Cargando…

Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation

Background: The combination of intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) removal and cochlear implantation is the standard of care after surgical resection for audiological rehabilitation. Intracochlear ILS is not only the most frequent tumor in this group of schwannomas, but it is also, to some degree, su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sudhoff, Holger, Scholtz, Lars Uwe, Gehl, Hans Björn, Todt, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8466831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221
_version_ 1784573240454152192
author Sudhoff, Holger
Scholtz, Lars Uwe
Gehl, Hans Björn
Todt, Ingo
author_facet Sudhoff, Holger
Scholtz, Lars Uwe
Gehl, Hans Björn
Todt, Ingo
author_sort Sudhoff, Holger
collection PubMed
description Background: The combination of intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) removal and cochlear implantation is the standard of care after surgical resection for audiological rehabilitation. Intracochlear ILS is not only the most frequent tumor in this group of schwannomas, but it is also, to some degree, surgically the most challenging because of its position behind the modiolus. Recent developments in the knowledge of implant position, implant magnet choice, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences make an MRI follow-up after surgical removal possible. Thus far, no results are known about the surgical success and residual rate of these kind of tumors. The aim of the present study was to perform an early MRI follow-up for the evaluation of residual or recurrent intracochlear ILS after surgical removal and cochlear implantation. Methods: In a retrospective study, we evaluated seven patients after an intracochlear ILS removal and single-stage cochlear implantation with a mean period of 13.4 months post surgery with a 3T T1 GAD 2 mm sequence for a residual ILS. Patients were operated on using an individualized technique concept. Results: In six out of seven cases, 3 T T1 GAD 2 mm MRI follow-up showed no residual or recurrent tumor. In one case, a T1 signal indicated a tumor of the upper inner auditory canal (IAC) at the MRI follow up. Conclusion: MRI follow-up as a quality control tool after ILS removal and cochlear implantation is highly important to exclude residual tumors. Long-term MRI evaluation results are needed and can be obtained under consideration of implant position, implant magnet, and MRI sequence choice. A preoperative MRI slice thickness less than 2 mm can be recommended to visualize possible modiolar and IAC expansion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8466831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84668312021-09-27 Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation Sudhoff, Holger Scholtz, Lars Uwe Gehl, Hans Björn Todt, Ingo Brain Sci Article Background: The combination of intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) removal and cochlear implantation is the standard of care after surgical resection for audiological rehabilitation. Intracochlear ILS is not only the most frequent tumor in this group of schwannomas, but it is also, to some degree, surgically the most challenging because of its position behind the modiolus. Recent developments in the knowledge of implant position, implant magnet choice, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences make an MRI follow-up after surgical removal possible. Thus far, no results are known about the surgical success and residual rate of these kind of tumors. The aim of the present study was to perform an early MRI follow-up for the evaluation of residual or recurrent intracochlear ILS after surgical removal and cochlear implantation. Methods: In a retrospective study, we evaluated seven patients after an intracochlear ILS removal and single-stage cochlear implantation with a mean period of 13.4 months post surgery with a 3T T1 GAD 2 mm sequence for a residual ILS. Patients were operated on using an individualized technique concept. Results: In six out of seven cases, 3 T T1 GAD 2 mm MRI follow-up showed no residual or recurrent tumor. In one case, a T1 signal indicated a tumor of the upper inner auditory canal (IAC) at the MRI follow up. Conclusion: MRI follow-up as a quality control tool after ILS removal and cochlear implantation is highly important to exclude residual tumors. Long-term MRI evaluation results are needed and can be obtained under consideration of implant position, implant magnet, and MRI sequence choice. A preoperative MRI slice thickness less than 2 mm can be recommended to visualize possible modiolar and IAC expansion. MDPI 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8466831/ /pubmed/34573240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sudhoff, Holger
Scholtz, Lars Uwe
Gehl, Hans Björn
Todt, Ingo
Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation
title Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation
title_full Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation
title_fullStr Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation
title_short Quality Control after Intracochlear Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation
title_sort quality control after intracochlear intralabyrinthine schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8466831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091221
work_keys_str_mv AT sudhoffholger qualitycontrolafterintracochlearintralabyrinthineschwannomaresectionandcochlearimplantation
AT scholtzlarsuwe qualitycontrolafterintracochlearintralabyrinthineschwannomaresectionandcochlearimplantation
AT gehlhansbjorn qualitycontrolafterintracochlearintralabyrinthineschwannomaresectionandcochlearimplantation
AT todtingo qualitycontrolafterintracochlearintralabyrinthineschwannomaresectionandcochlearimplantation