Cargando…
Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?
Background and Objectives: Insulin treatment may be initially required to stabilize patients presenting with metabolic crisis at type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) onset. Some patients with type 2 DM may need persistent insulin treatment. This study aimed to examine the predictive performance of no...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090902 |
_version_ | 1784572840493711360 |
---|---|
author | Chou, Wei-Chih Chou, Yen-Yin Pan, Yu-Wen Tsai, Meng-Che |
author_facet | Chou, Wei-Chih Chou, Yen-Yin Pan, Yu-Wen Tsai, Meng-Che |
author_sort | Chou, Wei-Chih |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Insulin treatment may be initially required to stabilize patients presenting with metabolic crisis at type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) onset. Some patients with type 2 DM may need persistent insulin treatment. This study aimed to examine the predictive performance of non-stimulated C-peptide level at the time of diagnosis for future insulin use in pediatric diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical charts of diabetic patients aged 18 years or younger in a medical center in southern Taiwan from January 2000 to December 2019. Clinical and individual data were collected at the time of DM diagnosis. Outcomes were persistent insulin use at the time of diagnosis, as well as at one and two years after diagnosis. Results: The final analysis included a total of 250 patients. The best cut-off point of non-stimulated C-peptide was 0.95 ng/mL, and the predictive indices for the insulin use were 0.84 for sensitivity and 0.94 for specificity at two years after DM diagnosis. Incorporating age at onset and presence of GAD antibodies can further increase the predictive power of non-stimulated C-peptide. Conclusions: The value of non-stimulated C-peptide at diabetic onset was feasible and effective for predicting future insulin treatment up to the time point of two years after diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8465312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84653122021-09-27 Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? Chou, Wei-Chih Chou, Yen-Yin Pan, Yu-Wen Tsai, Meng-Che Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Insulin treatment may be initially required to stabilize patients presenting with metabolic crisis at type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) onset. Some patients with type 2 DM may need persistent insulin treatment. This study aimed to examine the predictive performance of non-stimulated C-peptide level at the time of diagnosis for future insulin use in pediatric diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical charts of diabetic patients aged 18 years or younger in a medical center in southern Taiwan from January 2000 to December 2019. Clinical and individual data were collected at the time of DM diagnosis. Outcomes were persistent insulin use at the time of diagnosis, as well as at one and two years after diagnosis. Results: The final analysis included a total of 250 patients. The best cut-off point of non-stimulated C-peptide was 0.95 ng/mL, and the predictive indices for the insulin use were 0.84 for sensitivity and 0.94 for specificity at two years after DM diagnosis. Incorporating age at onset and presence of GAD antibodies can further increase the predictive power of non-stimulated C-peptide. Conclusions: The value of non-stimulated C-peptide at diabetic onset was feasible and effective for predicting future insulin treatment up to the time point of two years after diagnosis. MDPI 2021-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8465312/ /pubmed/34577825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090902 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chou, Wei-Chih Chou, Yen-Yin Pan, Yu-Wen Tsai, Meng-Che Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? |
title | Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? |
title_full | Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? |
title_fullStr | Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? |
title_short | Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? |
title_sort | is non-stimulated c-peptide at diagnosis a good predictive value for insulin use at two years after diagnosis in pediatric diabetic patients? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090902 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chouweichih isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients AT chouyenyin isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients AT panyuwen isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients AT tsaimengche isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients |