Cargando…

Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years

In the last two decades, the interest in natural plant feed additives (PFA) as alternatives to synthetic vitamins in livestock nutrition has increased. After a systematic review, a total of 19 peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and 2020 were retained to evaluate the antioxidant effects of P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manuelian, Carmen L., Pitino, Rosario, Simoni, Marica, Mavrommatis, Alexandros, De Marchi, Massimo, Righi, Federico, Tsiplakou, Eleni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091461
_version_ 1784572721771839488
author Manuelian, Carmen L.
Pitino, Rosario
Simoni, Marica
Mavrommatis, Alexandros
De Marchi, Massimo
Righi, Federico
Tsiplakou, Eleni
author_facet Manuelian, Carmen L.
Pitino, Rosario
Simoni, Marica
Mavrommatis, Alexandros
De Marchi, Massimo
Righi, Federico
Tsiplakou, Eleni
author_sort Manuelian, Carmen L.
collection PubMed
description In the last two decades, the interest in natural plant feed additives (PFA) as alternatives to synthetic vitamins in livestock nutrition has increased. After a systematic review, a total of 19 peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and 2020 were retained to evaluate the antioxidant effects of PFA compared to synthetic antioxidant vitamins (mainly vitamin E; VitE) in livestock nutrition. These studies demonstrated that PFAs could be as efficient as VitE in counteracting oxidative stress in pigs, rabbits, and ruminants. However, PFAs only positively affected animals’ growth performance and feed efficiency in some monogastric studies. The PFA can affect antioxidant enzyme activity in a dose- and method of administration-dependent manner. The antioxidant capacity of both PFA and VitE were depressed in cows fed with diets rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Variability among studies could be related to species differences. Despite the interest of the feed industry sector in PFA, there are still very few studies evaluating their antioxidant effect in species other than poultry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8464857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84648572021-09-27 Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years Manuelian, Carmen L. Pitino, Rosario Simoni, Marica Mavrommatis, Alexandros De Marchi, Massimo Righi, Federico Tsiplakou, Eleni Antioxidants (Basel) Review In the last two decades, the interest in natural plant feed additives (PFA) as alternatives to synthetic vitamins in livestock nutrition has increased. After a systematic review, a total of 19 peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and 2020 were retained to evaluate the antioxidant effects of PFA compared to synthetic antioxidant vitamins (mainly vitamin E; VitE) in livestock nutrition. These studies demonstrated that PFAs could be as efficient as VitE in counteracting oxidative stress in pigs, rabbits, and ruminants. However, PFAs only positively affected animals’ growth performance and feed efficiency in some monogastric studies. The PFA can affect antioxidant enzyme activity in a dose- and method of administration-dependent manner. The antioxidant capacity of both PFA and VitE were depressed in cows fed with diets rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Variability among studies could be related to species differences. Despite the interest of the feed industry sector in PFA, there are still very few studies evaluating their antioxidant effect in species other than poultry. MDPI 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8464857/ /pubmed/34573094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091461 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Manuelian, Carmen L.
Pitino, Rosario
Simoni, Marica
Mavrommatis, Alexandros
De Marchi, Massimo
Righi, Federico
Tsiplakou, Eleni
Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years
title Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years
title_full Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years
title_fullStr Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years
title_full_unstemmed Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years
title_short Plant Feed Additives as Natural Alternatives to the Use of Synthetic Antioxidant Vitamins on Livestock Mammals’ Performances, Health, and Oxidative Status: A Review of the Literature in the Last 20 Years
title_sort plant feed additives as natural alternatives to the use of synthetic antioxidant vitamins on livestock mammals’ performances, health, and oxidative status: a review of the literature in the last 20 years
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091461
work_keys_str_mv AT manueliancarmenl plantfeedadditivesasnaturalalternativestotheuseofsyntheticantioxidantvitaminsonlivestockmammalsperformanceshealthandoxidativestatusareviewoftheliteratureinthelast20years
AT pitinorosario plantfeedadditivesasnaturalalternativestotheuseofsyntheticantioxidantvitaminsonlivestockmammalsperformanceshealthandoxidativestatusareviewoftheliteratureinthelast20years
AT simonimarica plantfeedadditivesasnaturalalternativestotheuseofsyntheticantioxidantvitaminsonlivestockmammalsperformanceshealthandoxidativestatusareviewoftheliteratureinthelast20years
AT mavrommatisalexandros plantfeedadditivesasnaturalalternativestotheuseofsyntheticantioxidantvitaminsonlivestockmammalsperformanceshealthandoxidativestatusareviewoftheliteratureinthelast20years
AT demarchimassimo plantfeedadditivesasnaturalalternativestotheuseofsyntheticantioxidantvitaminsonlivestockmammalsperformanceshealthandoxidativestatusareviewoftheliteratureinthelast20years
AT righifederico plantfeedadditivesasnaturalalternativestotheuseofsyntheticantioxidantvitaminsonlivestockmammalsperformanceshealthandoxidativestatusareviewoftheliteratureinthelast20years
AT tsiplakoueleni plantfeedadditivesasnaturalalternativestotheuseofsyntheticantioxidantvitaminsonlivestockmammalsperformanceshealthandoxidativestatusareviewoftheliteratureinthelast20years