Cargando…

Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates

In our study, we added a three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound (3D ABUS) to mammography to evaluate the performance and cancer detection rate of mammography alone or with the addition of 3D prone ABUS in women with dense breasts. Our prospective observational study was based on the screening...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatta, Gianluca, Cappabianca, Salvatore, La Forgia, Daniele, Massafra, Raffaella, Fanizzi, Annarita, Cuccurullo, Vincenzo, Brunese, Luca, Tagliafico, Alberto, Grassi, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11090875
_version_ 1784573584027418624
author Gatta, Gianluca
Cappabianca, Salvatore
La Forgia, Daniele
Massafra, Raffaella
Fanizzi, Annarita
Cuccurullo, Vincenzo
Brunese, Luca
Tagliafico, Alberto
Grassi, Roberto
author_facet Gatta, Gianluca
Cappabianca, Salvatore
La Forgia, Daniele
Massafra, Raffaella
Fanizzi, Annarita
Cuccurullo, Vincenzo
Brunese, Luca
Tagliafico, Alberto
Grassi, Roberto
author_sort Gatta, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description In our study, we added a three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound (3D ABUS) to mammography to evaluate the performance and cancer detection rate of mammography alone or with the addition of 3D prone ABUS in women with dense breasts. Our prospective observational study was based on the screening of 1165 asymptomatic women with dense breasts who selected independent of risk factors. The results evaluated include the cancers detected between June 2017 and February 2019, and all surveys were subjected to a double reading. Mammography detected four cancers, while mammography combined with a prone Sofia system (3D ABUS) doubled the detection rate, with eight instances of cancer being found. The diagnostic yield difference was 3.4 per 1000. Mammography alone was subjected to a recall rate of 14.5 for 1000 women, while mammography combined with 3D prone ABUS resulted in a recall rate of 26.6 per 1000 women. We also observed an additional 12.1 recalls per 1000 women screened. Integrating full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with 3D prone ABUS in women with high breast density increases and improves breast cancer detection rates in a significant manner, including small and invasive cancers, and it has a tolerable impact on recall rate. Moreover, 3D prone ABUS performance results are comparable with the performance results of the supine 3D ABUS system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8468126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84681262021-09-27 Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates Gatta, Gianluca Cappabianca, Salvatore La Forgia, Daniele Massafra, Raffaella Fanizzi, Annarita Cuccurullo, Vincenzo Brunese, Luca Tagliafico, Alberto Grassi, Roberto J Pers Med Article In our study, we added a three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound (3D ABUS) to mammography to evaluate the performance and cancer detection rate of mammography alone or with the addition of 3D prone ABUS in women with dense breasts. Our prospective observational study was based on the screening of 1165 asymptomatic women with dense breasts who selected independent of risk factors. The results evaluated include the cancers detected between June 2017 and February 2019, and all surveys were subjected to a double reading. Mammography detected four cancers, while mammography combined with a prone Sofia system (3D ABUS) doubled the detection rate, with eight instances of cancer being found. The diagnostic yield difference was 3.4 per 1000. Mammography alone was subjected to a recall rate of 14.5 for 1000 women, while mammography combined with 3D prone ABUS resulted in a recall rate of 26.6 per 1000 women. We also observed an additional 12.1 recalls per 1000 women screened. Integrating full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with 3D prone ABUS in women with high breast density increases and improves breast cancer detection rates in a significant manner, including small and invasive cancers, and it has a tolerable impact on recall rate. Moreover, 3D prone ABUS performance results are comparable with the performance results of the supine 3D ABUS system. MDPI 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8468126/ /pubmed/34575652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11090875 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gatta, Gianluca
Cappabianca, Salvatore
La Forgia, Daniele
Massafra, Raffaella
Fanizzi, Annarita
Cuccurullo, Vincenzo
Brunese, Luca
Tagliafico, Alberto
Grassi, Roberto
Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates
title Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates
title_full Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates
title_fullStr Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates
title_full_unstemmed Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates
title_short Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates
title_sort second-generation 3d automated breast ultrasonography (prone abus) for dense breast cancer screening integrated to mammography: effectiveness, performance and detection rates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34575652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11090875
work_keys_str_mv AT gattagianluca secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT cappabiancasalvatore secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT laforgiadaniele secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT massafraraffaella secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT fanizziannarita secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT cuccurullovincenzo secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT bruneseluca secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT tagliaficoalberto secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates
AT grassiroberto secondgeneration3dautomatedbreastultrasonographyproneabusfordensebreastcancerscreeningintegratedtomammographyeffectivenessperformanceanddetectionrates