Cargando…
Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance and presence of zoonotic enteropathogens in shelter dogs pose a public health risk to shelter workers and potential adopters alike. In this study we investigated the prevalence of zoonotic bacterial pathogens and cephalosporin resistant (Cef(R)) enteric bacteria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8467218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03025-2 |
_version_ | 1784573341028319232 |
---|---|
author | Verma, Ashutosh Carney, Kimberly Taylor, Marina Amsler, Kaitlyn Morgan, Joey Gruszynski, Karen Erol, Erdal Carter, Craig Locke, Stephan Callipare, Ashton Shah, Devendra H. |
author_facet | Verma, Ashutosh Carney, Kimberly Taylor, Marina Amsler, Kaitlyn Morgan, Joey Gruszynski, Karen Erol, Erdal Carter, Craig Locke, Stephan Callipare, Ashton Shah, Devendra H. |
author_sort | Verma, Ashutosh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance and presence of zoonotic enteropathogens in shelter dogs pose a public health risk to shelter workers and potential adopters alike. In this study we investigated the prevalence of zoonotic bacterial pathogens and cephalosporin resistant (Cef(R)) enteric bacteria in the feces of apparently healthy shelter dogs in the Cumberland Gap Region (CGR) in the US states of Kentucky, Tennessee and Virginia. RESULTS: Fecal samples of 59 dogs from 10 shelters in the CGR of Central and South-Central Appalachia were screened for the presence of Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella and Cef(R) enteric bacteria. C. jejuni, C. perfringens were detected by PCR based assays. Culture and PCR were used for Salmonella detection. Of 59 dogs, fecal samples from 14 (23.7%) and 8 (13.6%) dogs tested positive for cpa and hipO genes of C. perfringens and C. jejuni, respectively. Salmonella was not detected in any of the tested samples by PCR or culture. Cef(R) enteric bacteria were isolated on MacConkey agar supplemented with ceftiofur followed by identification using MALDI-TOF. Fecal samples from 16 dogs (27.1%) yielded a total of 18 Cef(R) enteric bacteria. Majority of Cef(R) isolates (14/18, 77.8%) were E. coli followed by, one isolate each of Enterococcus hirae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter pittii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cef(R) enteric bacteria were tested for resistance against 19- or 24-antibiotic panels using broth microdilution method. Seventeen (94.4%) Cef(R) bacteria were resistant to more than one antimicrobial agent, and 14 (77.8%) displayed multidrug resistance (MDR). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that shelter dogs within the CGR not only carry zoonotic bacterial pathogens, but also shed multidrug resistant enteric bacteria in their feces that may pose public health risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8467218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84672182021-09-28 Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia Verma, Ashutosh Carney, Kimberly Taylor, Marina Amsler, Kaitlyn Morgan, Joey Gruszynski, Karen Erol, Erdal Carter, Craig Locke, Stephan Callipare, Ashton Shah, Devendra H. BMC Vet Res Research BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance and presence of zoonotic enteropathogens in shelter dogs pose a public health risk to shelter workers and potential adopters alike. In this study we investigated the prevalence of zoonotic bacterial pathogens and cephalosporin resistant (Cef(R)) enteric bacteria in the feces of apparently healthy shelter dogs in the Cumberland Gap Region (CGR) in the US states of Kentucky, Tennessee and Virginia. RESULTS: Fecal samples of 59 dogs from 10 shelters in the CGR of Central and South-Central Appalachia were screened for the presence of Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella and Cef(R) enteric bacteria. C. jejuni, C. perfringens were detected by PCR based assays. Culture and PCR were used for Salmonella detection. Of 59 dogs, fecal samples from 14 (23.7%) and 8 (13.6%) dogs tested positive for cpa and hipO genes of C. perfringens and C. jejuni, respectively. Salmonella was not detected in any of the tested samples by PCR or culture. Cef(R) enteric bacteria were isolated on MacConkey agar supplemented with ceftiofur followed by identification using MALDI-TOF. Fecal samples from 16 dogs (27.1%) yielded a total of 18 Cef(R) enteric bacteria. Majority of Cef(R) isolates (14/18, 77.8%) were E. coli followed by, one isolate each of Enterococcus hirae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter pittii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cef(R) enteric bacteria were tested for resistance against 19- or 24-antibiotic panels using broth microdilution method. Seventeen (94.4%) Cef(R) bacteria were resistant to more than one antimicrobial agent, and 14 (77.8%) displayed multidrug resistance (MDR). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that shelter dogs within the CGR not only carry zoonotic bacterial pathogens, but also shed multidrug resistant enteric bacteria in their feces that may pose public health risks. BioMed Central 2021-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8467218/ /pubmed/34563197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03025-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Verma, Ashutosh Carney, Kimberly Taylor, Marina Amsler, Kaitlyn Morgan, Joey Gruszynski, Karen Erol, Erdal Carter, Craig Locke, Stephan Callipare, Ashton Shah, Devendra H. Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia |
title | Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia |
title_full | Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia |
title_fullStr | Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia |
title_full_unstemmed | Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia |
title_short | Occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the Central and South-Central Appalachia |
title_sort | occurrence of potentially zoonotic and cephalosporin resistant enteric bacteria among shelter dogs in the central and south-central appalachia |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8467218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03025-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vermaashutosh occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT carneykimberly occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT taylormarina occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT amslerkaitlyn occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT morganjoey occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT gruszynskikaren occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT erolerdal occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT cartercraig occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT lockestephan occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT callipareashton occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia AT shahdevendrah occurrenceofpotentiallyzoonoticandcephalosporinresistantentericbacteriaamongshelterdogsinthecentralandsouthcentralappalachia |