Cargando…

Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial

BACKGROUND: Serious illness conversations (SICs) are an evidence-based approach to eliciting patients’ values, goals, and care preferences that improve patient outcomes. However, most patients with cancer die without a documented SIC. Clinician-directed implementation strategies informed by behavior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takvorian, Samuel U., Bekelman, Justin, Beidas, Rinad S., Schnoll, Robert, Clifton, Alicia B. W., Salam, Tasnim, Gabriel, Peter, Wileyto, E. Paul, Scott, Callie A., Asch, David A., Buttenheim, Alison M., Rendle, Katharine A., Chaiyachati, Krisda, Shelton, Rachel C., Ware, Sue, Chivers, Corey, Schuchter, Lynn M., Kumar, Pallavi, Shulman, Lawrence N., O’Connor, Nina, Lieberman, Adina, Zentgraf, Kelly, Parikh, Ravi B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8466719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6
_version_ 1784573212076539904
author Takvorian, Samuel U.
Bekelman, Justin
Beidas, Rinad S.
Schnoll, Robert
Clifton, Alicia B. W.
Salam, Tasnim
Gabriel, Peter
Wileyto, E. Paul
Scott, Callie A.
Asch, David A.
Buttenheim, Alison M.
Rendle, Katharine A.
Chaiyachati, Krisda
Shelton, Rachel C.
Ware, Sue
Chivers, Corey
Schuchter, Lynn M.
Kumar, Pallavi
Shulman, Lawrence N.
O’Connor, Nina
Lieberman, Adina
Zentgraf, Kelly
Parikh, Ravi B.
author_facet Takvorian, Samuel U.
Bekelman, Justin
Beidas, Rinad S.
Schnoll, Robert
Clifton, Alicia B. W.
Salam, Tasnim
Gabriel, Peter
Wileyto, E. Paul
Scott, Callie A.
Asch, David A.
Buttenheim, Alison M.
Rendle, Katharine A.
Chaiyachati, Krisda
Shelton, Rachel C.
Ware, Sue
Chivers, Corey
Schuchter, Lynn M.
Kumar, Pallavi
Shulman, Lawrence N.
O’Connor, Nina
Lieberman, Adina
Zentgraf, Kelly
Parikh, Ravi B.
author_sort Takvorian, Samuel U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Serious illness conversations (SICs) are an evidence-based approach to eliciting patients’ values, goals, and care preferences that improve patient outcomes. However, most patients with cancer die without a documented SIC. Clinician-directed implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics (“nudges”) that identify high-risk patients have shown promise in increasing SIC documentation among clinicians. It is unknown whether patient-directed nudges that normalize and prime patients towards SIC completion—either alone or in combination with clinician nudges that additionally compare performance relative to peers—may improve on this approach. Our objective is to test the effect of clinician- and patient-directed nudges as implementation strategies for increasing SIC completion among patients with cancer. METHODS: We will conduct a 2 × 2 factorial, cluster randomized pragmatic trial to test the effect of nudges to clinicians, patients, or both, compared to usual care, on SIC completion. Participants will include 166 medical and gynecologic oncology clinicians practicing at ten sites within a large academic health system and their approximately 5500 patients at high risk of predicted 6-month mortality based on a validated machine-learning prognostic algorithm. Data will be obtained via the electronic medical record, clinician survey, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients. The primary outcome will be time to SIC documentation among high-risk patients. Secondary outcomes will include time to SIC documentation among all patients (assessing spillover effects), palliative care referral among high-risk patients, and aggressive end-of-life care utilization (composite of chemotherapy within 14 days before death, hospitalization within 30 days before death, or admission to hospice within 3 days before death) among high-risk decedents. We will assess moderators of the effect of implementation strategies and conduct semi-structured interviews with a subset of clinicians and patients to assess contextual factors that shape the effectiveness of nudges with an eye towards health equity. DISCUSSION: This will be the first pragmatic trial to evaluate clinician- and patient-directed nudges to promote SIC completion for patients with cancer. We expect the study to yield insights into the effectiveness of clinician and patient nudges as implementation strategies to improve SIC rates, and to uncover multilevel contextual factors that drive response to these strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04867850. Registered on April 30, 2021. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute P50CA244690 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8466719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84667192021-09-27 Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial Takvorian, Samuel U. Bekelman, Justin Beidas, Rinad S. Schnoll, Robert Clifton, Alicia B. W. Salam, Tasnim Gabriel, Peter Wileyto, E. Paul Scott, Callie A. Asch, David A. Buttenheim, Alison M. Rendle, Katharine A. Chaiyachati, Krisda Shelton, Rachel C. Ware, Sue Chivers, Corey Schuchter, Lynn M. Kumar, Pallavi Shulman, Lawrence N. O’Connor, Nina Lieberman, Adina Zentgraf, Kelly Parikh, Ravi B. Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Serious illness conversations (SICs) are an evidence-based approach to eliciting patients’ values, goals, and care preferences that improve patient outcomes. However, most patients with cancer die without a documented SIC. Clinician-directed implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics (“nudges”) that identify high-risk patients have shown promise in increasing SIC documentation among clinicians. It is unknown whether patient-directed nudges that normalize and prime patients towards SIC completion—either alone or in combination with clinician nudges that additionally compare performance relative to peers—may improve on this approach. Our objective is to test the effect of clinician- and patient-directed nudges as implementation strategies for increasing SIC completion among patients with cancer. METHODS: We will conduct a 2 × 2 factorial, cluster randomized pragmatic trial to test the effect of nudges to clinicians, patients, or both, compared to usual care, on SIC completion. Participants will include 166 medical and gynecologic oncology clinicians practicing at ten sites within a large academic health system and their approximately 5500 patients at high risk of predicted 6-month mortality based on a validated machine-learning prognostic algorithm. Data will be obtained via the electronic medical record, clinician survey, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients. The primary outcome will be time to SIC documentation among high-risk patients. Secondary outcomes will include time to SIC documentation among all patients (assessing spillover effects), palliative care referral among high-risk patients, and aggressive end-of-life care utilization (composite of chemotherapy within 14 days before death, hospitalization within 30 days before death, or admission to hospice within 3 days before death) among high-risk decedents. We will assess moderators of the effect of implementation strategies and conduct semi-structured interviews with a subset of clinicians and patients to assess contextual factors that shape the effectiveness of nudges with an eye towards health equity. DISCUSSION: This will be the first pragmatic trial to evaluate clinician- and patient-directed nudges to promote SIC completion for patients with cancer. We expect the study to yield insights into the effectiveness of clinician and patient nudges as implementation strategies to improve SIC rates, and to uncover multilevel contextual factors that drive response to these strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04867850. Registered on April 30, 2021. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute P50CA244690 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6. BioMed Central 2021-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8466719/ /pubmed/34563227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Takvorian, Samuel U.
Bekelman, Justin
Beidas, Rinad S.
Schnoll, Robert
Clifton, Alicia B. W.
Salam, Tasnim
Gabriel, Peter
Wileyto, E. Paul
Scott, Callie A.
Asch, David A.
Buttenheim, Alison M.
Rendle, Katharine A.
Chaiyachati, Krisda
Shelton, Rachel C.
Ware, Sue
Chivers, Corey
Schuchter, Lynn M.
Kumar, Pallavi
Shulman, Lawrence N.
O’Connor, Nina
Lieberman, Adina
Zentgraf, Kelly
Parikh, Ravi B.
Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial
title Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial
title_full Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial
title_fullStr Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial
title_short Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial
title_sort behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8466719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6
work_keys_str_mv AT takvoriansamuelu behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT bekelmanjustin behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT beidasrinads behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT schnollrobert behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT cliftonaliciabw behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT salamtasnim behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT gabrielpeter behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT wileytoepaul behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT scottcalliea behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT aschdavida behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT buttenheimalisonm behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT rendlekatharinea behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT chaiyachatikrisda behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT sheltonrachelc behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT waresue behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT chiverscorey behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT schuchterlynnm behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT kumarpallavi behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT shulmanlawrencen behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT oconnornina behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT liebermanadina behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT zentgrafkelly behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT parikhravib behavioraleconomicimplementationstrategiestoimproveseriousillnesscommunicationbetweencliniciansandhighriskpatientswithcancerprotocolforaclusterrandomizedpragmatictrial