Cargando…
Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in New Therapeutic Lung Cancer Trials
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Lung cancer treatment has dramatically evolved in the past decade, but some pitfalls of image interpretation have been introduced in parallel, such as pseudo-progressions. These challenges could be made more evident with blinded independent central reviews, as readers are often blind...
Autores principales: | Beaumont, Hubert, Iannessi, Antoine, Wang, Yi, Voyton, Charles M., Cillario, Jennifer, Liu, Yan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8465869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34572761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184533 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Breaking down the RECIST 1.1 double read variability in lung trials: What do baseline assessments tell us?
por: Iannessi, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Can we predict discordant RECIST 1.1 evaluations in double read clinical trials?
por: Beaumont, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Radiomics Quality Score Assessment of CT Radiomics-Based Models Predicting Tumor EGFR Mutation Status in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
por: Felfli, Mehdi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
por: Iannessi, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Changes of lung tumour volume on CT - prediction of the reliability of assessments
por: Beaumont, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2015)