality
title Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality
title_full Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality
title_fullStr Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality
title_short Suitability of Protein Content Measured by MilkoScan FT-Plus Milk Analyzer to Evaluate Bovine and Ovine Colostrum Quality
title_sort suitability of protein content measured by milkoscan ft-plus milk analyzer to evaluate bovine and ovine colostrum quality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092587
work_keys_str_mv AT spinaannaantonella suitabilityofproteincontentmeasuredbymilkoscanftplusmilkanalyzertoevaluatebovineandovinecolostrumquality
AT ceniticarlotta suitabilityofproteincontentmeasuredbymilkoscanftplusmilkanalyzertoevaluatebovineandovinecolostrumquality
AT trimbolifrancesca suitabilityofproteincontentmeasuredbymilkoscanftplusmilkanalyzertoevaluatebovineandovinecolostrumquality
AT brittidomenico suitabilityofproteincontentmeasuredbymilkoscanftplusmilkanalyzertoevaluatebovineandovinecolostrumquality
AT lopreiatovincenzo suitabilityofproteincontentmeasuredbymilkoscanftplusmilkanalyzertoevaluatebovineandovinecolostrumquality