Cargando…

The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures

Icons have been widely utilized to describe and promote COVID-19 prevention measures. The purpose of this study was to analyze the preference and subjective design features of 133 existing icons associated with COVID-19 prevention measures published by the health and medical organizations of differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasetyo, Yogi Tri, Dewi, Ratna Sari, Balatbat, Naiomi M., Antonio, Michael Lancelot B., Chuenyindee, Thanatorn, Perwira Redi, Anak Agung Ngurah, Young, Michael Nayat, Diaz, John Francis T., Kurata, Yoshiki B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091115
_version_ 1784572933187829760
author Prasetyo, Yogi Tri
Dewi, Ratna Sari
Balatbat, Naiomi M.
Antonio, Michael Lancelot B.
Chuenyindee, Thanatorn
Perwira Redi, Anak Agung Ngurah
Young, Michael Nayat
Diaz, John Francis T.
Kurata, Yoshiki B.
author_facet Prasetyo, Yogi Tri
Dewi, Ratna Sari
Balatbat, Naiomi M.
Antonio, Michael Lancelot B.
Chuenyindee, Thanatorn
Perwira Redi, Anak Agung Ngurah
Young, Michael Nayat
Diaz, John Francis T.
Kurata, Yoshiki B.
author_sort Prasetyo, Yogi Tri
collection PubMed
description Icons have been widely utilized to describe and promote COVID-19 prevention measures. The purpose of this study was to analyze the preference and subjective design features of 133 existing icons associated with COVID-19 prevention measures published by the health and medical organizations of different countries. The 133 icons represent nineteen different function names, such as “Wash Hands” and “Wear Face Mask”. A total of 57 participants were recruited to perform two different tests: ranking test and subjective rating test. The ranking test was conducted to elicit the preference ranking of seven icon designs representing each function name. It was followed by a subjective rating test using 13 semantic scales on the two most preferred icons to analyze their perceived quality. Spearmen correlation was applied to derive the possible correlations between users’ rankings and the semantic scales, and Friedman’s test was also performed to determine the true difference between ranking in terms of each semantic scale to provide a fully meaningful interpretation of the data. Generally, findings from the current study showed that the image presented in the icon is the key point that affects the icons’ perceived quality. Interestingly, Spearman’s correlation analysis between preference ranking and semantic scales showed that vague–clear, weak–strong, incompatible–compatible, and ineffective–effective were the four strongest semantic scales that highly correlated with the preference ranking. Considering the significant relationships between the semantic distances and the functions, images depicted in an icon should be realistic and as close as possible to its respected function to cater to users’ preferences. In addition, the results of Spearman’s correlation and Friedman’s test also inferred that compatibility and clarity of icon elements are the main factors determining a particular icon’s preferability. This study is the first comprehensive study to evaluate the icons associated with the COVID-19 prevention measures. The findings of this study can be utilized as the basis for redesigning icons, particularly for icons related to COVID-19 prevention measures. Furthermore, the approach can also be applied and extended for evaluating other medical icons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8465661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84656612021-09-27 The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures Prasetyo, Yogi Tri Dewi, Ratna Sari Balatbat, Naiomi M. Antonio, Michael Lancelot B. Chuenyindee, Thanatorn Perwira Redi, Anak Agung Ngurah Young, Michael Nayat Diaz, John Francis T. Kurata, Yoshiki B. Healthcare (Basel) Article Icons have been widely utilized to describe and promote COVID-19 prevention measures. The purpose of this study was to analyze the preference and subjective design features of 133 existing icons associated with COVID-19 prevention measures published by the health and medical organizations of different countries. The 133 icons represent nineteen different function names, such as “Wash Hands” and “Wear Face Mask”. A total of 57 participants were recruited to perform two different tests: ranking test and subjective rating test. The ranking test was conducted to elicit the preference ranking of seven icon designs representing each function name. It was followed by a subjective rating test using 13 semantic scales on the two most preferred icons to analyze their perceived quality. Spearmen correlation was applied to derive the possible correlations between users’ rankings and the semantic scales, and Friedman’s test was also performed to determine the true difference between ranking in terms of each semantic scale to provide a fully meaningful interpretation of the data. Generally, findings from the current study showed that the image presented in the icon is the key point that affects the icons’ perceived quality. Interestingly, Spearman’s correlation analysis between preference ranking and semantic scales showed that vague–clear, weak–strong, incompatible–compatible, and ineffective–effective were the four strongest semantic scales that highly correlated with the preference ranking. Considering the significant relationships between the semantic distances and the functions, images depicted in an icon should be realistic and as close as possible to its respected function to cater to users’ preferences. In addition, the results of Spearman’s correlation and Friedman’s test also inferred that compatibility and clarity of icon elements are the main factors determining a particular icon’s preferability. This study is the first comprehensive study to evaluate the icons associated with the COVID-19 prevention measures. The findings of this study can be utilized as the basis for redesigning icons, particularly for icons related to COVID-19 prevention measures. Furthermore, the approach can also be applied and extended for evaluating other medical icons. MDPI 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8465661/ /pubmed/34574888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091115 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prasetyo, Yogi Tri
Dewi, Ratna Sari
Balatbat, Naiomi M.
Antonio, Michael Lancelot B.
Chuenyindee, Thanatorn
Perwira Redi, Anak Agung Ngurah
Young, Michael Nayat
Diaz, John Francis T.
Kurata, Yoshiki B.
The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures
title The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures
title_full The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures
title_fullStr The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures
title_full_unstemmed The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures
title_short The Evaluation of Preference and Perceived Quality of Health Communication Icons Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Measures
title_sort evaluation of preference and perceived quality of health communication icons associated with covid-19 prevention measures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091115
work_keys_str_mv AT prasetyoyogitri theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT dewiratnasari theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT balatbatnaiomim theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT antoniomichaellancelotb theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT chuenyindeethanatorn theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT perwiraredianakagungngurah theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT youngmichaelnayat theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT diazjohnfrancist theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT kuratayoshikib theevaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT prasetyoyogitri evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT dewiratnasari evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT balatbatnaiomim evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT antoniomichaellancelotb evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT chuenyindeethanatorn evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT perwiraredianakagungngurah evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT youngmichaelnayat evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT diazjohnfrancist evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures
AT kuratayoshikib evaluationofpreferenceandperceivedqualityofhealthcommunicationiconsassociatedwithcovid19preventionmeasures