Cargando…

Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation

Classically, microfiltration (0.1–0.5 µm) of bovine skim milk is performed at warm temperatures (45–55 °C), to produce micellar casein and milk-derived whey protein ingredients. Microfiltration at these temperatures is associated with high initial permeate flux and allows for the retention of the ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: France, Thomas C., Kelly, Alan L., Crowley, Shane V., O’Mahony, James A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10092091
_version_ 1784573678963392512
author France, Thomas C.
Kelly, Alan L.
Crowley, Shane V.
O’Mahony, James A.
author_facet France, Thomas C.
Kelly, Alan L.
Crowley, Shane V.
O’Mahony, James A.
author_sort France, Thomas C.
collection PubMed
description Classically, microfiltration (0.1–0.5 µm) of bovine skim milk is performed at warm temperatures (45–55 °C), to produce micellar casein and milk-derived whey protein ingredients. Microfiltration at these temperatures is associated with high initial permeate flux and allows for the retention of the casein fraction, resulting in a whey protein fraction of high purity. Increasingly, however, the microfiltration of skim milk and other dairy streams at low temperatures (≤20 °C) is being used in the dairy industry. The trend towards cold filtration has arisen due to associated benefits of improved microbial quality and reduced fouling, allowing for extended processing times, improved product quality and opportunities for more sustainable processing. Performing microfiltration of skim milk at low temperatures also alters the protein profile and mineral composition of the resulting processing streams, allowing for the generation of new ingredients. However, the use of low processing temperatures is associated with high mechanical energy consumption to compensate for the increased viscosity, and thermal energy consumption for inline cooling, impacting the sustainability of the process. This review will examine the differences between warm and cold microfiltration in terms of membrane performance, partitioning of bovine milk constituents, microbial growth, ingredient innovation and process sustainability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8468473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84684732021-09-27 Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation France, Thomas C. Kelly, Alan L. Crowley, Shane V. O’Mahony, James A. Foods Review Classically, microfiltration (0.1–0.5 µm) of bovine skim milk is performed at warm temperatures (45–55 °C), to produce micellar casein and milk-derived whey protein ingredients. Microfiltration at these temperatures is associated with high initial permeate flux and allows for the retention of the casein fraction, resulting in a whey protein fraction of high purity. Increasingly, however, the microfiltration of skim milk and other dairy streams at low temperatures (≤20 °C) is being used in the dairy industry. The trend towards cold filtration has arisen due to associated benefits of improved microbial quality and reduced fouling, allowing for extended processing times, improved product quality and opportunities for more sustainable processing. Performing microfiltration of skim milk at low temperatures also alters the protein profile and mineral composition of the resulting processing streams, allowing for the generation of new ingredients. However, the use of low processing temperatures is associated with high mechanical energy consumption to compensate for the increased viscosity, and thermal energy consumption for inline cooling, impacting the sustainability of the process. This review will examine the differences between warm and cold microfiltration in terms of membrane performance, partitioning of bovine milk constituents, microbial growth, ingredient innovation and process sustainability. MDPI 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8468473/ /pubmed/34574201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10092091 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
France, Thomas C.
Kelly, Alan L.
Crowley, Shane V.
O’Mahony, James A.
Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation
title Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation
title_full Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation
title_fullStr Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation
title_full_unstemmed Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation
title_short Cold Microfiltration as an Enabler of Sustainable Dairy Protein Ingredient Innovation
title_sort cold microfiltration as an enabler of sustainable dairy protein ingredient innovation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8468473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34574201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10092091
work_keys_str_mv AT francethomasc coldmicrofiltrationasanenablerofsustainabledairyproteiningredientinnovation
AT kellyalanl coldmicrofiltrationasanenablerofsustainabledairyproteiningredientinnovation
AT crowleyshanev coldmicrofiltrationasanenablerofsustainabledairyproteiningredientinnovation
AT omahonyjamesa coldmicrofiltrationasanenablerofsustainabledairyproteiningredientinnovation