Cargando…

Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing

Metal additive manufacturing is a major concern for advanced manufacturing industries thanks to its ability to manufacture complex-shaped parts in materials that are difficult to machine using conventional methods. Nowadays, it is increasingly being used in the industrial manufacturing of titanium-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atzeni, Eleonora, Genna, Silvio, Menna, Erica, Rubino, Gianluca, Salmi, Alessandro, Trovalusci, Federica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185366
_version_ 1784572728281399296
author Atzeni, Eleonora
Genna, Silvio
Menna, Erica
Rubino, Gianluca
Salmi, Alessandro
Trovalusci, Federica
author_facet Atzeni, Eleonora
Genna, Silvio
Menna, Erica
Rubino, Gianluca
Salmi, Alessandro
Trovalusci, Federica
author_sort Atzeni, Eleonora
collection PubMed
description Metal additive manufacturing is a major concern for advanced manufacturing industries thanks to its ability to manufacture complex-shaped parts in materials that are difficult to machine using conventional methods. Nowadays, it is increasingly being used in the industrial manufacturing of titanium-alloy components for aerospace and medical industries; however, the main weakness of structural parts is the fatigue life, which is affected by surface quality, meaning the micro-cracking of small surface defects induced by the manufacturing process. Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Bed are proposed by the authors since they represent cost-effective and environment-friendly alternatives for automated surface finishing. A comparison between these two finishing technologies was established and discussed. Experimental tests investigated both mechanical properties and fatigue performances. The tests also focused on understanding the basic mechanisms involved in fatigue failures of machined Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated via Electron Beam Melting and the effects of operational parameters. X-ray tomography was used to evaluate the internal porosity to better explain the fatigue behaviour. The results demonstrated the capability of Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Beds to improve failure performances. Life Cycle Analysis was additionally performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technologies in terms of environmental impact and resource consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8464882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84648822021-09-27 Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing Atzeni, Eleonora Genna, Silvio Menna, Erica Rubino, Gianluca Salmi, Alessandro Trovalusci, Federica Materials (Basel) Article Metal additive manufacturing is a major concern for advanced manufacturing industries thanks to its ability to manufacture complex-shaped parts in materials that are difficult to machine using conventional methods. Nowadays, it is increasingly being used in the industrial manufacturing of titanium-alloy components for aerospace and medical industries; however, the main weakness of structural parts is the fatigue life, which is affected by surface quality, meaning the micro-cracking of small surface defects induced by the manufacturing process. Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Bed are proposed by the authors since they represent cost-effective and environment-friendly alternatives for automated surface finishing. A comparison between these two finishing technologies was established and discussed. Experimental tests investigated both mechanical properties and fatigue performances. The tests also focused on understanding the basic mechanisms involved in fatigue failures of machined Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated via Electron Beam Melting and the effects of operational parameters. X-ray tomography was used to evaluate the internal porosity to better explain the fatigue behaviour. The results demonstrated the capability of Laser finishing and Abrasive Fluidized Beds to improve failure performances. Life Cycle Analysis was additionally performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technologies in terms of environmental impact and resource consumption. MDPI 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8464882/ /pubmed/34576590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185366 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Atzeni, Eleonora
Genna, Silvio
Menna, Erica
Rubino, Gianluca
Salmi, Alessandro
Trovalusci, Federica
Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing
title Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing
title_full Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing
title_fullStr Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing
title_full_unstemmed Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing
title_short Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comparison between Abrasive Fluidized Bed and Laser Finishing
title_sort surface finishing of additive manufactured ti-6al-4v alloy: a comparison between abrasive fluidized bed and laser finishing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8464882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14185366
work_keys_str_mv AT atzenieleonora surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing
AT gennasilvio surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing
AT mennaerica surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing
AT rubinogianluca surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing
AT salmialessandro surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing
AT trovaluscifederica surfacefinishingofadditivemanufacturedti6al4valloyacomparisonbetweenabrasivefluidizedbedandlaserfinishing