Cargando…

Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?

Background and Objectives: Insulin treatment may be initially required to stabilize patients presenting with metabolic crisis at type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) onset. Some patients with type 2 DM may need persistent insulin treatment. This study aimed to examine the predictive performance of no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Wei-Chih, Chou, Yen-Yin, Pan, Yu-Wen, Tsai, Meng-Che
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090902
_version_ 1784572840493711360
author Chou, Wei-Chih
Chou, Yen-Yin
Pan, Yu-Wen
Tsai, Meng-Che
author_facet Chou, Wei-Chih
Chou, Yen-Yin
Pan, Yu-Wen
Tsai, Meng-Che
author_sort Chou, Wei-Chih
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Insulin treatment may be initially required to stabilize patients presenting with metabolic crisis at type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) onset. Some patients with type 2 DM may need persistent insulin treatment. This study aimed to examine the predictive performance of non-stimulated C-peptide level at the time of diagnosis for future insulin use in pediatric diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical charts of diabetic patients aged 18 years or younger in a medical center in southern Taiwan from January 2000 to December 2019. Clinical and individual data were collected at the time of DM diagnosis. Outcomes were persistent insulin use at the time of diagnosis, as well as at one and two years after diagnosis. Results: The final analysis included a total of 250 patients. The best cut-off point of non-stimulated C-peptide was 0.95 ng/mL, and the predictive indices for the insulin use were 0.84 for sensitivity and 0.94 for specificity at two years after DM diagnosis. Incorporating age at onset and presence of GAD antibodies can further increase the predictive power of non-stimulated C-peptide. Conclusions: The value of non-stimulated C-peptide at diabetic onset was feasible and effective for predicting future insulin treatment up to the time point of two years after diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8465312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84653122021-09-27 Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients? Chou, Wei-Chih Chou, Yen-Yin Pan, Yu-Wen Tsai, Meng-Che Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Insulin treatment may be initially required to stabilize patients presenting with metabolic crisis at type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) onset. Some patients with type 2 DM may need persistent insulin treatment. This study aimed to examine the predictive performance of non-stimulated C-peptide level at the time of diagnosis for future insulin use in pediatric diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical charts of diabetic patients aged 18 years or younger in a medical center in southern Taiwan from January 2000 to December 2019. Clinical and individual data were collected at the time of DM diagnosis. Outcomes were persistent insulin use at the time of diagnosis, as well as at one and two years after diagnosis. Results: The final analysis included a total of 250 patients. The best cut-off point of non-stimulated C-peptide was 0.95 ng/mL, and the predictive indices for the insulin use were 0.84 for sensitivity and 0.94 for specificity at two years after DM diagnosis. Incorporating age at onset and presence of GAD antibodies can further increase the predictive power of non-stimulated C-peptide. Conclusions: The value of non-stimulated C-peptide at diabetic onset was feasible and effective for predicting future insulin treatment up to the time point of two years after diagnosis. MDPI 2021-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8465312/ /pubmed/34577825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090902 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chou, Wei-Chih
Chou, Yen-Yin
Pan, Yu-Wen
Tsai, Meng-Che
Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?
title Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?
title_full Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?
title_fullStr Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?
title_full_unstemmed Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?
title_short Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years after Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?
title_sort is non-stimulated c-peptide at diagnosis a good predictive value for insulin use at two years after diagnosis in pediatric diabetic patients?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34577825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090902
work_keys_str_mv AT chouweichih isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients
AT chouyenyin isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients
AT panyuwen isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients
AT tsaimengche isnonstimulatedcpeptideatdiagnosisagoodpredictivevalueforinsulinuseattwoyearsafterdiagnosisinpediatricdiabeticpatients