Cargando…

A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is recognised as an essential part of health research. In addition to providing an opportunity for patients to shape health research and acquire research skills, in the inpatient mental health setting, PPIE may have additional value in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aboaja, Anne, Atewogboye, Oluwatosin, Arslan, Mudassar, Parry-Newton, Lucia, Wilson, Lindsey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0
_version_ 1784572943751184384
author Aboaja, Anne
Atewogboye, Oluwatosin
Arslan, Mudassar
Parry-Newton, Lucia
Wilson, Lindsey
author_facet Aboaja, Anne
Atewogboye, Oluwatosin
Arslan, Mudassar
Parry-Newton, Lucia
Wilson, Lindsey
author_sort Aboaja, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is recognised as an essential part of health research. In addition to providing an opportunity for patients to shape health research and acquire research skills, in the inpatient mental health setting, PPIE may have additional value in providing meaningful activity and enhancing recovery, as defined using connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment (CHIME) principles. However, there have been challenges in applying PPIE principles in secure mental health inpatient settings. An eight -session PPIE programme (“Discovery Group”) was designed to support patient-led research in a secure mental health hospital. This feasibility study aims to evaluate the acceptability of the programme from the perspective of patients and identify potential outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective single-arm post-programme evaluation of Discovery Group was undertaken. Participants attended an evaluation workshop where they were interviewed individually to complete an acceptability questionnaire designed using the domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Participants also completed an outcomes questionnaire, which included CHIME-based recovery items, and were invited to share their ideas for programme improvement on posters. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Direct content analysis was applied to qualitative data. RESULTS: In our sample, eight participants attended at least one session of the discovery group with one patient attending all sessions. Most of the participants felt positive about taking part in the group and expressed interest in joining another group in future. All participants experienced some burden from the effort required during group sessions, but a low level of opportunity cost in terms of the extent to which they perceived they had to forfeit benefits to participate in the programme.. Some described the group as effective in helping them learn about research. Of the five CHIME recovery domains, only connectedness was reported as a benefit of the group. The participants valued the opportunity to use their time well and demonstrate that they were undertaking purposeful activity as part of their rehabilitation and recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Discovery Group is a tool to overcome barriers to effective PPIE in research in a secure inpatient mental health setting. The programme has a high level of acceptability among participants and offered several potential outcomes which require testing through further study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8465701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84657012021-09-27 A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting Aboaja, Anne Atewogboye, Oluwatosin Arslan, Mudassar Parry-Newton, Lucia Wilson, Lindsey Res Involv Engagem Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is recognised as an essential part of health research. In addition to providing an opportunity for patients to shape health research and acquire research skills, in the inpatient mental health setting, PPIE may have additional value in providing meaningful activity and enhancing recovery, as defined using connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment (CHIME) principles. However, there have been challenges in applying PPIE principles in secure mental health inpatient settings. An eight -session PPIE programme (“Discovery Group”) was designed to support patient-led research in a secure mental health hospital. This feasibility study aims to evaluate the acceptability of the programme from the perspective of patients and identify potential outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective single-arm post-programme evaluation of Discovery Group was undertaken. Participants attended an evaluation workshop where they were interviewed individually to complete an acceptability questionnaire designed using the domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Participants also completed an outcomes questionnaire, which included CHIME-based recovery items, and were invited to share their ideas for programme improvement on posters. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Direct content analysis was applied to qualitative data. RESULTS: In our sample, eight participants attended at least one session of the discovery group with one patient attending all sessions. Most of the participants felt positive about taking part in the group and expressed interest in joining another group in future. All participants experienced some burden from the effort required during group sessions, but a low level of opportunity cost in terms of the extent to which they perceived they had to forfeit benefits to participate in the programme.. Some described the group as effective in helping them learn about research. Of the five CHIME recovery domains, only connectedness was reported as a benefit of the group. The participants valued the opportunity to use their time well and demonstrate that they were undertaking purposeful activity as part of their rehabilitation and recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Discovery Group is a tool to overcome barriers to effective PPIE in research in a secure inpatient mental health setting. The programme has a high level of acceptability among participants and offered several potential outcomes which require testing through further study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0. BioMed Central 2021-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8465701/ /pubmed/34563267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aboaja, Anne
Atewogboye, Oluwatosin
Arslan, Mudassar
Parry-Newton, Lucia
Wilson, Lindsey
A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting
title A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting
title_full A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting
title_fullStr A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting
title_full_unstemmed A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting
title_short A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting
title_sort feasibility evaluation of discovery group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0
work_keys_str_mv AT aboajaanne afeasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT atewogboyeoluwatosin afeasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT arslanmudassar afeasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT parrynewtonlucia afeasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT wilsonlindsey afeasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT aboajaanne feasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT atewogboyeoluwatosin feasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT arslanmudassar feasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT parrynewtonlucia feasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting
AT wilsonlindsey feasibilityevaluationofdiscoverygroupdeterminingtheacceptabilityandpotentialoutcomesofapatientledresearchgroupinasecurementalhealthinpatientsetting