Cargando…

Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI

Imaging of the electrical conductivity distribution inside the human body has been investigated for numerous clinical applications. The conductivity tensors of biological tissue have been obtained from water diffusion tensors by applying several models, which may not cover the entire phenomenon. Rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katoch, Nitish, Choi, Bup-Kyung, Park, Ji-Ae, Ko, In-Ok, Kim, Hyung-Joong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8467711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185499
_version_ 1784573468413526016
author Katoch, Nitish
Choi, Bup-Kyung
Park, Ji-Ae
Ko, In-Ok
Kim, Hyung-Joong
author_facet Katoch, Nitish
Choi, Bup-Kyung
Park, Ji-Ae
Ko, In-Ok
Kim, Hyung-Joong
author_sort Katoch, Nitish
collection PubMed
description Imaging of the electrical conductivity distribution inside the human body has been investigated for numerous clinical applications. The conductivity tensors of biological tissue have been obtained from water diffusion tensors by applying several models, which may not cover the entire phenomenon. Recently, a new conductivity tensor imaging (CTI) method was developed through a combination of B1 mapping, and multi-b diffusion weighted imaging. In this study, we compared the most recent CTI method with the four existing models of conductivity tensors reconstruction. Two conductivity phantoms were designed to evaluate the accuracy of the models. Applied to five human brains, the conductivity tensors using the four existing models and CTI were imaged and compared with the values from the literature. The conductivity image of the phantoms by the CTI method showed relative errors between 1.10% and 5.26%. The images by the four models using DTI could not measure the effects of different ion concentrations subsequently due to prior information of the mean conductivity values. The conductivity tensor images obtained from five human brains through the CTI method were comparable to previously reported literature values. The images by the four methods using DTI were highly correlated with the diffusion tensor images, showing a coefficient of determination (R [Formula: see text]) value of 0.65 to 1.00. However, the images by the CTI method were less correlated with the diffusion tensor images and exhibited an averaged R [Formula: see text] value of 0.51. The CTI method could handle the effects of different ion concentrations as well as mobilities and extracellular volume fractions by collecting and processing additional B1 map data. It is necessary to select an application-specific model taking into account the pros and cons of each model. Future studies are essential to confirm the usefulness of these conductivity tensor imaging methods in clinical applications, such as tumor characterization, EEG source imaging, and treatment planning for electrical stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8467711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84677112021-09-27 Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI Katoch, Nitish Choi, Bup-Kyung Park, Ji-Ae Ko, In-Ok Kim, Hyung-Joong Molecules Article Imaging of the electrical conductivity distribution inside the human body has been investigated for numerous clinical applications. The conductivity tensors of biological tissue have been obtained from water diffusion tensors by applying several models, which may not cover the entire phenomenon. Recently, a new conductivity tensor imaging (CTI) method was developed through a combination of B1 mapping, and multi-b diffusion weighted imaging. In this study, we compared the most recent CTI method with the four existing models of conductivity tensors reconstruction. Two conductivity phantoms were designed to evaluate the accuracy of the models. Applied to five human brains, the conductivity tensors using the four existing models and CTI were imaged and compared with the values from the literature. The conductivity image of the phantoms by the CTI method showed relative errors between 1.10% and 5.26%. The images by the four models using DTI could not measure the effects of different ion concentrations subsequently due to prior information of the mean conductivity values. The conductivity tensor images obtained from five human brains through the CTI method were comparable to previously reported literature values. The images by the four methods using DTI were highly correlated with the diffusion tensor images, showing a coefficient of determination (R [Formula: see text]) value of 0.65 to 1.00. However, the images by the CTI method were less correlated with the diffusion tensor images and exhibited an averaged R [Formula: see text] value of 0.51. The CTI method could handle the effects of different ion concentrations as well as mobilities and extracellular volume fractions by collecting and processing additional B1 map data. It is necessary to select an application-specific model taking into account the pros and cons of each model. Future studies are essential to confirm the usefulness of these conductivity tensor imaging methods in clinical applications, such as tumor characterization, EEG source imaging, and treatment planning for electrical stimulation. MDPI 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8467711/ /pubmed/34576970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185499 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Katoch, Nitish
Choi, Bup-Kyung
Park, Ji-Ae
Ko, In-Ok
Kim, Hyung-Joong
Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI
title Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI
title_full Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI
title_fullStr Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI
title_short Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI
title_sort comparison of five conductivity tensor models and image reconstruction methods using mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8467711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34576970
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185499
work_keys_str_mv AT katochnitish comparisonoffiveconductivitytensormodelsandimagereconstructionmethodsusingmri
AT choibupkyung comparisonoffiveconductivitytensormodelsandimagereconstructionmethodsusingmri
AT parkjiae comparisonoffiveconductivitytensormodelsandimagereconstructionmethodsusingmri
AT koinok comparisonoffiveconductivitytensormodelsandimagereconstructionmethodsusingmri
AT kimhyungjoong comparisonoffiveconductivitytensormodelsandimagereconstructionmethodsusingmri