Cargando…

Restricted visitation policies in acute care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Restricted visitation policies in acute care settings because of the COVID-19 pandemic have negative consequences. The objective of this scoping review is to identify impacts of restricted visitation policies in acute care settings, and describe perspectives and mitigation approaches amo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moss, Stephana J., Krewulak, Karla D., Stelfox, Henry T., Ahmed, Sofia B., Anglin, Melanie C., Bagshaw, Sean M., Burns, Karen E. A., Cook, Deborah J., Doig, Christopher J., Fox-Robichaud, Alison, Fowler, Robert, Hernández, Laura, Kho, Michelle E., Kredentser, Maia, Makuk, Kira, Murthy, Srinivas, Niven, Daniel J., Olafson, Kendiss, Parhar, Ken Kuljit S., Patten, Scott B., Rewa, Oleksa G., Rochwerg, Bram, Sept, Bonnie, Soo, Andrea, Spence, Krista, Spence, Sean, Straus, Sharon, West, Andrew, Parsons Leigh, Jeanna, Fiest, Kirsten M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03763-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Restricted visitation policies in acute care settings because of the COVID-19 pandemic have negative consequences. The objective of this scoping review is to identify impacts of restricted visitation policies in acute care settings, and describe perspectives and mitigation approaches among patients, families, and healthcare professionals. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Healthstar, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on January 01/2021, unrestricted, for published primary research records reporting any study design. We included secondary (e.g., reviews) and non-research records (e.g., commentaries), and performed manual searches in web-based resources. We excluded records that did not report primary data. Two reviewers independently abstracted data in duplicate. RESULTS: Of 7810 citations, we included 155 records. Sixty-six records (43%) were primary research; 29 (44%) case reports or case series, and 26 (39%) cohort studies; 21 (14%) were literature reviews and 8 (5%) were expert recommendations; 54 (35%) were commentary, editorial, or opinion pieces. Restricted visitation policies impacted coping and daily function (n = 31, 20%) and mental health outcomes (n = 29, 19%) of patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Participants described a need for coping and support (n = 107, 69%), connection and communication (n = 107, 69%), and awareness of state of well-being (n = 101, 65%). Eighty-seven approaches to mitigate impact of restricted visitation were identified, targeting families (n = 61, 70%), patients (n = 51, 59%), and healthcare professionals (n = 40, 46%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients, families, and healthcare professionals were impacted by restricted visitation polices in acute care settings during COVID-19. The consequences of this approach on patients and families are understudied and warrant evaluation of approaches to mitigate their impact. Future pandemic policy development should include the perspectives of patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Trial registration: The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020221662) and a protocol peer-reviewed prior to data extraction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03763-7.