Cargando…

Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Neurosurgical decisions for patients with glioblastoma depend on visual inspection of a preoperative MR scan to determine the tumor characteristics. To avoid subjective estimates and manual tumor delineation, automatic methods and standard reporting are necessary. We compared and ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouget, David, Eijgelaar, Roelant S., Pedersen, André, Kommers, Ivar, Ardon, Hilko, Barkhof, Frederik, Bello, Lorenzo, Berger, Mitchel S., Nibali, Marco Conti, Furtner, Julia, Fyllingen, Even Hovig, Hervey-Jumper, Shawn, Idema, Albert J. S., Kiesel, Barbara, Kloet, Alfred, Mandonnet, Emmanuel, Müller, Domenique M. J., Robe, Pierre A., Rossi, Marco, Sagberg, Lisa M., Sciortino, Tommaso, Van den Brink, Wimar A., Wagemakers, Michiel, Widhalm, Georg, Witte, Marnix G., Zwinderman, Aeilko H., Reinertsen, Ingerid, De Witt Hamer, Philip C., Solheim, Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34572900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184674
_version_ 1784572957031399424
author Bouget, David
Eijgelaar, Roelant S.
Pedersen, André
Kommers, Ivar
Ardon, Hilko
Barkhof, Frederik
Bello, Lorenzo
Berger, Mitchel S.
Nibali, Marco Conti
Furtner, Julia
Fyllingen, Even Hovig
Hervey-Jumper, Shawn
Idema, Albert J. S.
Kiesel, Barbara
Kloet, Alfred
Mandonnet, Emmanuel
Müller, Domenique M. J.
Robe, Pierre A.
Rossi, Marco
Sagberg, Lisa M.
Sciortino, Tommaso
Van den Brink, Wimar A.
Wagemakers, Michiel
Widhalm, Georg
Witte, Marnix G.
Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
Reinertsen, Ingerid
De Witt Hamer, Philip C.
Solheim, Ole
author_facet Bouget, David
Eijgelaar, Roelant S.
Pedersen, André
Kommers, Ivar
Ardon, Hilko
Barkhof, Frederik
Bello, Lorenzo
Berger, Mitchel S.
Nibali, Marco Conti
Furtner, Julia
Fyllingen, Even Hovig
Hervey-Jumper, Shawn
Idema, Albert J. S.
Kiesel, Barbara
Kloet, Alfred
Mandonnet, Emmanuel
Müller, Domenique M. J.
Robe, Pierre A.
Rossi, Marco
Sagberg, Lisa M.
Sciortino, Tommaso
Van den Brink, Wimar A.
Wagemakers, Michiel
Widhalm, Georg
Witte, Marnix G.
Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
Reinertsen, Ingerid
De Witt Hamer, Philip C.
Solheim, Ole
author_sort Bouget, David
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Neurosurgical decisions for patients with glioblastoma depend on visual inspection of a preoperative MR scan to determine the tumor characteristics. To avoid subjective estimates and manual tumor delineation, automatic methods and standard reporting are necessary. We compared and extensively assessed the performances of two deep learning architectures on the task of automatic tumor segmentation. A total of 1887 patients from 14 institutions, manually delineated by a human rater, were compared to automated segmentations generated by neural networks. The automated segmentations were in excellent agreement with the manual segmentations, and external validity, as well as generalizability were demonstrated. Together with automatic tumor feature computation and standardized reporting, our Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging Reporting And Data System (GSI-RADS) exhibited the potential for more accurate data-driven clinical decisions. The trained models and software are open-source and open-access, enabling comparisons among surgical cohorts, multicenter trials, and patient registries. ABSTRACT: For patients with presumed glioblastoma, essential tumor characteristics are determined from preoperative MR images to optimize the treatment strategy. This procedure is time-consuming and subjective, if performed by crude eyeballing or manually. The standardized GSI-RADS aims to provide neurosurgeons with automatic tumor segmentations to extract tumor features rapidly and objectively. In this study, we improved automatic tumor segmentation and compared the agreement with manual raters, describe the technical details of the different components of GSI-RADS, and determined their speed. Two recent neural network architectures were considered for the segmentation task: nnU-Net and AGU-Net. Two preprocessing schemes were introduced to investigate the tradeoff between performance and processing speed. A summarized description of the tumor feature extraction and standardized reporting process is included. The trained architectures for automatic segmentation and the code for computing the standardized report are distributed as open-source and as open-access software. Validation studies were performed on a dataset of 1594 gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI volumes from 13 hospitals and 293 T1-weighted MRI volumes from the BraTS challenge. The glioblastoma tumor core segmentation reached a Dice score slightly below 90%, a patientwise F1-score close to 99%, and a 95th percentile Hausdorff distance slightly below [Formula: see text] mm on average with either architecture and the heavy preprocessing scheme. A patient MRI volume can be segmented in less than one minute, and a standardized report can be generated in up to five minutes. The proposed GSI-RADS software showed robust performance on a large collection of MRI volumes from various hospitals and generated results within a reasonable runtime.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8465753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84657532021-09-27 Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task Bouget, David Eijgelaar, Roelant S. Pedersen, André Kommers, Ivar Ardon, Hilko Barkhof, Frederik Bello, Lorenzo Berger, Mitchel S. Nibali, Marco Conti Furtner, Julia Fyllingen, Even Hovig Hervey-Jumper, Shawn Idema, Albert J. S. Kiesel, Barbara Kloet, Alfred Mandonnet, Emmanuel Müller, Domenique M. J. Robe, Pierre A. Rossi, Marco Sagberg, Lisa M. Sciortino, Tommaso Van den Brink, Wimar A. Wagemakers, Michiel Widhalm, Georg Witte, Marnix G. Zwinderman, Aeilko H. Reinertsen, Ingerid De Witt Hamer, Philip C. Solheim, Ole Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Neurosurgical decisions for patients with glioblastoma depend on visual inspection of a preoperative MR scan to determine the tumor characteristics. To avoid subjective estimates and manual tumor delineation, automatic methods and standard reporting are necessary. We compared and extensively assessed the performances of two deep learning architectures on the task of automatic tumor segmentation. A total of 1887 patients from 14 institutions, manually delineated by a human rater, were compared to automated segmentations generated by neural networks. The automated segmentations were in excellent agreement with the manual segmentations, and external validity, as well as generalizability were demonstrated. Together with automatic tumor feature computation and standardized reporting, our Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging Reporting And Data System (GSI-RADS) exhibited the potential for more accurate data-driven clinical decisions. The trained models and software are open-source and open-access, enabling comparisons among surgical cohorts, multicenter trials, and patient registries. ABSTRACT: For patients with presumed glioblastoma, essential tumor characteristics are determined from preoperative MR images to optimize the treatment strategy. This procedure is time-consuming and subjective, if performed by crude eyeballing or manually. The standardized GSI-RADS aims to provide neurosurgeons with automatic tumor segmentations to extract tumor features rapidly and objectively. In this study, we improved automatic tumor segmentation and compared the agreement with manual raters, describe the technical details of the different components of GSI-RADS, and determined their speed. Two recent neural network architectures were considered for the segmentation task: nnU-Net and AGU-Net. Two preprocessing schemes were introduced to investigate the tradeoff between performance and processing speed. A summarized description of the tumor feature extraction and standardized reporting process is included. The trained architectures for automatic segmentation and the code for computing the standardized report are distributed as open-source and as open-access software. Validation studies were performed on a dataset of 1594 gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI volumes from 13 hospitals and 293 T1-weighted MRI volumes from the BraTS challenge. The glioblastoma tumor core segmentation reached a Dice score slightly below 90%, a patientwise F1-score close to 99%, and a 95th percentile Hausdorff distance slightly below [Formula: see text] mm on average with either architecture and the heavy preprocessing scheme. A patient MRI volume can be segmented in less than one minute, and a standardized report can be generated in up to five minutes. The proposed GSI-RADS software showed robust performance on a large collection of MRI volumes from various hospitals and generated results within a reasonable runtime. MDPI 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8465753/ /pubmed/34572900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184674 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bouget, David
Eijgelaar, Roelant S.
Pedersen, André
Kommers, Ivar
Ardon, Hilko
Barkhof, Frederik
Bello, Lorenzo
Berger, Mitchel S.
Nibali, Marco Conti
Furtner, Julia
Fyllingen, Even Hovig
Hervey-Jumper, Shawn
Idema, Albert J. S.
Kiesel, Barbara
Kloet, Alfred
Mandonnet, Emmanuel
Müller, Domenique M. J.
Robe, Pierre A.
Rossi, Marco
Sagberg, Lisa M.
Sciortino, Tommaso
Van den Brink, Wimar A.
Wagemakers, Michiel
Widhalm, Georg
Witte, Marnix G.
Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
Reinertsen, Ingerid
De Witt Hamer, Philip C.
Solheim, Ole
Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task
title Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task
title_full Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task
title_fullStr Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task
title_full_unstemmed Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task
title_short Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging–Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task
title_sort glioblastoma surgery imaging–reporting and data system: validation and performance of the automated segmentation task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34572900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184674
work_keys_str_mv AT bougetdavid glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT eijgelaarroelants glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT pedersenandre glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT kommersivar glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT ardonhilko glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT barkhoffrederik glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT bellolorenzo glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT bergermitchels glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT nibalimarcoconti glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT furtnerjulia glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT fyllingenevenhovig glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT herveyjumpershawn glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT idemaalbertjs glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT kieselbarbara glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT kloetalfred glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT mandonnetemmanuel glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT mullerdomeniquemj glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT robepierrea glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT rossimarco glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT sagberglisam glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT sciortinotommaso glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT vandenbrinkwimara glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT wagemakersmichiel glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT widhalmgeorg glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT wittemarnixg glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT zwindermanaeilkoh glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT reinertseningerid glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT dewitthamerphilipc glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask
AT solheimole glioblastomasurgeryimagingreportinganddatasystemvalidationandperformanceoftheautomatedsegmentationtask