Cargando…
Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing
Metal additive manufacturing is a major concern for advanced manufacturing industries thanks to its ability to manufacture complex-shaped parts in materials that are difficult to machine using conventional methods. Nowadays, it is increasingly being used in the industrial manufacturing of titanium-a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185366 |
_version_ | 1784572728281399296 |
---|---|
author | Atzeni, Eleonora Genna, Silvio Menna, Erica Rubino, Gianluca Salmi, Alessandro Trovalusci, Federica |
author_facet | Atzeni, Eleonora Genna, Silvio Menna, Erica Rubino, Gianluca Salmi, Alessandro Trovalusci, Federica |
author_sort | Atzeni, Eleonora |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metal additive manufacturing is a major concern for advanced manufacturing industries thanks to its ability to manufacture complex-shaped parts in materials that are difficult to machine using conventional methods. Nowadays, it is increasingly being used in the industrial manufacturing of titanium-alloy components for aerospace and medical industries; however, the main weakness of structural parts is the fatigue life, which is affected by surface quality, meaning the micro-cracking of small surface defects induced by the manufacturing process. Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Bed are proposed by the authors since they represent cost-effective and environment-friendly alternatives for automated surface finishing. A comparison between these two finishing technologies was established and discussed. Experimental tests investigated both mechanical properties and fatigue performances. The tests also focused on understanding the basic mechanisms involved in fatigue failures of machined Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated via Electron Beam Melting and the effects of operational parameters. X-ray tomography was used to evaluate the internal porosity to better explain the fatigue behaviour. The results demonstrated the capability of Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Beds to improve failure performances. Life Cycle Analysis was additionally performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technologies in terms of environmental impact and resource consumption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8464882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84648822021-09-27 Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing Atzeni, Eleonora Genna, Silvio Menna, Erica Rubino, Gianluca Salmi, Alessandro Trovalusci, Federica Materials (Basel) Article Metal additive manufacturing is a major concern for advanced manufacturing industries thanks to its ability to manufacture complex-shaped parts in materials that are difficult to machine using conventional methods. Nowadays, it is increasingly being used in the industrial manufacturing of titanium-alloy components for aerospace and medical industries; however, the main weakness of structural parts is the fatigue life, which is affected by surface quality, meaning the micro-cracking of small surface defects induced by the manufacturing process. Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Bed are proposed by the authors since they represent cost-effective and environment-friendly alternatives for automated surface finishing. A comparison between these two finishing technologies was established and discussed. Experimental tests investigated both mechanical properties and fatigue performances. The tests also focused on understanding the basic mechanisms involved in fatigue failures of machined Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated via Electron Beam Melting and the effects of operational parameters. X-ray tomography was used to evaluate the internal porosity to better explain the fatigue behaviour. The results demonstrated the capability of Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Beds to improve failure performances. Life Cycle Analysis was additionally performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technologies in terms of environmental impact and resource consumption. MDPI 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8464882/ /pubmed/34576590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185366 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Atzeni, Eleonora Genna, Silvio Menna, Erica Rubino, Gianluca Salmi, Alessandro Trovalusci, Federica Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing |
title | Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing |
title_full | Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing |
title_fullStr | Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing |
title_short | Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing |
title_sort | surface finishing of additive manufactured ti-6al-4v alloy: a comparison between abrasive fluidized bed and laser finishing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atzenieleonora surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing AT gennasilvio surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing AT mennaerica surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing AT rubinogianluca surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing AT salmialessandro surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing AT trovaluscifederica surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing |